Hepatitis C Virus Infection
Conditions
Keywords
Hepatitis C Virus Infection, Simeprevir, Sofosbuvir, HCV, Cirrhosis
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of 12 weeks of simeprevir (150 mg qd) in combination with sofosbuvir (400 mg qd) in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infected men and women with cirrhosis who are HCV treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced.
Detailed description
This is a open-label (all people know the identity of the intervention), single arm, multicenter study. The study will consist of a screening phase up to 4 weeks, open-label treatment phase of 12 weeks, and post-treatment follow up phase up to 24 weeks after end of treatment. Approximately 100 participants will receive 150 mg simeprevir in combination with 400 mg sofosbuvir once dailyfor 12 weeks. Safety evaluations will include assessment of adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, and physical examination. The maximum study duration for each participant will be approximately 40 weeks.
Interventions
100 participants will receive 1 capsule of 150 mg orally once daily for 12 weeks.
100 participants will receive 1 tablet of 400 mg sofosbuvir orally once daily for 12 weeks.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection (confirmed at screening). * HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) greater than 10,000 IU/mL at screening * Treatment-experienced participants must have at least 1 documented previous course of interferon-based regimen with or without ribavirin * Participants must have an hepatic imaging procedure (ultrasound, computerized tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging scan) within 6 months prior to the screening visit (or between screening and Day 1) with no findings suspicious for hepatocellular carcinoma * Participant must be willing and able to comply with the protocol requirements * Participants with liver cirrhosis
Exclusion criteria
* Evidence of clinical hepatic decompensation (history or current evidence of ascites, bleeding varices or hepatic encephalopathy) * Infection/co-infection with HCV non-genotype 1 * Co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 or type 2 (HIV-1 or HIV-2) (positive HIV-1 or HIV-2 antibodies test at screening) * Co-infection with hepatitis B virus (hepatitis B-surface-antigen positive) * Previously been treated with any direct acting anti-HCV agent (approved or investigational) for chronic HCV infection
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 12 Weeks After the Actual End of Treatment (EOT) | Week 24 | Participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than (\<) 25 international unit per milliliter (IU/mL) (detectable or undetectable) at 12 weeks after the actual end of treatment. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 24 Weeks After the Actual End of Treatment (EOT) | Week 36 | Participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than (\<) 25 international unit per milliliter (IU/mL) (detectable or undetectable) at 24 weeks after the actual end of treatment. |
| Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response | Week 2, 4 and End of Treatment (Week 12) | On-treatment virologic response was determined by HCV RNA results satisfying a specified threshold. \<LLOQ undetectable was considered as threshold at any time point. The LLOQ value is 25 IU/mL. EOT=End of Treatment. |
| Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Failure | Week 12 | On-treatment failure is defined as participants who do not achieve SVR12 and with confirmed detectable HCV RNA at the actual end of study drug treatment. |
| Percentage of Participants With Viral Breakthrough | Up to End of Treatment (Week 12) | Viral breakthrough was defined as confirmed greater than (\>) 1 log10 increase in HCV RNA from nadir or confirmed HCV RNA \>100 IU/mL in participants who had previously achieved HCV RNA \< LLOQ (25 IU/mL). |
| Percentage of Participants With Viral Relapse | During the Follow-up (Week 24) | Viral relapse was defined as participants who did not achieve SVR12 and had HCV RNA \< LLOQ (25 IU/mL) undetectable at EOT and had HCV RNA \>= LLOQ (25 IU/mL) during the follow-up period. |
| Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 4 Weeks After the Actual End of Treatment (EOT) | Week 16 | Participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than (\<) 25 international unit per milliliter (IU/mL) (detectable or undetectable) at 4 weeks after the actual end of treatment. |
| Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) up to Follow-up Week 24 | Baseline, Week 12, Follow-up Week 12 and 24 | The FSS was a self-administered questionnaire with 9 items developed to assess disabling fatigue that has been used extensively in studies of chronic HCV infection. Item responses were measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1 point) to strongly agree (7 points). The 9 items were averaged to produce a total score; a lower total score indicates less severe fatigue. FSS scores have a range from 1 to 7 where higher scores indicate more severe fatigue. |
| Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) | Baseline, Week 12, Follow-up Week 12 and 24 | The CES-D Scale assessed how often during the past week participants experienced 20 symptoms commonly associated with major depression. The CES-D scores range from 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (all 20 symptoms most or all of the time during the past 5 to 7 days). The CES-D scores between 16 and 23 points indicate mild to moderate depressive illness while CES-D scores \>=23 indicate probable major depressive illness. |
| Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) up to Follow-up Week 24 | Baseline, Follow-up Week 12 and 24 | The EQ-5D questionnaire was a brief, generic health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment that could also be used to incorporate participant preferences into health economic evaluations. The EQ-5D questionnaire assessed HRQOL in terms of degree of limitation on 5 health dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and as overall health using a thermometer visual analog scale with response options ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health). |
| Number of Participants Not Achieving SVR Showing Emerging Mutation at Time of Failure in HCV NS3/4A Sequence and NS5B up to Follow-up Week 24 | Baseline, Day 3, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, Follow-up Week 4, 12 and 24 | Sequencing of the HCV nonstructural protein 3/4A (NS3/4A) and nonstructural protein 5B (NS5B) genes was done to identify pre-existing sequence polymorphisms and characterize emerging HCV viral variants in participants not achieving SVR. Sequencing data is available for 16 participants. |
| Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Symptom and Impact Questionnaire Version 4 (HCV-SIQv4) Overall Body System Score (OBSS) up to Follow-up Week 12 | Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Follow-Up Week 12 | The HCV-SIQv4 OBSS was a self-administered questionnaire that contained 33 items: 29 questions developed to assess severity or frequency of symptoms associated with HCV or its treatment, 3 questions regarding the impact of symptoms on work/school attendance, and 1 question regarding the impact of symptoms on daily activities. A symptom severity score (the mean of responses to the 29 symptom items); each symptom score was transformed to have a range from 0 to 100 (most severe). Higher HCV SIQv4 scores indicates worse symptom severity, more time missed from work/school, and more impairment in daily activities, respectively. |
Countries
Canada, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
A total of 147 participants from the United States and Canada were Screened and 103 were enrolled into the study. All 103 participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and so were included in intent to treat (ITT) population.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks. | 103 |
| Total | 103 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 5 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 58 years |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 20 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 83 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 47 / 103 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 5 / 103 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 12 Weeks After the Actual End of Treatment (EOT)
Participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than (\<) 25 international unit per milliliter (IU/mL) (detectable or undetectable) at 12 weeks after the actual end of treatment.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 12 Weeks After the Actual End of Treatment (EOT) | 83.5 Percentage of Participants |
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) up to Follow-up Week 24
The EQ-5D questionnaire was a brief, generic health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment that could also be used to incorporate participant preferences into health economic evaluations. The EQ-5D questionnaire assessed HRQOL in terms of degree of limitation on 5 health dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and as overall health using a thermometer visual analog scale with response options ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).
Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up Week 12 and 24
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication. Here, N (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) up to Follow-up Week 24 | Baseline (n=96) | 70.1 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 2.17 |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) up to Follow-up Week 24 | Change at Follow-up Week 12 (n=92) | 9.8 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.9 |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) up to Follow-up Week 24 | Change at Follow-up Week 24 (n=86) | 9.5 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.75 |
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) up to Follow-up Week 24
The FSS was a self-administered questionnaire with 9 items developed to assess disabling fatigue that has been used extensively in studies of chronic HCV infection. Item responses were measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1 point) to strongly agree (7 points). The 9 items were averaged to produce a total score; a lower total score indicates less severe fatigue. FSS scores have a range from 1 to 7 where higher scores indicate more severe fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Follow-up Week 12 and 24
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication. Here, N (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) up to Follow-up Week 24 | Baseline (n=96) | 3.4 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.18 |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) up to Follow-up Week 24 | Change at Week 12 (n=86) | -0.4 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.18 |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) up to Follow-up Week 24 | Change at Follow-up Week 12 (n=92) | -0.6 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.16 |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) up to Follow-up Week 24 | Change at Follow-up Week 24 (n=86) | -0.8 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.18 |
Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Symptom and Impact Questionnaire Version 4 (HCV-SIQv4) Overall Body System Score (OBSS) up to Follow-up Week 12
The HCV-SIQv4 OBSS was a self-administered questionnaire that contained 33 items: 29 questions developed to assess severity or frequency of symptoms associated with HCV or its treatment, 3 questions regarding the impact of symptoms on work/school attendance, and 1 question regarding the impact of symptoms on daily activities. A symptom severity score (the mean of responses to the 29 symptom items); each symptom score was transformed to have a range from 0 to 100 (most severe). Higher HCV SIQv4 scores indicates worse symptom severity, more time missed from work/school, and more impairment in daily activities, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Follow-Up Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication. Here, N (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Symptom and Impact Questionnaire Version 4 (HCV-SIQv4) Overall Body System Score (OBSS) up to Follow-up Week 12 | Baseline (n=98) | 17.4 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.47 |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Symptom and Impact Questionnaire Version 4 (HCV-SIQv4) Overall Body System Score (OBSS) up to Follow-up Week 12 | Change at Week 4 (n=96) | -4.9 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.23 |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Symptom and Impact Questionnaire Version 4 (HCV-SIQv4) Overall Body System Score (OBSS) up to Follow-up Week 12 | Change at Week 12 (n=89) | -4.7 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.39 |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Symptom and Impact Questionnaire Version 4 (HCV-SIQv4) Overall Body System Score (OBSS) up to Follow-up Week 12 | Change at Follow-up Week 12 (n=94) | -5.8 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.36 |
Number of Participants Not Achieving SVR Showing Emerging Mutation at Time of Failure in HCV NS3/4A Sequence and NS5B up to Follow-up Week 24
Sequencing of the HCV nonstructural protein 3/4A (NS3/4A) and nonstructural protein 5B (NS5B) genes was done to identify pre-existing sequence polymorphisms and characterize emerging HCV viral variants in participants not achieving SVR. Sequencing data is available for 16 participants.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 3, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, Follow-up Week 4, 12 and 24
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication. Here, N (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Number of Participants Not Achieving SVR Showing Emerging Mutation at Time of Failure in HCV NS3/4A Sequence and NS5B up to Follow-up Week 24 | HCV NS3 | 13 Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Number of Participants Not Achieving SVR Showing Emerging Mutation at Time of Failure in HCV NS3/4A Sequence and NS5B up to Follow-up Week 24 | NS5B | 0 Participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 24 Weeks After the Actual End of Treatment (EOT)
Participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than (\<) 25 international unit per milliliter (IU/mL) (detectable or undetectable) at 24 weeks after the actual end of treatment.
Time frame: Week 36
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 24 Weeks After the Actual End of Treatment (EOT) | 82.5 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 4 Weeks After the Actual End of Treatment (EOT)
Participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than (\<) 25 international unit per milliliter (IU/mL) (detectable or undetectable) at 4 weeks after the actual end of treatment.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 4 Weeks After the Actual End of Treatment (EOT) | 86.4 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
The CES-D Scale assessed how often during the past week participants experienced 20 symptoms commonly associated with major depression. The CES-D scores range from 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (all 20 symptoms most or all of the time during the past 5 to 7 days). The CES-D scores between 16 and 23 points indicate mild to moderate depressive illness while CES-D scores \>=23 indicate probable major depressive illness.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Follow-up Week 12 and 24
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication. Here, N (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) | Baseline: No Depression (n=96) | 67.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) | Baseline: Mild to Moderate Depression (n=96) | 16.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) | Baseline: Severe Depression (n=96) | 15.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) | Week 12: No Depression (n=88) | 77.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) | Week 12: Mild to Moderate Depression (n=88) | 15.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) | Week 12: Severe Depression (n=88) | 6.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) | Follow-up Week 12: No Depression (n=94) | 79.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) | Follow-up Week12:Mild to Moderate Depression(n=94) | 6.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) | Follow-up Week 12: Severe Depression (n=94) | 13.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) | Follow-up Week 24: No Depression (n=88) | 79.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) | Follow-up Week24:Mild to Moderate Depression(n=88) | 10.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) | Follow-up Week 24: Severe Depression (n=88) | 10.2 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Failure
On-treatment failure is defined as participants who do not achieve SVR12 and with confirmed detectable HCV RNA at the actual end of study drug treatment.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Failure | 2.9 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response
On-treatment virologic response was determined by HCV RNA results satisfying a specified threshold. \<LLOQ undetectable was considered as threshold at any time point. The LLOQ value is 25 IU/mL. EOT=End of Treatment.
Time frame: Week 2, 4 and End of Treatment (Week 12)
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication. Here 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response | Week 2: < 25 IU/mL (n=102) | 68.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response | Week 2: < 100 IU/mL (n=102) | 90.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response | Week 2: < 25 IU/mL Detectable (n=102) | 44.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response | Week 2: < 25 IU/mL Undetectable (n=102) | 24.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response | Week 4: < 100 IU/mL (n=102) | 99.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response | Week 4: < 25 IU/mL (n=102) | 99.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response | Week 4: < 25 IU/mL Detectable (n=102) | 15.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response | Week 4: < 25 IU/mL Undetectable (n=102) | 83.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response | EOT (Week 12): < 100 IU/mL (n=103) | 97.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response | EOT (Week 12): < 25 IU/mL (n=103) | 97.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response | EOT (Week 12): < 25 IU/mL Detectable (n=103) | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response | EOT (Week 12): < 25 IU/mL Undetectable (n=103) | 97.1 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Viral Breakthrough
Viral breakthrough was defined as confirmed greater than (\>) 1 log10 increase in HCV RNA from nadir or confirmed HCV RNA \>100 IU/mL in participants who had previously achieved HCV RNA \< LLOQ (25 IU/mL).
Time frame: Up to End of Treatment (Week 12)
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With Viral Breakthrough | 1.9 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Viral Relapse
Viral relapse was defined as participants who did not achieve SVR12 and had HCV RNA \< LLOQ (25 IU/mL) undetectable at EOT and had HCV RNA \>= LLOQ (25 IU/mL) during the follow-up period.
Time frame: During the Follow-up (Week 24)
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication. Here N (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir | Percentage of Participants With Viral Relapse | 13.1 Percentage of Participants |