Skip to content

Effect of Ticagrelor on Fractional Flow Reserve

Differential Effect of Ticagrelor vs Prasugrel or Clopidogrel Loading on Fractional Flow Reserve

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02108808
Enrollment
76
Registered
2014-04-09
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2015-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fractional Flow Reserve

Keywords

FFR, adenosine, Ticagrelor

Brief summary

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an established invasive method for assessing the physiological significance of coronary artery stenosis. Adenosine, an important endogenous regulator of coronary blood flow during both stress and ischemia, is widely used to achieve conditions of stable hyperemia required for measurement of FFR. Studies in healthy volunteers and in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) receiving ticagrelor revealed a differential coronary blood flow velocity response during increasing doses of adenosine compared to placebo or prasugrel treated subjects, respectively. It has also been demonstrated that patients treated with ticagrelor have increased plasma adenosine levels. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that the degree of hyperemia obtained with adenosine infusion may be greater in patients on ticagrelor than that obtained in patients taking clopidogrel or prasugrel. If this proves to be true, it would lead to a lower FFR value with possible important clinical implications in ticagrelor receiving patients in need for FFR measurement. This is a prospective, single center, randomized study of parallel design. Consecutive ticagrelor naive patients who are referred for coronary angiography and have an angiographically moderate to severe de novo stenosis (\>50% and \<90% diameter by visual assessment) in at least one major epicardial coronary artery amenable to PCI are candidates for this study. Patients after informed consent will be randomized (hour 0) to receive immediately post FFR (with adenosine iintravenous infusion at 140 μg/Kg/min for a 3 minute period) either ticagrelor 180mg loading dose or prasugrel 60mg/clopidogrel 600mg loading dose (as clinically indicated). FFR examination will be repeated 2 hours post loading dose.

Interventions

DRUGTicagrelor
DRUGPrasugrel or Clopidogrel

Sponsors

University of Patras
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18-80 years 2. Patients subjected to clinically indicated coronary angiography with at least one 50%-90% stenosis at 1 major epicardial vessel (by visual assessment) amenable to percutaneous coronary intervention. 3. Ticagrelor naive patients 4. Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. History of coronary artery bypass surgery 2. Acute myocardial infarction within the previous 5 days 3. Known allergy to adenosine, ticagrelor, prasugrel or clopidogrel 4. Prior intracranial hemorrhage 5. Hemodialysis or creatinine clearance \< 30ml/h 6. Moderate/severe hepatic failure 7. Active bleeding, or at increased risk of bleeding 8. Left ventricular ejection fraction \<40% 9. Primary myocardial or valvular disease 10. Contraindication to adenosine 11. Angiographically visible thrombus at a target lesion, extremely tortuous coronary arteries, severely calcified lesions, left main disease, anatomy suitable for coronary artery bypass surgery 12. Previous q wave myocardial infarction in the area of target vessel 13. Severe left ventricular hypertrophy 14. Severe valvular heart disease 15. Heart failure as defined by New York Heart Association class III or IV 16.Hypotension (blood pressure \<90 mm Hg) 17.Significant arrhythmia (e.g. excessive premature ventricular contractions or atrial fibrillation), tachycardia (heart rate \>120 beats/min), bradycardia (\<50 beats/min), increased risk for bradycardia 18.Caffeine consumption or cigarette smoking within the previous 24 hours.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
% relative change in steady hyperemia FFR (sFFR)2 hoursSteady hyperemia FFR (sFFR) is defined as the FFR value attained during stable hyperemia (as assessed by offline visual inspection of the 3-min hemodynamic trace) (sFFR post drug - sFFR pre drug)\*100/sFFR pre drug between the 2 treatment arms

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
% relative change in peak hyperemia FFR (pFFR)2 hoursPeak hyperemia FFR is defined as the lowest FFR measurement during the first 60 sec of adenosine infusion (pFFR post drug - pFFR pre drug)\*100/pFFR pre drug between the 2 treatment arms
% relative change in lowest FFR (lFFR)2 hoursLowest FFR (lFFR) is defined as the value provided by the automated FFR console (lFFR post drug - lFFR pre drug)\*100/lFFR pre drug between the 2 treatment arms
% relative change in time to lowest FFR2 hours(time to lFFR post drug - time to lFFR pre drug)\*100/time to lFFR pre drug between the 2 treatment arms
% relative change in area under the curve (AUC) of the FFR trace2 hours(AUC FFR post drug - AUC FFR pre drug)\*100/AUC FFR pre drug between the 2 treatment arms
% relative change in time to peak FFR (in seconds)2 hours(time to pFFR post drug - time to pFFR pre drug)\*100/time to pFFR pre drug between the 2 treatment arms

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reclassification of coronary revascularization strategy at hour 2 in relation to hour 02 hoursNumber of patients who were reclassified regarding revascularization strategy at hour 2 in relation to hour 0, between the 2 treatment arms

Countries

Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026