Skip to content

Simultaneaous Detection of Quantitative Somatic Alterations Using the Qantitative Multiplex Pcr of Short Fluorescent Fragments Method (QMPSF) in Stage II-III Colon Cancer: a Prospective Study

Simultaneous Detection of Somatic Quantitative Molecular Alterations Using the Qantitative Multiplex Pcr of Short Fluorescent Fragments Method (QMPSF) in Stage II-III Colon Cancer: a Prospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02110329
Acronym
Code Barre
Enrollment
401
Registered
2014-04-10
Start date
2010-05-01
Completion date
2013-11-01
Last updated
2026-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer, Stage II and III

Keywords

colorectal cancer, stage II and III, somatic quantitative molecular alterations, Qantitative Multiplex Pcr of Short fluorescent Fragments method (QMPSF)

Brief summary

Lymph node involvement remains the main criteria for postoperative chemotherapy in patients with colon cancer (CC) without distant metastasis. To date, the prognostic value of the somatic quantitative molecular alterations such as loss or gain of genomic region is not established in CC. AIMS & METHODS: Using the one-step screening method based on the Quantitative Multiplex PCR of Short fluorescent Fragments (QMPSF), we aimed to assess the prognostic role of the simultaneous detection of main quantitative somatic alterations in stage II-III CC. Patients and Methods. We enrolled and collected all baseline characteristics of patients operated for a stage II-III CC with storage frozen tissues. The QMPSF was based on a simultaneous amplification of 9 selected target genomic sequences from literature: DCC (18q21); EGFR (7p12); P53 (17p13.1); BLK (8p23-p22); c-myc (8q24.12); APC (5q22.2); ERBB2 (17q12); STK6 (20q13.31); NR21 (14p11.1) and two control: DCOHM (5q31.1); HMBS (11q23.3). Comparison of each amplicon electropherograms obtained from tumour vs normal peritumoral tissue allowed us to identified gain or loss genomic region. The primary end-point was the local and/or distant recurrence and relation between clinical and single or combined molecular alterations and recurrence were evaluated.

Interventions

GENETICevaluation of the recurrence rate according to molecular analysis

Sponsors

University Hospital, Rouen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age over 18 * localized colon cancer * proven adenocarcinoma * surgery R0 * no metastatic disease * stage II or III * WHO performance status 0, 1 or 2 * availaible frozen tissue * written consent * no major co-morbidities

Exclusion criteria

* metastatic disease * hereditary colorectal cancer * rectal cancer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurence rate according to molecular results36 monthsUsing the one-step screening method based on the Quantitative Multiplex PCR of Short fluorescent Fragments (QMPSF), we aimed to assess the prognostic role of the simultaneous detection of main quantitative somatic alterations in stage II-III CC.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival rate according to molecular results60 monthsUsing the one-step screening method based on the Quantitative Multiplex PCR of Short fluorescent Fragments (QMPSF), we aimed to assess the prognostic role of the simultaneous detection of main quantitative somatic alterations in stage II-III CC.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 17, 2026