Schizophrenia
Conditions
Brief summary
Schizophrenia is a devastating and complex illness, with multiple symptom and behavioral manifestations. Antipsychotic medications are the mainstay of treatment; however, many patients only partially respond to treatment. Development of new treatment has not progressed rapidly, in part, because the underlying etiopathophysiology of the illness is not well understood. To date, all pharmacological treatments approved for use in schizophrenia involve primary modulation of the dopamine system. Many agents without dopamine action have failed to demonstrate efficacy. There is growing evidence that schizophrenia may be, in part, due to an inflammatory process and pharmacological treatment approaches that decrease inflammation have shown promise. Thus, treatments that may have anti-inflammatory properties (e.g., TNF-alpha inhibition), but also possess dopamine modulation may prove to be beneficial. This novel medication, l-tetrahydropalmatine (l-THP), has robust anti-inflammatory properties, particularly TNF-alpha and ICAM inhibition; has antiprotozoal activity; and possesses an antipsychotic-like pharmacological profile of D1, D2 and D3 receptor antagonism. The high affinity of l-THP for D1 versus D2 receptors distinguishes it from first generation antipsychotics and its D1 to D2 ratio resembles that of the superior antipsychotic, clozapine. Also, an almost identical compound, l-stepholindine (l-SPD), demonstrates robust antipsychotic activity in humans (both positive and negative symptoms) and is currently used clinically in China. l-THP has been used for over 40 years clinically in China, has a good safety profile to date, and represents a novel and exciting mechanism for schizophrenia treatment. Initial safety data from our phase I study of l-THP (20 healthy controls) shows excellent tolerability and lack of any substantial side effects. L-THP has been tested in outpatient drug abuse trials for 4 weeks with good safety data, (Hu et al 2006, Yang et al 2003). Yang et al (2003) randomized this medication in over 120 participants for 4 weeks with 4 week observation without any notable side effects. We will test this compound (30 mg BID) as an adjunct treatment in a randomized, double-blind, 4-week trial, in which we will assess treatment efficacy, changes in peripheral cytokine concentrations, and, secondarily, antiprotozoal effects, (antibody titers to Toxoplasma gondii), an infection that is known to occur at higher rates in schizophrenia than healthy controls and may be related in part to the illness.
Interventions
Active comparator
Placebo
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder 2. Minimum score of 45 on the total Brief Psychiatric Rating scale or a CGI of 4 3. Age 18-64 years 4. Currently taking antipsychotic regimen with no dose changes in last 30 days 5. Ability to consent determined by a score of 10 or greater on the Evaluation to Sign Consent
Exclusion criteria
1. Women who are pregnant, nursing, or not using effective contraception (if capable of getting pregnant) 2. Current organic brain disorder or mental retardation 3. Medical condition whose pathology or treatment could alter the presentation or treatment of schizophrenia or significantly increase the risk associated with study medication. This includes HIV, kidney disease, congestive heart failure, pheochromocytoma, untreated hyperthyroidism, dehydration, fever, uncorrected congenital heart defect, seizures, electrolyte imbalance, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, porphyria variegate, superventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, or cancer. This also may include other medical conditions where the medically accountable investigator in the study does not think it would be in the best interest of the participant to participate in the study. 4. Current (past month) substance abuse or dependence (DSM-IV criteria) other than nicotine or caffeine; substance use, per se, will not be exclusionary 5. Inability to provide valid informed consent 6. Inability to understand English 7. Inability to cooperate with study procedures 8. Taking herbal or homeopathic medications where the metabolism of the drug is not known
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Positive and Negative Symptom Improvement | Baseline and 4 weeks (endpoint) | Measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, positive symptom subfactor, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS). The total BPRS score is calculated by adding the scores for scales #1-#18. Each scale ranges from 1=Not Present to 7=Very Severe. Total scores range from a minimum score of 18 to a maximum score of 126. A higher total score indicates a more severe psychiatric symptom rating. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement in Cognitive Function | Baseline and 4 weeks (endpoint) | Neuropsychological testing will be done at baseline and endpoint using the MATRICS battery. A composite score as well as individual scores will be will be the outcome. This assessment total minimum score of -10 and maximum score of 80. The higher the score the better the outcome. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| L-tetrahydropalmatine l-tetrahydropalmatine (30 mg BID)
L-tetrahydropalmatine (30mg): Active comparator | 29 |
| Sugar Pill Sugar pill: Placebo | 32 |
| Total | 61 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | L-tetrahydropalmatine | Sugar Pill | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 29 Participants | 32 Participants | 61 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 41.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 | 41.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 | 41.65 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.52 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black | 18 Participants | 17 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 9 Participants | 13 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 29 participants | 32 participants | 61 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 9 Participants | 9 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 20 Participants | 23 Participants | 43 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 29 | 0 / 32 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 29 / 29 | 32 / 32 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 29 | 1 / 32 |
Outcome results
Positive and Negative Symptom Improvement
Measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, positive symptom subfactor, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS). The total BPRS score is calculated by adding the scores for scales #1-#18. Each scale ranges from 1=Not Present to 7=Very Severe. Total scores range from a minimum score of 18 to a maximum score of 126. A higher total score indicates a more severe psychiatric symptom rating.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (endpoint)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L-tetrahydropalmatine | Positive and Negative Symptom Improvement | Baseline | 41.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.8 |
| L-tetrahydropalmatine | Positive and Negative Symptom Improvement | Endpoint | 36.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9 |
| Sugar Pill | Positive and Negative Symptom Improvement | Baseline | 40.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| Sugar Pill | Positive and Negative Symptom Improvement | Endpoint | 37.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.7 |
Improvement in Cognitive Function
Neuropsychological testing will be done at baseline and endpoint using the MATRICS battery. A composite score as well as individual scores will be will be the outcome. This assessment total minimum score of -10 and maximum score of 80. The higher the score the better the outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (endpoint)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L-tetrahydropalmatine | Improvement in Cognitive Function | Baseline | 28.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.9 |
| L-tetrahydropalmatine | Improvement in Cognitive Function | Endpoint | 28.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.1 |
| Sugar Pill | Improvement in Cognitive Function | Baseline | 27.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.1 |
| Sugar Pill | Improvement in Cognitive Function | Endpoint | 29.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.7 |