Skip to content

Group Versus Internet-based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Procrastination

Group Versus Internet-based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Procrastination

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02112383
Enrollment
90
Registered
2014-04-11
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2016-10-31
Last updated
2018-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Procrastination

Keywords

Procrastination, Cognitive behavior therapy, Internet interventions, Group intervention, Students, Randomized controlled trial

Brief summary

Procrastination is defined as a voluntarily delay of an intended course of action despite expecting to be worse-off for the delay, and is considered a persistent behavior pattern that can result in major psychological suffering. About one-fifth of the adult population and half of the student population are presumed having substantial difficulties due to recurrent procrastination in their everyday life. However, chronic and severe procrastinators seldom receive adequate care due to preconceptions and the lack of understanding regarding procrastination and the treatment interventions that are assumed beneficial. Cognitive behavior therapy is often deemed treatment of choice, although the evidence supporting its use is scarce, and only one randomized controlled trial has been performed. The primary aim of the current study is therefore to test the efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy delivered as either a group intervention or via the Internet. Participants will consist of students recruited through the Student Health Centre at Karolinska Institutet. A randomized controlled trial with a sample size of 100 participants divided into two conditions will be employed; a ten week Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy intervention, and an eight week group intervention based on cognitive behavior therapy. The current study is believed to result in two important findings. First, different interventions inherent in cognitive behavior therapy are assumed to be helpful for people suffering from problems caused by procrastination. Second, both a group intervention and an Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy intervention are presumed suitable for administering treatment for procrastination, which is considered highly important as the availability of adequate care is limited, particularly among students. The current study will increase the knowledge regarding the efficacy of different treatments of procrastination, as well as enhance the overall comprehension of the difficulties related to dilatory behavior.

Interventions

For participants in the group intervention condition, the modules from a self-help treatment for procrastination will be delivered at four consecutive three-hour sessions at the Student Health Centre at Karolinska Institutet, with approximately two modules given at each session. The sessions will be spaced two weeks apart, during which participants are instructed to complete assignments related to the modules that were in focus of the previous session, e.g., goal-setting, time management, and behavioral experiments, which they are advised to present and discuss with the other participants.

For participants in the Internet-based condition, the modules from a self-help treatment for procrastination will be distributed weekly during the treatment period, with one module given each week, i.e., ten weeks. In comparison to the group condition, participants will not receive a therapist contact or attend any sessions. In addition, the participants are expected to complete both the reading material and the assignments that are included in each module.

Sponsors

Karolinska Institutet
CollaboratorOTHER
Stockholm University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Fluent in Swedish * Computer with Internet access and a working email * Registered as students at one of the affiliated universities of the Student Health Centre at Karolinska Institutet * Primary difficulties related to chronic and severe procrastination

Exclusion criteria

* Severe depression (30 points or more on MADRS-S) * Acute conditions in need of treatment; suicidal ideation, neuropsychiatric conditions (ADHD, ADD), misuse of alcohol or drugs, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and psychosis * Ongoing psychotherapy * Ongoing psychotropic medication (unless dose is stable three months prior the entering treatment)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline on the Pure Procrastination Scale (PPS)0 weeks and 8 or 10 weeksThe PPS features twelve items measuring the prevalence of procrastination.
Change from baseline on the Procrastination Assessment Scale for Students (PASS)0 weeks and 8 or 10 weeksThe PASS features three items measuring difficulties of procrastination within six different domains of study related activities.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-S)0 weeks and 8 or 10 weeksThe MADRS-S is a self-report version of MADRS and features nine items measuring changes in mood, anxiety, sleeping patterns, appetite, concentration, initiative, emotional engagement, pessimism and attitude towards life.
Change from baseline on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7)0 weeks and 8 or 10 weeksThe GAD-7 features seven items for assessing anxiety and screening for generalized anxiety disorder.
Change in baseline on the Symptoms Checklist 90 (SCL-90)0 weeks and 8 or 10 weeksSCL-90 features 90 items evaluating the participant's physical health and mental well-being, and consists of three global domains as well as nine subdomains.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Open-ended questions concerning adverse events4/5 weeks, 8/10 weeks, six-month follow-upThe occurrence and characteristics of possible negative effects of treatment will be examined using open-ended questions, i.e., did you experience any negative effects during treatment, including rating scales assessing the degree to which the adverse event has affected the participant.

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026