Skip to content

Study of FX006 vs Normal Saline in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Group, Dose-Ranging Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of FX006 for the Treatment of Pain in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02116972
Enrollment
310
Registered
2014-04-17
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2015-11-30
Last updated
2024-01-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Keywords

osteoarthritis, knee, pain, corticosteroid, intra-articular, injection

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the magnitude and duration of pain relief of a single IA injection of 2 doses (16 and 32 mg) of FX006, an extended-release formulation of TCA, relative to normal saline (placebo control).

Detailed description

This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, dose-ranging, single-dose study. The study was conducted in male and female patients ≥40 years of age with OA of the knee. Approximately 300 patients with OA of the knee were randomized, using a centralized randomization procedure, to 1 of 3 treatment groups (1:1:1) and treated with a single IA injection of: * 16 mg FX006, * 32 mg FX006, or * normal saline (placebo). Each patient was evaluated for a total of 24 weeks following a single IA injection. Following screening, safety and efficacy were evaluated at 7 out-patient visits (Days 1 \[Baseline\], Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24). The study was expected to enroll over approximately 6 to 7 months.

Interventions

Single 5 mL IA injection

DRUGPlacebo

Single 5 mL IA injection

DRUGFX006 16 mg

Single 5 mL IA injection

Sponsors

Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Main Inclusion Criteria: * Willingness and ability to comply with the study procedures and visit schedules and ability to follow verbal and written instructions * Male or female \>=40 years of age * Has documented diagnosis of OA of the index knee made at least 6 months prior to Screening * Currently meets American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria (clinical and radiological) for OA * Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) Grade 2 or 3 in the index knee per Screening X-ray * Qualifying mean score on the 24-h average pain score (0-10 numeric rating scale) * Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 40 kg/m2 * Willingness to abstain from use of restricted medications Main

Exclusion criteria

* Ipsilateral hip OA * Fibromyalgia, chronic pain syndrome or other concurrent medical or arthritic conditions which could interfere with the evaluation of the index knee * History of Reiter's syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease, sarcoidosis or amyloidosis * History of arthritides due to crystals (e.g., gout, pseudogout) * History or clinical signs and symptoms of infection in the index joint * Knee pain that is not clinically attributable to OA of the knee (e.g., radicular low back pain and hip pain that is referred to the knee that could cause misclassification) * Pain in any other area of the lower extremities or back that is equal to or greater than the index knee pain * IA corticosteroid (investigational or marketed) in any joint within 3 months of Screening * IA hyaluronic acid (investigational or marketed) in the index knee within 6 months of Screening * Intramuscular (IM) corticosteroids (investigational or marketed) within 3 months of Screening * Oral corticosteroids (investigational or marketed) within 1 month of Screening * Inhaled, intranasal and topical corticosteroids (investigational or marketed) within 2 weeks of Screening * Any other IA investigational drug/biologic within 6 months of Screening * Prior use of FX006 * Women of child-bearing potential not using effective contraception or who are pregnant or nursing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily (24-hr) Pain Intensity Scores for 32 mg FX006 Versus PlaceboBaseline and Week 12The pain intensity score is measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no painand 10 indicates pain as bad as you can imagine.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 for WOMAC C (Function Subscale)Baseline and Week 12The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC®) Osteoarthritis Index is a questionnaire that measures pain, stiffness, and function both independently and collectively, using a Likert 3.1, 5-point scale. The Likert Scale uses the following descriptors for all items: none, mild moderate, severe, and extreme, corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 for Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Baseline and Week 12The Patient Global Impression of Change is a scale that aims to evaluate all aspects of participants' (patients') health and determining if there has been an improvement or not. The participant selects the one response from the response options that gives the most accurate description of his/her state of health (overall status). This is a 7-point scale, and scores range from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). Lower scores indicate better health status.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 and Then Week 20 and Then Week 24 in the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily (24-hour) Pain Intensity ScoresBaseline and Weeks 16, 20 and 24The pain intensity score is measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates pain as bad as you can imagine.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-C-functionBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20 and 24 (Week 12 data is represented in the secondary outcome measure)The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC®) Osteoarthritis Index is a questionnaire that measures pain, stiffness, and function both independently and collectively, using a Likert 3.1, 5-point scale. The Likert Scale uses the following descriptors for all items: none, mild moderate, severe, and extreme, corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
Change From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-A PainBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC®) Osteoarthritis Index is a questionnaire that measures pain, stiffness, and function both independently and collectively, using a Likert 3.1, 5-point scale. The Likert Scale uses the following descriptors for all items: none, mild moderate, severe, and extreme, corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
Percent of Responders According to Outcomes Measures in OMERACT-OARSI Strict CriteriaWeeks 4, 8 and 12Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials - Osteoarthritis Research Society International. (OMERACT-OARSI) Responders are defined as participants with high improvement in pain or function.
Proportion of Patients Experiencing a >20%, 30% and 50% Decrease in Pain From Baseline in Weekly Mean of the Average Daily (24-hr) Pain Intensity Scores at Week 1212 weeksThe pain intensity score is measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates pain as bad as you can imagine.
Time to Onset of Pain ReliefBaseline up to 24 Weeks after administration of study treatmentTime to onset of pain relief in days is defined as the time from administration of study treatment to the first pain assessment showing \>30% improvement from the weekly average daily pain score at baseline.
Change From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in PGICBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 (Week 12 data reported in secondary outcome measure)The Patient Global Impression of Change is a scale that aims to evaluate all aspects of participants' (patients') health and determining if there has been an improvement or not. The participant selects the one response from the response options that gives the most accurate description of his/her state of health (overall status). This is a 7-point scale, and scores range from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). Lower scores indicate better health status.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 for WOMAC C (Function Subscale)Baseline and Week 12The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC®) Osteoarthritis Index is a questionnaire that measures pain, stiffness, and function both independently and collectively, using a Likert 3.1, 5- point scale. The Likert Scale uses the following descriptors for all items: none, mild moderate, severe, and extreme, corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 for Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Baseline and Week 12The Patient Global Impression of Change is a scale that aims to evaluate all aspects of participants' (patients') health and determining if there has been an improvement or not. The participant selects the one response from the response options that gives the most accurate description of his/her state of health (overall status). This is a 7-point scale, and scores range from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). Lower scores indicate better health status.
Change From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresBaseline and Up to Week 24The pain intensity score is measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates pain as bad as you can imagine.Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24 are specified as the primary and secondary endpoints for the 32 mg group and the placebo group

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were screened for study eligibility at 48 study centers in the United States (US) and Canada. Enrollment took approximately 7 months.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects were screened within 21 days of being randomized

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FX006 16 mg
Single intra-articular injection FX006: Single intra-articular injection
102
FX006 32 mg
Single intra-articular injection FX006: Single intra-articular injection
104
Normal Saline
Single intra-articular injection Normal saline: Single intra-articular injection
100
Total306

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event441
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy665
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up431
Overall StudyProtocol Violation101
Overall Studyscheduling conflicts and relocation336
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject115

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFX006 16 mgFX006 32 mgNormal SalineTotal
Age, Continuous58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.34
58.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.06
59.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.23
58.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Sex: Female, Male
Female
62 Participants51 Participants61 Participants174 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
40 Participants53 Participants39 Participants132 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1020 / 1040 / 100
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 10213 / 10421 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1023 / 1040 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily (24-hr) Pain Intensity Scores for 32 mg FX006 Versus Placebo

The pain intensity score is measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no painand 10 indicates pain as bad as you can imagine.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Randomized patients who received study drug assigned to the FX006 32 mg arm and the placebo arm

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily (24-hr) Pain Intensity Scores for 32 mg FX006 Versus Placebo-3.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.229
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily (24-hr) Pain Intensity Scores for 32 mg FX006 Versus Placebo-2.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.238
Comparison: The step-down testing procedure to control for multiplicity would be voided if the primary endpoint is not met and analyses proceeded for exploratory purposes.p-value: 0.082195% CI: [-1.22, 0.07]Logitudinal mixed effects model
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 for Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

The Patient Global Impression of Change is a scale that aims to evaluate all aspects of participants' (patients') health and determining if there has been an improvement or not. The participant selects the one response from the response options that gives the most accurate description of his/her state of health (overall status). This is a 7-point scale, and scores range from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). Lower scores indicate better health status.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 for Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)2.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 for Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)2.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 for WOMAC C (Function Subscale)

The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC®) Osteoarthritis Index is a questionnaire that measures pain, stiffness, and function both independently and collectively, using a Likert 3.1, 5-point scale. The Likert Scale uses the following descriptors for all items: none, mild moderate, severe, and extreme, corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 for WOMAC C (Function Subscale)-1.01 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.083
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 for WOMAC C (Function Subscale)-0.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.087
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 16 and Then Week 20 and Then Week 24 in the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily (24-hour) Pain Intensity Scores

The pain intensity score is measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates pain as bad as you can imagine.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 16, 20 and 24

Population: Randomized patients who received study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Week 16 and Then Week 20 and Then Week 24 in the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily (24-hour) Pain Intensity ScoresWeek 16-2.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2224
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Week 16 and Then Week 20 and Then Week 24 in the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily (24-hour) Pain Intensity ScoresWeek 20-2.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.233
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Week 16 and Then Week 20 and Then Week 24 in the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily (24-hour) Pain Intensity ScoresWeek 24-2.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.241
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 16 and Then Week 20 and Then Week 24 in the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily (24-hour) Pain Intensity ScoresWeek 16-2.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.234
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 16 and Then Week 20 and Then Week 24 in the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily (24-hour) Pain Intensity ScoresWeek 20-2.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.244
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 16 and Then Week 20 and Then Week 24 in the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily (24-hour) Pain Intensity ScoresWeek 24-2.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.252
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-A Pain

The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC®) Osteoarthritis Index is a questionnaire that measures pain, stiffness, and function both independently and collectively, using a Likert 3.1, 5-point scale. The Likert Scale uses the following descriptors for all items: none, mild moderate, severe, and extreme, corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

Population: Change from baseline to each of Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-A pain for patients assigned to FX006 16 mg arm was not a pre-specified Secondary Outcome and therefore not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-A PainWeek 4-1.11 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-A PainWeek 8-1.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.083
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-A PainWeek 12-0.98 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-A PainWeek 16-0.95 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.083
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-A PainWeek 20-0.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.083
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-A PainWeek 24-0.91 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.084
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-A PainWeek 20-0.84 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-A PainWeek 4-0.64 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-A PainWeek 16-0.80 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.087
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-A PainWeek 8-0.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.087
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-A PainWeek 24-0.78 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-A PainWeek 12-0.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.083
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in PGIC

The Patient Global Impression of Change is a scale that aims to evaluate all aspects of participants' (patients') health and determining if there has been an improvement or not. The participant selects the one response from the response options that gives the most accurate description of his/her state of health (overall status). This is a 7-point scale, and scores range from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). Lower scores indicate better health status.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 (Week 12 data reported in secondary outcome measure)

Population: Change from baseline to each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in PGIC for patients assigned to FX006 16 mg arm was not a pre-specified Secondary Outcome and therefore not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in PGICWeek 82.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in PGICWeek 202.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in PGICWeek 162.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in PGICWeek 242.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in PGICWeek 42.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in PGICWeek 243.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in PGICWeek 43.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in PGICWeek 82.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in PGICWeek 162.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in PGICWeek 202.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-C-function

The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC®) Osteoarthritis Index is a questionnaire that measures pain, stiffness, and function both independently and collectively, using a Likert 3.1, 5-point scale. The Likert Scale uses the following descriptors for all items: none, mild moderate, severe, and extreme, corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20 and 24 (Week 12 data is represented in the secondary outcome measure)

Population: Change from baseline to each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-C-function for patients assigned to FX006 16 mg arm was not a pre-specified Secondary Outcome and therefore not reported

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-C-functionWeek 8-1.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-C-functionWeek 20-0.87 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-C-functionWeek 16-0.94 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.083
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-C-functionWeek 24-0.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.083
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-C-functionWeek 4-1.16 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.079
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-C-functionWeek 24-0.80 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-C-functionWeek 4-0.66 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-C-functionWeek 8-0.74 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-C-functionWeek 16-0.84 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each of Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 in WOMAC-C-functionWeek 20-0.84 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity Scores

The pain intensity score is measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates pain as bad as you can imagine.Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24 are specified as the primary and secondary endpoints for the 32 mg group and the placebo group

Time frame: Baseline and Up to Week 24

Population: Randomized patients who received study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 7-3.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.233
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 2-2.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.218
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 3-2.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.228
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 4-3.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.228
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 5-3.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.222
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 6-3.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.225
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 1-2.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.177
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 8-3.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.237
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 9-3.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.233
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 10-2.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.229
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 11-2.78 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.234
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 12-2.59 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.234
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 13-2.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.234
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 14-2.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.235
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 15-2.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.225
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 16-2.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.231
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 17-2.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.237
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 18-2.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 19-2.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.241
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 20-2.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.241
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 21-2.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.246
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 22-2.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.249
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 23-2.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.258
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 24-2.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.249
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 22-2.53 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 1-1.96 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.175
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 13-3.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.229
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 17-2.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.229
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 2-2.75 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.216
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 11-3.18 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.229
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 21-2.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.237
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 3-2.91 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.226
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 14-2.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.229
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 23-2.40 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.249
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 4-3.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.226
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 10-3.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.224
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 18-2.73 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.232
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 5-3.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.219
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 15-2.91 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.219
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 12-3.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.229
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 6-3.29 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.222
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 9-3.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.229
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 24-2.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.241
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 7-3.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 16-2.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.224
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 19-2.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.233
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 8-3.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.234
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 20-2.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.233
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 8-2.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.242
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 9-2.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.237
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 10-2.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.233
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 11-2.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.238
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 20-2.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.244
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 12-2.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.238
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 23-2.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 13-2.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.239
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 14-2.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.239
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 21-2.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.248
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 15-2.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.229
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 24-2.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.252
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 16-2.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.234
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 1-1.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.178
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 2-1.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 17-2.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 3-1.74 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.231
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 22-2.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.251
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 4-1.84 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.232
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 5-2.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.225
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 18-2.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.242
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 6-2.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.229
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 7-2.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.237
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Week in Weekly Mean of the ADP Intensity ScoresWeek 19-2.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.243
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 12 for Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

The Patient Global Impression of Change is a scale that aims to evaluate all aspects of participants' (patients') health and determining if there has been an improvement or not. The participant selects the one response from the response options that gives the most accurate description of his/her state of health (overall status). This is a 7-point scale, and scores range from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). Lower scores indicate better health status.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 for Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)2.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 for Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)2.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 12 for WOMAC C (Function Subscale)

The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC®) Osteoarthritis Index is a questionnaire that measures pain, stiffness, and function both independently and collectively, using a Likert 3.1, 5- point scale. The Likert Scale uses the following descriptors for all items: none, mild moderate, severe, and extreme, corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FX006 32 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 for WOMAC C (Function Subscale)-0.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 for WOMAC C (Function Subscale)-0.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.087
Other Pre-specified

Percent of Responders According to Outcomes Measures in OMERACT-OARSI Strict Criteria

Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials - Osteoarthritis Research Society International. (OMERACT-OARSI) Responders are defined as participants with high improvement in pain or function.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: Percent of responders according to Outcomes Measures in OMERACT-OARSI strict criteria for patients assigned to FX006 16 mg arm was not a pre-specified Secondary Outcome and therefore not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
FX006 32 mgPercent of Responders According to Outcomes Measures in OMERACT-OARSI Strict CriteriaWeek 475 Participants
FX006 32 mgPercent of Responders According to Outcomes Measures in OMERACT-OARSI Strict CriteriaWeek 873 Participants
FX006 32 mgPercent of Responders According to Outcomes Measures in OMERACT-OARSI Strict CriteriaWeek 1270 Participants
PlaceboPercent of Responders According to Outcomes Measures in OMERACT-OARSI Strict CriteriaWeek 451 Participants
PlaceboPercent of Responders According to Outcomes Measures in OMERACT-OARSI Strict CriteriaWeek 858 Participants
PlaceboPercent of Responders According to Outcomes Measures in OMERACT-OARSI Strict CriteriaWeek 1257 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Proportion of Patients Experiencing a >20%, 30% and 50% Decrease in Pain From Baseline in Weekly Mean of the Average Daily (24-hr) Pain Intensity Scores at Week 12

The pain intensity score is measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates pain as bad as you can imagine.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Other Pre-specified

Time to Onset of Pain Relief

Time to onset of pain relief in days is defined as the time from administration of study treatment to the first pain assessment showing \>30% improvement from the weekly average daily pain score at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline up to 24 Weeks after administration of study treatment

Population: Time to onset of pain relief for patients assigned to FX006 16 mg arm was not a pre-specified Secondary Outcome and therefore not reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
FX006 32 mgTime to Onset of Pain Relief4 days
PlaceboTime to Onset of Pain Relief8 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026