Skip to content

Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of YVOIRE® Contour Compared With Restylane SubQ™ Injected Into the Anteromedial Malar Region

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02119780
Enrollment
83
Registered
2014-04-22
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Normal, Healthy Adults With Moderate, Severe, or Very Severe Volume Loss of Anteromedial Malar Region

Brief summary

This study is purposed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of YVOIRE® contour compared with Restylane SubQ™ injected into the anteromedial malar region.

Interventions

DEVICEYVOIRE® contour

YVOIRE® contour injection into the anteromedial malar region

DEVICERestylane SubQ™

Restylane SubQ™ injection into the anteromedial malar region

Sponsors

LG Life Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Be male or female, 20-65 years of age * Have anteromedial malar region volume loss as grade 2, 3, or 4 on the Mid Face Aesthetic Scale (MFAS) symmetrically on both sides * Desire filler treatment to correct volume loss in the anteromedial malar region * Accept the obligation not to receive any other mid facial procedures or treatments during the study * Signed informed consent * Those who fall under one of the following 3 cases 1. Males or females who are surgically sterile 2. Post-menopausal females who are above 45 years of age and 2 years after the last menstruation 3. Fertile premenopausal females or males without having a surgical sterilization, who have agreed to use at least two contraception methods (one of the barrier methods must be included) for up to 14 days after the last treatment of the investigational device to avoid pregnancy

Exclusion criteria

* Have a history of hypertrophic scars or keloids * Other criteria as identified in the protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mid Face Aesthetic Scale (MFAS) score26 weeks after treatmentMean of MFAS score as assessed by the independent blinded rater

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mid Face Aesthetic Scale (MFAS) score2, 14, and 52 weeks after treatmentMean of MFAS score as assessed by the independent blinded rater
Mid Face Aesthetic Scale (MFAS) Responder rate2, 14, 26, and 52 weeks after treatmentMFAS Responder (at least a one-point improvement on the MFAS) rate as assessed by the independent blinded rater
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) score2, 14, 26, and 52 weeks after treatmentMean of GAIS score as assessed by subject
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Responder rate2, 14, 26, and 52 weeks after treatmentGAIS Responder (at least a one-point improvement on the GAIS) rate as assessed by subject

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026