Skip to content

A Working Memory Training in Burnout Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02119962
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2014-04-22
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Burnout

Keywords

burnout, working memory, working memory training, cognitive behavioral therapy, executive control

Brief summary

Burnout patients show deficient working memory functioning. Several studies showed a training can increase working memory capacity. In the current study we explored whether training working memory can reduce burnout and burnout related symptoms and increase working memory capacity.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALWorking memory training

Sponsors

HSK
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Erasmus Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Primary purpose
TREATMENT

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 67 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* undifferentiated somatoform disorder with a work related cause

Exclusion criteria

* age which exceeded the range of 18 to 67 years * a severe major depressive episode * substance dependence or abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Utrechtse Burnout Scale (UBOS) score on pre and post training and two months after trainingBaseline, post (4 weeks after baseline), after last session of cognitive behavioral therapy and follow-up (2 months after post-test)The Dutch translation of the Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey (Schaufeli, Leiter, Maslach, & Jackson, 1996), the Utrechtse Burnout Scale-A, measures the severity of burnout symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (CFQ) score on pre and post training and two months after trainingBaseline, post (4 weeks after baseline), after last session of cognitive behavioral therapy and follow-up (2 months after post-test)The Cognitive Failure Questionnarie measures the frequency of participants' experienced cognitive failures regarding memory, action, perception and attention.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90) score on pre and post training and two months after trainingBaseline, post (4 weeks after baseline), after last session of cognitive behavioral therapy and follow-up (2 months after post-test)The Dutch version of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (Derogatis, 1977) is a 90-item self-report questionnaire which measures psychosocial distress of the last week - including the day of testing - on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely).
Change in Digit Span score on pre and post training and two months after trainingBaseline, post (4 weeks after baseline), after last session of cognitive behavioral therapy and follow-up (2 months after post-test)The Digit Span consists of two parts with 14 trials each: the forward Digit Span measures short term memory, whereas the backward version measures WM.
Change in Reading Span partial-credit unit score on pre and post training and two months after trainingBaseline, post (4 weeks after baseline), after last session of cognitive behavioral therapy and follow-up (2 months after post-test)The Reading Span assesses the processing and storage functions of WM (Shipstead et al., 2012).

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactSabine Wanmaker, MSc
wanmaker@fsw.eur.nl0031616427805

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026