Skip to content

Ruxolitinib in Combination With Pemetrexed/Cisplatin in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase 2 Study of Ruxolitinib or Placebo in Combination With Pemetrexed/Cisplatin and Pemetrexed Maintenance for Initial Treatment of Subjects With Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Is Stage IIIB, Stage IV, or Recurrent

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02119650
Enrollment
76
Registered
2014-04-22
Start date
2014-02-11
Completion date
2016-06-21
Last updated
2018-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

NSCLC (Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma)

Keywords

Non small cell lung cancer

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to determine if ruxolitinib, in combination with Pemetrexed/Cisplatin and Pemetrexed Maintenance, is safe and effective in the treatment of nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is Stage IIIB, Stage IV, or recurrent.

Detailed description

The study consisted of an open-label, safety run-in (consisting of 1 to 4 cohorts of 9 participants each), to confirm the safety of ruxolitinib in combination with pemetrexed/cisplatin in participants with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is Stage IIIB, Stage IV, or recurrent. Participants in the safety run-in received open-label ruxolitinib and pemetrexed and cisplatin. In the second part of the study, participants enrolled and randomized and received pemetrexed and cisplatin (open-label) and either ruxolitinib or placebo in a blinded manner. The dose of ruxolitinib administered was determined from the data produced in the safety run-in phase. Treatment consisted of repeating 21-day cycles. Participants received infusions of pemetrexed and cisplatin on Day 1 of each cycle and ruxolitinib/placebo was self-administered during the entire cycle. Maintenance therapy with ruxolitinib or placebo in combination with pemetrexed, based on the original treatment assignment, was allowed for participants eligible for maintenance therapy.

Interventions

DRUGRuxolitinib

5 mg tablets to be administered by mouth at dose selected from safety run-in phase (Ruxolitinib 15 mg twice daily (BID))

DRUGPlacebo

5 mg matching placebo tablets to be administered by mouth

DRUGPemetrexed

500 mg/m\^2 administered as an intravenous infusion over 10 minutes

DRUGCisplatin

75 mg/m\^2 infused over 2 hours beginning 30 ± 5 minutes after the end of the pemetrexed infusion

Sponsors

Incyte Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of nonsquamous NSCLC that is Stage IIIB Stage IV, or recurrent after prior definitive intervention (radiation, surgery, or chemoradiation therapy, with or without adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy). * Radiographically measurable or evaluable disease. * Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks. * Tumor without activating driver mutations for which there is available therapy (eg, tumor without mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor or anaplastic lymphoma). * An modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) of 1 or 2 as defined below: * Criteria: * C-reactive protein \>10 mg/L AND albumin ≥35 g/L; Score = 1 * C-reactive protein \>10 mg L AND albumin \<35 g/L; Score = 2 * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 1. * Adequate renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function demonstrated by protocol-specified laboratory parameters at the screening visit.

Exclusion criteria

* Squamous or mixed histology (eg, adenosquamous) NSCLC * Previous systemic therapy for advanced or metastatic disease. * Known active central nervous system (CNS) metastases. * Current or previous other malignancy within 2 years of study entry, except cured basal or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, prostate intraepithelial neoplasm, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or other noninvasive or indolent malignancy without sponsor approval. * Current uncontrolled cardiac disease such as angina or myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure including New York Heart Association functional classification of 3, or arrhythmia requiring treatment. * Uncontrolled concomitant medical conditions, including, but not limited to, renal, hepatic, hematologic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, neurological, cerebral, or psychiatric diseases.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)Randomization until death due to any cause; up to 16 months or data cutoff 11FEB2016.Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without death observed at the time of the analysis were censored at last date known to be alive. The median overall survival time was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall survival was compared between treatment groups using log-rank test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Randomization to disease progression, or death due to any cause if sooner; up to 16 months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.PFS is defined as the time from randomization until the earliest date of disease progression determined by investigator assessment of objective radiographic disease assessments per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, or death due to any cause if sooner. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum Longest Diameter (LD) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, unequivocal progression of non-target lesions or increase in disease burden for subjects with only nonmeasurable disease.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)Baseline through end of study; up to 16 months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.Objective response rate determined by radiographic disease assessments per RECIST (v1.1), by investigator assessment and was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) at any post baseline visit. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) for target lesions and assessed by computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) : Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions with no worsening of non-target lesions and no new lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Duration of ResponseFrom the start of response to the end of response; up to 16 months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.For objective responders, the duration of response is defined as the difference of the end of response and the start of response. The start of a response was the first visit where the subject achieves PR or better based on RECIST v1.1 criteria. The end of response was the first visit after PD based on RECIST v1.1 criteria.
Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Baseline through approximately 30 days post treatment discontinuation; up to 16 months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an event occurring (or worsening of any pre-existing) after exposure to at least 1 dose of study drug. A treatment-related AE was defined as an event with a definite, probable, or possible causality to study medication. A serious AE is an event resulting in death, hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is life threatening, a congenital anomaly/birth defect or requires medical or surgical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes above. The intensity of an AE was graded according to the National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03: Grade 1 (Mild); Grade 2 (Moderate); Grade 3 (Severe); Grade 4 (life-threatening).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 42 study centers (25 in the United States, 4 in Spain, 3 in France, 3 in Portugal, 2 in Denmark, 2 in Germany, 2 in Italy, 1 in the Netherlands).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/Cisplatin
Ruxolitinib was self-administered as a 15 mg BID oral treatment during the randomized, double-blind treatment, without regard to food. Pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 was administered as an intravenous infusion over 10 minutes, and 75 mg/m\^2 Cisplatin was infused over 2 hours beginning 30 ± 5 minutes after the end of the pemetrexed infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle (Treatment Cycles).
39
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/Cisplatin
Matching placebo was self-administered as a 15 mg BID oral treatment during the randomized, double-blind treatment, without regard to food. Pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 was administered as an intravenous infusion over 10 minutes, and 75 mg/m\^2 Cisplatin was infused over 2 hours beginning 30 ± 5 minutes after the end of the pemetrexed infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle (Treatment Cycles).
37
Total76

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event34
Overall StudyDeath51
Overall StudyDisease progression1114
Overall StudyMultiple reasons for termination21
Overall StudyNoncompliance with study treatment11
Overall StudyPhysician Decision02
Overall StudyStudy terminated by the sponsor10
Overall StudySubject decision23

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDouble-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinDouble-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinTotal
Age, Continuous61.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.85
62.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.55
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.65
Body Mass Index (BMI)27.67 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.402
27.65 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.26
27.66 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.787
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
36 Participants33 Participants69 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants14 Participants29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants23 Participants47 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
37 / 3936 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
19 / 3916 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without death observed at the time of the analysis were censored at last date known to be alive. The median overall survival time was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall survival was compared between treatment groups using log-rank test.

Time frame: Randomization until death due to any cause; up to 16 months or data cutoff 11FEB2016.

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of participants that were randomized in the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinOverall Survival (OS)7.5 months
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinOverall Survival (OS)5.9 months
p-value: 0.756280% CI: [0.509, 1.51]Log Rank
Secondary

Duration of Response

For objective responders, the duration of response is defined as the difference of the end of response and the start of response. The start of a response was the first visit where the subject achieves PR or better based on RECIST v1.1 criteria. The end of response was the first visit after PD based on RECIST v1.1 criteria.

Time frame: From the start of response to the end of response; up to 16 months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of participants that were randomized in the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinDuration of Response20.14 weeks
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinDuration of Response12.14 weeks
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Objective response rate determined by radiographic disease assessments per RECIST (v1.1), by investigator assessment and was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) at any post baseline visit. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) for target lesions and assessed by computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) : Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions with no worsening of non-target lesions and no new lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.

Time frame: Baseline through end of study; up to 16 months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of participants that were randomized in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinObjective Response Rate (ORR)Partial Response12 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinObjective Response Rate (ORR)Progressive Disease6 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinObjective Response Rate (ORR)Complete Response0 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinObjective Response Rate (ORR)Unable to Evaluate2 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinObjective Response Rate (ORR)Stable Disease4 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinObjective Response Rate (ORR)Not Assessed15 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinObjective Response Rate (ORR)Overall Response12 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinObjective Response Rate (ORR)Not Assessed12 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinObjective Response Rate (ORR)Overall Response13 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinObjective Response Rate (ORR)Complete Response0 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinObjective Response Rate (ORR)Partial Response13 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinObjective Response Rate (ORR)Stable Disease5 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinObjective Response Rate (ORR)Progressive Disease4 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinObjective Response Rate (ORR)Unable to Evaluate3 Participants
Secondary

Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an event occurring (or worsening of any pre-existing) after exposure to at least 1 dose of study drug. A treatment-related AE was defined as an event with a definite, probable, or possible causality to study medication. A serious AE is an event resulting in death, hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is life threatening, a congenital anomaly/birth defect or requires medical or surgical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes above. The intensity of an AE was graded according to the National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03: Grade 1 (Mild); Grade 2 (Moderate); Grade 3 (Severe); Grade 4 (life-threatening).

Time frame: Baseline through approximately 30 days post treatment discontinuation; up to 16 months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.

Population: The safety evaluable population consisted of all participants exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any serious TEAE19 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants who discontinued drug due to TEAEs2 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with a fatal TEAE4 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants who interrupted drug due to TEAEs11 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants who had treatment-related TEAEs16 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Discontinued reference therapy due to TEAEs4 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs related to reference therapy30 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Interrupted reference therapy due to TEAEs8 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants who had Grade 3 or higher TEAEs25 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants given concomitant meds due to TEAEs36 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants who were hospitalized due to TEAEs16 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Procedure/nondrug therapy due to TEAEs17 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants who had any TEAEs39 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Procedure/nondrug therapy due to TEAEs12 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants who had any TEAEs36 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants who had treatment-related TEAEs28 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any serious TEAE16 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants who had Grade 3 or higher TEAEs22 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with a fatal TEAE4 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs related to reference therapy35 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants who were hospitalized due to TEAEs15 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants who discontinued drug due to TEAEs4 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants who interrupted drug due to TEAEs15 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Discontinued reference therapy due to TEAEs7 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Interrupted reference therapy due to TEAEs7 Participants
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinParticipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants given concomitant meds due to TEAEs32 Participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from randomization until the earliest date of disease progression determined by investigator assessment of objective radiographic disease assessments per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, or death due to any cause if sooner. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum Longest Diameter (LD) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, unequivocal progression of non-target lesions or increase in disease burden for subjects with only nonmeasurable disease.

Time frame: Randomization to disease progression, or death due to any cause if sooner; up to 16 months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of participants that were randomized in the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Double-Blind Treatment: Ruxolitinib + Pemetrexed/CisplatinProgression-free Survival (PFS)NA Months
Double-Blind Treatment: Placebo Plus Pemetrexed/CisplatinProgression-free Survival (PFS)NA Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026