Skip to content

Comparison of the Functional Walking Outcomes of Two Settings of a Commercially Available AFO in Adult Stroke Patients

Comparison of the Functional Walking Outcomes of Two Settings of a Commercially Available Ankle Foot Orthosis in Adult Stroke Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02122783
Enrollment
5
Registered
2014-04-25
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2020-01-30
Last updated
2021-10-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Walking Aided by a Leg Brace in Stroke Subjects

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how two different settings of a commercially available ankle foot brace affect how stroke patients walk. The study brace is an ankle foot orthosis (AFO) that makes use of a newer type of joint that contains a soft insert, in addition to the conventional hard stops, to limit the range of motion of the ankle during walking. The results of this study will help to clarify 1) whether and how this new joint affects the way you walk, 2) whether it makes it easier for the clinician to align your brace and 3) your opinions about the new joint.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how two different settings of a commercially available ankle foot brace affect how stroke patients walk. The study brace is an ankle foot orthosis (AFO) that makes use of a newer type of joint that contains a soft insert, in addition to the conventional hard stops, to limit the range of motion of the ankle during walking. Participants undergo testing in the gaitlab after using the new brace for a period of time. The results of this study will help to clarify 1) whether and how this new joint affects the way you walk, 2) whether it makes it easier for the clinician to align your brace and 3) your opinions about the new joint.

Interventions

DEVICEADR™ brace resistance
DEVICEConventional brace resistance (using hard stops)

Conventional polypropylene custom molded ankle foot orthosis (MAFO) with Lawrence style double channel adjustable joints containing pins/springs

Sponsors

Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Between the ages of 21 and 70 males and non-pregnant females 2. Diagnosis of stroke more than 1 year ago 3. Ambulatory at 0.5m/s or greater 4. Require unilateral AFOs to ambulate 5. Stable medical condition - no concomitant progressive diseases that could affect motor function 6. Ability to comply with directions and cooperate with research team

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects who are currently receiving physical therapy for gait problems 2. Anticipated surgical or pharmacologic intervention for tone/contractures during the study period 3. Additional neurologic or musculoskeletal diagnoses that might impair gait (i.e., recent orthopedic interventions (6 weeks), unhealed fractures, significant degenerative joint disease, lower limb amputation, uncontrolled seizures) 4. Recent cardiac or active pulmonary disease, liable blood pressure 5. Recent back surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-selected Walking Velocity8 weekswalking velocity will be assessed by an electronic temporospatial foot-fall measurement system (gaitmat)
Step Length Symmetry8 weeksstep length symmetry will be assessed by an electronic temporospatial foot-fall measurement system (gaitmat). symmetry will result in a ratio of step length on more involved or affected side compared to the less involved or affected (i.e. the normal) side. as such, the measure will appear to have no units but actually will be a ratio of the same units (in this case, meters to meters).
Step Time Symmetry8 weeksstep time symmetry will be assessed by an electronic temporospatial foot-fall measurement system (gaitmat). symmetry will result in a ratio of step time on more involved or affected side compared to the less involved or affected (i.e. the normal) side. as such, the measure will appear to have no units but actually will be a ratio of the same units (in this case, seconds to seconds).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Activity (Step Count)8 weeksactivity will be measured using accelerometer based step activity monitoring devices
Subject Opinions8 weekssubject opinions will be measured using surveys and questionnaires
Joint Kinematics8 weeksjoint kinematics will be assessed using motion capture system
Joint Kinetics8 weeksjoint kinematics will be assessed using motion capture and biomechanical force measurement systems

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

This is a cross over study - so all participants received both interventions (i.e. were in both study arms).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Conventional Then Experimental Brace Resistance
Conventional intervention Conventional brace resistance (using hard stops): Conventional polypropylene custom molded ankle foot orthosis (MAFO) with Lawrence style double channel adjustable joints containing pins/springs Experimental intervention Same MAFO as above but now using ADR™ soft polymer as brace resistance
2
Experimental Then Conventional Brace Resistance
Experimental intervention Conventional polypropylene custom molded ankle foot orthosis (MAFO) with Lawrence style double channel adjustable joints containing ADR™ soft polymer as brace resistance Conventional intervention Same MAFO as above but now using springs/pins as brace resistance
3
Total5

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimental Then Conventional Brace ResistanceConventional Then Experimental Brace ResistanceTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Age, Continuous55.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
54.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
54.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants2 participants5 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 51 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Self-selected Walking Velocity

walking velocity will be assessed by an electronic temporospatial foot-fall measurement system (gaitmat)

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conventional Brace Resistance (Hardstop)Self-selected Walking Velocity0.71 m/sStandard Deviation 0.39
ADR™ Brace ResistanceSelf-selected Walking Velocity0.74 m/sStandard Deviation 0.38
Primary

Step Length Symmetry

step length symmetry will be assessed by an electronic temporospatial foot-fall measurement system (gaitmat). symmetry will result in a ratio of step length on more involved or affected side compared to the less involved or affected (i.e. the normal) side. as such, the measure will appear to have no units but actually will be a ratio of the same units (in this case, meters to meters).

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conventional Brace Resistance (Hardstop)Step Length Symmetry0.98 ratio (m/m)Standard Deviation 0.24
ADR™ Brace ResistanceStep Length Symmetry0.96 ratio (m/m)Standard Deviation 0.25
Primary

Step Time Symmetry

step time symmetry will be assessed by an electronic temporospatial foot-fall measurement system (gaitmat). symmetry will result in a ratio of step time on more involved or affected side compared to the less involved or affected (i.e. the normal) side. as such, the measure will appear to have no units but actually will be a ratio of the same units (in this case, seconds to seconds).

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conventional Brace Resistance (Hardstop)Step Time Symmetry1.03 ratio (seconds/seconds)Standard Deviation 0.52
ADR™ Brace ResistanceStep Time Symmetry0.99 ratio (seconds/seconds)Standard Deviation 0.43
Secondary

Activity (Step Count)

activity will be measured using accelerometer based step activity monitoring devices

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: These data will never be analyzed as they were not collected.

Secondary

Joint Kinematics

joint kinematics will be assessed using motion capture system

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: These data will never be analyzed as they were not collected.

Secondary

Joint Kinetics

joint kinematics will be assessed using motion capture and biomechanical force measurement systems

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: These data will never be analyzed as they were not collected.

Secondary

Subject Opinions

subject opinions will be measured using surveys and questionnaires

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: These data will never be analyzed as they were not collected.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026