Skip to content

Impact of Multidisciplinary Review of Drug Prescriptions on Patient Safety in a Residence for Dependent Elderly

Impact of Multidisciplinary Review of Drug Prescriptions on Patient Safety in a Residence for Dependent Elderly

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02118259
Acronym
Rev-EHPAD
Enrollment
49
Registered
2014-04-21
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2015-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Geriatrics, Health Services for the Aged, Residence for Dependent Elderly

Keywords

Multidisciplinary review of drug prescriptions, Adverse drug events geriatric risk score, Residence for dependent elderly

Brief summary

The main objective of the study is to show that the multidisciplinary review of drug prescriptions changes the adverse drug event (ADE) geriatric risk score (according to Trivalle and Ducimetière 2013) for patients living in the Nîmes University Hospital Residence for Dependent Elderly.

Detailed description

The secondary objectives of this study are to assess and compare the following criteria before and after multidisciplinary review of drug prescriptions for patients in the Nîmes University Hospital Residence for Dependent Elderly: A. the number of patients with at least one potentially inappropriate drug prescribed B. the number of hospitalizations C. death rate D. the number of falls per patient and the rate of fallers E. qualitative criteria describing the drug review F. associated care costs

Interventions

The before-after study is composed of a first observational phase followed by a proactive phase, and then finally by a second observational phase. The first observational phase corresponds to retrospective data-collecting for the information necessary for calculating the baseline ADE geriatric risk score. The proactive phase corresponds to a multidisciplinary review of drug prescriptions (especially long-term drugs) for all included patients in the residence. During the second observational phase, the same data as in the first observational phase will be collected a second time.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient (or his/her legal representative) must have given his/her informed and signed consent * The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan * The patient is available for 6 months of follow-up * The patient has resided at the Nîmes University Hospital Residence for Dependent Elderly for at least the past 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* The patient is participating in another study * The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study * The patient is under judicial protection * The patient (or his/her legal representative) refuses to sign the consent * It is impossible to correctly inform the patient (or his/her legal representative) * The patient has resided at the Nîmes University Hospital Residence for Dependent Elderly for less than 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse Drug Events Geriatric Risk Scorechange from Baseline to 6 monthsaccording to Trivalle and Ducimetière 2013

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of hospitalizations in the public sector (higher level care)first observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
Days of hospitalization in the public sector (higher level care)first observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
Mortalityfirst observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
The number of falls per patientfirst observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
The percentage of patients who fellfirst observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
The number of patients taking at least 1 potentially inappropriate drug according to Laroche criteriaDuring the proactive phase. Day 0.Laroche et al 2007.
The type of errors detected during drug reviewduring the proactive phase (day 0)Contra-indication, dosing, route, etc
The type of modification suggested during drug reviewduring the proactive phase (day 0)discontinuation, addition, substitution...
The acceptation rate for modifications suggested during drug reviewduring the proactive phase (day 0)
Associated care costs (€)first observational phase (month -6 to day 0)
The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification for each revised drugduring the proactive phase (day 0)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026