Skip to content

Sequential vs. Standard Laser Treatment of Twin-twin Transfusion Syndrome

USFetus Randomized Clinical Trial: Sequential vs. Standard Laser Treatment of Twin-twin Transfusion Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02122328
Enrollment
642
Registered
2014-04-24
Start date
2010-06-09
Completion date
2023-10-31
Last updated
2025-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Twin Twin Transfusion Syndrome

Keywords

Twin twin transfusion syndrome, Sequential laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels

Brief summary

The investigators hypothesize that treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) using sequential laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels (SQLPCV) over the predominant method, selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels (SLPCV), may provide vascular stability to the donor fetus. The primary objective is to evaluate the perinatal outcome, specifically, donor intrauterine survival of TTTS managed by SQLPCV vs. SLPCV in a prospective, randomized trial.

Interventions

PROCEDURESequential laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels.

Sponsors

University of Southern California
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
16 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Gestational age: 16 weeks, 0 days to 26 weeks, 0 days. * Confirmed TTTS patients, who by definition meet the following sonographic criteria: * Single placenta. * Polyhydramnios: maximum vertical pocket ≥ 8 cm in the recipient twin, prior to amniodrainage. * Oligohydramnios: maximum vertical pocket ≤ 2 cm in the donor twin, prior to amniodrainage. * Thin dividing membrane (absence of twin peak sign) or absence of dividing membrane (monoamniotic). * Same gender, if visible. * Quintero Stages 1-4. * Patients choosing laser therapy that have undergone prior therapeutic amniocentesis may be included. * Patients with an anterior placenta may be included. * Triplet gestations with two or three fetuses sharing the same placenta may be included. * Patients must be able to give written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients unable or unwilling to participate in the study or to be followed up. * Patients unable to give written informed consent. * Presence of major congenital anomalies that may not warrant surgery. * Known unbalanced chromosomal complement. * Prior intentional septostomy (purposely making a hole in the dividing membrane). * Ruptured membranes. * Chorioamnionitis. * Abnormal intracranial ultrasound findings of either fetus to include, but not limited to: intraventricular hemorrhage, porencephalic cysts, hydrocephalus, Dandy-Walker syndrome, holoprosencephaly and agenesis of the corpus callosum. Isolated ventriculomegaly (atrium 10-19 mm) may or may not be used as

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To compare donor intrauterine survival (alive at birth) for those undergoing SQLPCV vs. SLPCV.BirthA comparison of donor survival at birth will be made between subjects assigned to the sequential (SQLPCV) procedure versus those assigned to the selective (SLPCV) procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Surgical complications21 post-operative days

Other

MeasureTime frame
Fetal/neonatal/infant outcomesBirth to 6 months of life

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026