Skip to content

Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation

A Prospective, Comparative Study to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Dynamic Stabilization in Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02110186
Acronym
LIDH
Enrollment
195
Registered
2014-04-10
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2019-06-30
Last updated
2014-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar Disc Herniation

Keywords

lumbar disc herniation, dynamic stabilization, discectomy with posterior dynamic stabilization, discectomy alone, discectomy with internal fixation and fusion

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare safety and outcomes of the following treatments of lumbar disc herniation: (1) discectomy with posterior dynamic stabilization with those of (2) discectomy alone or (3) discectomy with internal fixation and fusion. Discectomy with posterior dynamic stabilization is proposed as the most effective treatment to improve range of motion, and to be similarly effective to discectomy alone and discectomy with internal fixation and fusion for other functional outcomes after surgery.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of (1) discectomy with posterior dynamic stabilization with those of (2) discectomy alone or (3) discectomy with internal fixation and fusion. Study aims are: 1. To demonstrate superiority of discectomy with posterior dynamic stabilization over discectomy alone and discectomy with internal fixation and fusion in range of motion at the operated level; 2. To demonstrate non-inferiority of discectomy with posterior dynamic stabilization compared to discectomy alone and discectomy with internal fixation and fusion in functional outcomes as measured by change in Oswestry Disability Index; 3. To compare radiological, clinical, patient-reported and safety outcomes among the three surgical approaches.

Interventions

DEVICEDynamic Stabilization
PROCEDUREDiscectomy

Sponsors

Third Military Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed informed consent * Age between 20 and 60 years inclusive * Radiographic evidence of single level lumbar disc herniation * Scheduled for single-level lumbar discectomy with or without fusion or dynamic stabilization * Preoperative ODI ≥ 30 * Clinical symptoms consistent with lumbar disc herniation determined by history or physical exam: * Radicular back or lower extremity pain and/or * Decreased muscular strength and/or * Abnormal sensation * Involved disk at the spinal level between L2 and S1 * Failed to gain adequate symptom relief from at least one month of adequate non-operative treatment, except in patients with severe symptoms that require immediate surgery (at surgeon's discretion) * Absence of significant symptomatic adjacent segment disk herniation

Exclusion criteria

* Cauda equine syndrome * Previous spinal surgery, except previous discectomy at the same segment * Patients with other lumbar conditions that will, in the opinion of the investigator, interfere with clinical outcomes (e.g. spinal structural deformities, spinal fractures, ankylosing spondylitis, spinal tuberculosis, spinal infection, spinal tumors, symptomatic cervical spinal disease) * Osteoporosis defined as T-score ≤ -2.5. BMD will be measured by DEXA performed on lumbar spine * Systemic infection such as AIDS, HIV, and active hepatitis * Recent history (less than 3 years) of chemical substance dependency or significant psychosocial disturbance, which may impact the outcome or study participation * Participation in a clinical trial of another investigational drug or device within the past 30 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Range of motion in sagittal plane at the operated level24 months
Mean Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)Baseline, 24 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in Lumbar Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)Baseline, 24 months
Change in Leg Pain NRSBaseline, 24 months

Other

MeasureTime frame
Change in SF-36 dimensionsBaseline, 24 Months
Time to occurrence and relationship to surgery of adverse eventsup to 24 months
Radiographic Evaluations24 months

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026