Skip to content

Comparative Efficacy Study of Titratable Versus Active Mandibular Advancement Splint in Sleep Apnea

Comparative Study of Efficacy of Titratable Mandibular Advancement Splint Versus Active Mandibular Advancement Splint to Treat Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02112435
Acronym
SOMNYX
Enrollment
100
Registered
2014-04-14
Start date
2014-08-31
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2024-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Keywords

obstructive sleep apnea, mandibular advancement splint, active mandibular advancement splint, oral appliance

Brief summary

Sleep apnea is a common disorder that occurs in 3-10 % of the adult population. This disorder disrupts the architecture and quality of sleep. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is the standard treatment, but in some cases, it can not be used (patient refusal or intolerance). In these cases, treatment with mandibular advancement devices can bring an improvement in symptoms. Therefore, this study aims to compare the effectiveness of titratable versus active mandibular advancement splints in standard care environment. This will be based on the global response, which includes the apnea-hypopnea index and compliance in severe apnea patients who refused or where intolerant to CPAP. Following their severe apnea diagnosis and the assessment on the feasibility of placing a mandibular advancement device, follow-up visits will be scheduled after 3 months of treatment involving clinical monitoring by a physician and a dentist.

Interventions

DEVICESomnyx ®

Active mandibular advancement splint

DEVICENarval ORM ® or SomnoDent ®

Mandibular advancement splint

Sponsors

Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Montpellier
CollaboratorOTHER
Université de Montréal
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age between 18 and 65 years * severe OSA confirmed by polysomnography (PSG) is: 30\> AHI\> 15 with severe daytime sleepiness - Epworth ≥ 10 or AHI\> 30 * patient in failure or refusal of CPAP treatment * agree to participate and sign the consent form research * speak and understand French without external assistance * be in good health (no neurological or psychiatric syndrome). * have a valid Social Security card (in France and Portugal only)

Exclusion criteria

* contra-indicated dental/periodontal states for mandibular advancement splints, such as: 1) significant edentulism (less than 3 healthy teeth / quadrant), 2) generalized periodontitis or severe parodonthopathies, 3) severe disorders of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), 4) less than 5 mm of maximal mandibular protrusion * dental restorations in progress or planned in the next 6 months * psychiatric and neuromuscular disorders * untreated cardiovascular diseases and history of stroke or myocardial infarction * severe or morbid obesity (body mass index\> 35)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall response ratefollowing 3 months of treatmentOverall response rate (ORR) = rate of complete response (TRc) + partial response rate (PRR) =% of patients with AHI \<15 or ≥ 50% reduction in AHI and compliance ≥ 5 nights / week and 5 hours / night

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Partial response rateFollowing 3 months of treatmentPartial response rate =% of patients with reduction AHI ≥ 50% with AHI\> 15 or AHI \<15 with reduction \<50% and adherence ≥ 5 nights / week and 5 hours / night) at 3 months of treatment.
Subjective complianceFollowing 3 months of treatmentSubjective compliance
Sleep qualityFollowing 3 months of treatmentsleep efficiency, total sleep time
DesaturationFollowing 3 months of treatmentdesaturation index, time spent below 90%
Rate of Complete Responsefollowing 3 months of treatmentRate of Complete Response (TRc) =% Patients with AHI \<15 and AHI ≥ 50% reduction and compliance ≥ 5 nights / week and 5 hours / night)
Quality of lifeFollowing 3 months of treatmentFunctional outcomes sleep questionnaire (FOSQ)
FatigueFollowing 3 months of treatmentChalder fatigue questionnaire
Subjective daytime sleepinessFollowing 3 months of treatmentEpworth sleepiness score
Side effectsFollowing 3 months of treatmentside effects and interactions with the dental evaluations
Subjective sleepFollowing 3 months of treatmentPittsburgh questionnaire

Countries

Canada, France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026