Dermatologic Conditions
Conditions
Keywords
teledermatology, dermatology, general practice, organization of care
Brief summary
In France, there is usually a long delay (approximately 6 weeks) before a general practitioner can obtain a specialized advice by dermatologists for diagnosis of unusual dermatologic conditions of their patients. Previous studies have shown that teledermatology is a reliable way for diagnosis in dermatology. We hypothesize that a teledermatology advice could reduce delay before diagnosis and therefore treatment for patients.
Detailed description
In France, there is usually a long delay (approximately 6 weeks) before a general practitioner can obtain a specialized advice by dermatologists for diagnosis of unusual dermatologic conditions of their patients. Previous studies have shown that teledermatology is a reliable way for diagnosis in dermatology. We hypothesize that a teledermatology advice could reduce delay before diagnosis and therefore treatment for patients.
Interventions
OTHERTeledermatology
General practitioner takes 3 photographs per dermatologic lesion using either a telephone with a 3Mega Pixel minimum camera or a standard camera following recommendations of the practice guidelines for teledermatology (2007) of the American Telemedicine Association. Photographs are sent by email using a secured mail server with at least the following information=date of symptoms, symptomatology, topography of lesions, description of lesions, extension, recent drug intakes) Photographs are read and analyzed by a single dermatologist who gives an expert answer (diagnosis and/or treatment). Answer is sent back to the general practitioner by email (using a secured mail server). Answer contains at least the following information= are photographs usable? What is the diagnosis? If necessary, which treatment should the general practitioner begin ? If necessary, does the patient need a consultation with a dermatologist ?
Sponsors
University Paris 7 - Denis Diderot
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Consultation with a general practitioner for any motive during which, the general practitioner deems necessary to obtain a dermatologic expertise for a skin lesion (for diagnosis or treatment)
Exclusion criteria
* Emergency, assessed by the general practitioner (needs care or quick telephonic advice in the next 24 hours) * Patients for which diagnosis and/or treatment are known by the general practitioner (the GP needs a dermatologic advice for a specific treatment (for example= laser, instrumental treatment...)) * Patient cannot go the dermatologic consultation by himself (for example: dependant patients...) * Cognitive or psychiatric impairment (cannot give informed consent)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Delay before expertise by a dermatologist | 3 months | Delay, in days, between a patient's consultation with his general practitioner and expertise by a dermatologist (teledermatology or classic consultation) that allows either diagnostic and/or initiation of treatment. For example: in the teledermatology group, if the specialist needs to see the patient because the photographs cannot be analyzed correctly, date of expertise is the date of the consultation with the dermatologist. Data is censured after 3 months. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient's satisfaction | 1 month after expertise by dermatologist | An investigator will call patients by telephone and assess their satisfaction with their care for the dermatologic condition using a simple rating scale with 4 items ranging from Not satisfied (1) to very satisfied (4). |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Physicians satisfaction with teledermatology | 3 months | questionnaire at the end of the study using simple rating scales ranging from Not satisfied (1) to very satisfied (4) |
| Number of non usable photographs in teledermatology group | 3 months | Number of non usable photographs in teledermatology group. Assessment by dermatologists who received the photograph. Reasons for non usability |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed