Skip to content

Treatment of Schizophrenia With L-tetrahydropalmatine (l-THP): a Novel Dopamine Antagonist With Anti-inflammatory and Antiprotozoal Activity

Treatment of Schizophrenia With L-tetrahydropalmatine (l-THP): a Novel Dopamine Antagonist With Anti-inflammatory and Antiprotozoal Activity

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02118610
Enrollment
63
Registered
2014-04-21
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2019-06-30
Last updated
2022-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Brief summary

Schizophrenia is a devastating and complex illness, with multiple symptom and behavioral manifestations. Antipsychotic medications are the mainstay of treatment; however, many patients only partially respond to treatment. Development of new treatment has not progressed rapidly, in part, because the underlying etiopathophysiology of the illness is not well understood. To date, all pharmacological treatments approved for use in schizophrenia involve primary modulation of the dopamine system. Many agents without dopamine action have failed to demonstrate efficacy. There is growing evidence that schizophrenia may be, in part, due to an inflammatory process and pharmacological treatment approaches that decrease inflammation have shown promise. Thus, treatments that may have anti-inflammatory properties (e.g., TNF-alpha inhibition), but also possess dopamine modulation may prove to be beneficial. This novel medication, l-tetrahydropalmatine (l-THP), has robust anti-inflammatory properties, particularly TNF-alpha and ICAM inhibition; has antiprotozoal activity; and possesses an antipsychotic-like pharmacological profile of D1, D2 and D3 receptor antagonism. The high affinity of l-THP for D1 versus D2 receptors distinguishes it from first generation antipsychotics and its D1 to D2 ratio resembles that of the superior antipsychotic, clozapine. Also, an almost identical compound, l-stepholindine (l-SPD), demonstrates robust antipsychotic activity in humans (both positive and negative symptoms) and is currently used clinically in China. l-THP has been used for over 40 years clinically in China, has a good safety profile to date, and represents a novel and exciting mechanism for schizophrenia treatment. Initial safety data from our phase I study of l-THP (20 healthy controls) shows excellent tolerability and lack of any substantial side effects. L-THP has been tested in outpatient drug abuse trials for 4 weeks with good safety data, (Hu et al 2006, Yang et al 2003). Yang et al (2003) randomized this medication in over 120 participants for 4 weeks with 4 week observation without any notable side effects. We will test this compound (30 mg BID) as an adjunct treatment in a randomized, double-blind, 4-week trial, in which we will assess treatment efficacy, changes in peripheral cytokine concentrations, and, secondarily, antiprotozoal effects, (antibody titers to Toxoplasma gondii), an infection that is known to occur at higher rates in schizophrenia than healthy controls and may be related in part to the illness.

Interventions

DRUGL-tetrahydropalmatine (30mg)

Active comparator

DRUGSugar pill

Placebo

Sponsors

Stanley Medical Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder 2. Minimum score of 45 on the total Brief Psychiatric Rating scale or a CGI of 4 3. Age 18-64 years 4. Currently taking antipsychotic regimen with no dose changes in last 30 days 5. Ability to consent determined by a score of 10 or greater on the Evaluation to Sign Consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Women who are pregnant, nursing, or not using effective contraception (if capable of getting pregnant) 2. Current organic brain disorder or mental retardation 3. Medical condition whose pathology or treatment could alter the presentation or treatment of schizophrenia or significantly increase the risk associated with study medication. This includes HIV, kidney disease, congestive heart failure, pheochromocytoma, untreated hyperthyroidism, dehydration, fever, uncorrected congenital heart defect, seizures, electrolyte imbalance, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, porphyria variegate, superventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, or cancer. This also may include other medical conditions where the medically accountable investigator in the study does not think it would be in the best interest of the participant to participate in the study. 4. Current (past month) substance abuse or dependence (DSM-IV criteria) other than nicotine or caffeine; substance use, per se, will not be exclusionary 5. Inability to provide valid informed consent 6. Inability to understand English 7. Inability to cooperate with study procedures 8. Taking herbal or homeopathic medications where the metabolism of the drug is not known

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Positive and Negative Symptom ImprovementBaseline and 4 weeks (endpoint)Measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, positive symptom subfactor, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS). The total BPRS score is calculated by adding the scores for scales #1-#18. Each scale ranges from 1=Not Present to 7=Very Severe. Total scores range from a minimum score of 18 to a maximum score of 126. A higher total score indicates a more severe psychiatric symptom rating.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in Cognitive FunctionBaseline and 4 weeks (endpoint)Neuropsychological testing will be done at baseline and endpoint using the MATRICS battery. A composite score as well as individual scores will be will be the outcome. This assessment total minimum score of -10 and maximum score of 80. The higher the score the better the outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
L-tetrahydropalmatine
l-tetrahydropalmatine (30 mg BID) L-tetrahydropalmatine (30mg): Active comparator
29
Sugar Pill
Sugar pill: Placebo
32
Total61

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicL-tetrahydropalmatineSugar PillTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants32 Participants61 Participants
Age, Continuous41.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
41.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
41.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.52
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
18 Participants17 Participants35 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
9 Participants13 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 participants32 participants61 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants9 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants23 Participants43 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 290 / 32
other
Total, other adverse events
29 / 2932 / 32
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 291 / 32

Outcome results

Primary

Positive and Negative Symptom Improvement

Measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, positive symptom subfactor, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS). The total BPRS score is calculated by adding the scores for scales #1-#18. Each scale ranges from 1=Not Present to 7=Very Severe. Total scores range from a minimum score of 18 to a maximum score of 126. A higher total score indicates a more severe psychiatric symptom rating.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (endpoint)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
L-tetrahydropalmatinePositive and Negative Symptom ImprovementBaseline41.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.8
L-tetrahydropalmatinePositive and Negative Symptom ImprovementEndpoint36.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Sugar PillPositive and Negative Symptom ImprovementBaseline40.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Sugar PillPositive and Negative Symptom ImprovementEndpoint37.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
Secondary

Improvement in Cognitive Function

Neuropsychological testing will be done at baseline and endpoint using the MATRICS battery. A composite score as well as individual scores will be will be the outcome. This assessment total minimum score of -10 and maximum score of 80. The higher the score the better the outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (endpoint)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
L-tetrahydropalmatineImprovement in Cognitive FunctionBaseline28.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
L-tetrahydropalmatineImprovement in Cognitive FunctionEndpoint28.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
Sugar PillImprovement in Cognitive FunctionBaseline27.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
Sugar PillImprovement in Cognitive FunctionEndpoint29.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026