Skip to content

A Safety and Efficacy Study of Dexamethasone Versus Laser Photocoagulation in Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema

Dexamethasone Posterior Segment Drug Delivery System Versus Laser Photocoagulation in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02121262
Enrollment
284
Registered
2014-04-23
Start date
2016-01-08
Completion date
2019-11-01
Last updated
2020-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Macular Edema

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of 700 μg dexamethasone versus laser photocoagulation in participants with diabetic macular edema (DME).

Interventions

DRUGDexamethasone

Dexamethasone 700 μg intravitreal injection in the study eye on Day 1, Months 5, and 10.

PROCEDURELaser Photocoagulation

Laser photocoagulation on Day 1, and on Months 3, 6, and 9, if retreatment indicated.

Sponsors

Tigermed Consulting Co., Ltd
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2) * Presence of macular edema

Exclusion criteria

* Anticipated need for ocular surgery in the study eye during the study * Laser photocoagulation in the study eye within 3 months * Cataract surgery within 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Change From Baseline (CFB) in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeBaseline to Month 12BCVA was measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The eligible eye with worse visual acuity was selected as the study eye. The average change was computed by subtracting the baseline BCVA from the area under the BCVA curve (AUC) divided by the total follow-up time for each participant. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was used for the analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Improvement ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study EyeBaseline to Month 12BCVA was measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The eligible eye with worse visual acuity was selected as the study eye.
Change From Baseline in CRT by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) in the Study EyeBaseline to Month 12CRT was assessed using SD-OCT, a non-invasive diagnostic system that provides high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. SD-OCT is performed in the study eye after pupil dilation. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from baseline indicates worsening. The eligible eye with worse visual acuity was selected as the study eye. ANCOVA model was used for the analysis.
Change From Baseline in Total Macular Leakage Area by FA in the Study EyeBaseline to Month 12FA is a technique for examining the circulation of the retina (and detecting any leakage) using a dye-tracing method. Early and transit images were taken of the study eye. Mid- and late-phase images were taken of the study and non-study eye. Electronic FA images were collected for evaluation by a reading center. The eligible eye with worse visual acuity was selected as the study eye. ANCOVA model was used for the analysis.

Countries

China, Philippines

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Laser Photocoagulation
Laser photocoagulation was administered in the study eye on Day 1, and on Months 3, 6, and 9, if retreatment indicated.
127
Dexamethasone
Dexamethasone 700 μg was administered as intravitreal injection in the study eye on Day 1, Months 5, and 10.
145
Total272

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event63
Overall StudyConsent Withdrawn10
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy30
Overall StudyParticipant Dropped-out01
Overall StudyParticipant was Deemed Unsuitable10
Overall StudyPersonal Reasons195
Overall StudyProtocol Violation11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDexamethasoneLaser PhotocoagulationTotal
Age, Continuous59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.08
59.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.73
59.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.91
BCVA in the Study Eye55.7 letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.44
55.1 letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.32
55.4 letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.91
Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) in the Study Eye491.2 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 160.8
482.1 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 154.39
486.9 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 157.61
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Chinese
129 Participants113 Participants242 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Other
16 Participants14 Participants30 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
145 Participants127 Participants272 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
64 Participants69 Participants133 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
81 Participants58 Participants139 Participants
Total Macular Leakage Area by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in the Study Eye29.644 mm^230.076 mm^229.8 mm^2

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1292 / 145
other
Total, other adverse events
51 / 12999 / 145
serious
Total, serious adverse events
21 / 12935 / 145

Outcome results

Primary

Average Change From Baseline (CFB) in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye

BCVA was measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The eligible eye with worse visual acuity was selected as the study eye. The average change was computed by subtracting the baseline BCVA from the area under the BCVA curve (AUC) divided by the total follow-up time for each participant. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was used for the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 12

Population: mITT population included all randomized and treated participants with at least one postbaseline BCVA measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Laser PhotocoagulationAverage Change From Baseline (CFB) in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye1.4 lettersStandard Error 0.65
DexamethasoneAverage Change From Baseline (CFB) in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye4.3 lettersStandard Error 0.61
p-value: 0.001195% CI: [1.17, 4.66]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CRT by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) in the Study Eye

CRT was assessed using SD-OCT, a non-invasive diagnostic system that provides high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. SD-OCT is performed in the study eye after pupil dilation. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from baseline indicates worsening. The eligible eye with worse visual acuity was selected as the study eye. ANCOVA model was used for the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 12

Population: mITT population included all randomized and treated participants with at least one postbaseline BCVA measurement. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Laser PhotocoagulationChange From Baseline in CRT by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) in the Study Eye-120.3 micronsStandard Error 13.2
DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in CRT by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) in the Study Eye-209.5 micronsStandard Error 12.27
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-122.53, -56.01]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Macular Leakage Area by FA in the Study Eye

FA is a technique for examining the circulation of the retina (and detecting any leakage) using a dye-tracing method. Early and transit images were taken of the study eye. Mid- and late-phase images were taken of the study and non-study eye. Electronic FA images were collected for evaluation by a reading center. The eligible eye with worse visual acuity was selected as the study eye. ANCOVA model was used for the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 12

Population: mITT population included all randomized and treated participants with at least one postbaseline BCVA measurement. LOCF was used. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Laser PhotocoagulationChange From Baseline in Total Macular Leakage Area by FA in the Study Eye-0.637 mm^2Standard Error 0.8133
DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in Total Macular Leakage Area by FA in the Study Eye-8.367 mm^2Standard Error 0.7482
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-9.7855, -5.6733]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BCVA Improvement ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye

BCVA was measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The eligible eye with worse visual acuity was selected as the study eye.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 12

Population: mITT population included all randomized and treated participants with at least one postbaseline BCVA measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Laser PhotocoagulationPercentage of Participants With BCVA Improvement ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye10.2 percentage of participants
DexamethasonePercentage of Participants With BCVA Improvement ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye11.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.743195% CI: [-5.9, 8.9]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026