Telemedicine
Conditions
Keywords
Telemedicine, appendicitis, remote consultation
Brief summary
1. Purpose \- The investigators aim to evaluate the feasibility of iPhone based remote control system as a real-time remote CT reading tool for suspected appendicitis under 3G network and the suboptimal illumination. 2. Methods * A total of 120 abdominal CT examinations; sixty had no findings of appendicitis, while the other sixty showed signs of acute appendicitis, were selected. The 16 raters reviewed these images using an LCD monitor of the PACS workstation and also an iPhone which was connected to the PACS workstation via remote control system, grading the probability of presence of acute appendicitis on each examination by a five Likert scale. * The investigators will compare the diagnostic performance between two devices.
Detailed description
The 16 raters were randomly divided into two groups * The raters in group one reviewed the CT examinations numbered from one to 60 using LCD monitor and reviewed the remaining CT examinations numbered from 61 to 120 using iPhone with TeamViewer at their first visit * The other group firstly reviewed the CT scans numbered from one to 60 using iPhone with TeamViewer and 61 to 120 with the LCD monitor. * They visited twice with an interval of four weeks and reviewed the CT scans using revered devices at each session. * The raters were instructed to rate the likelihood of the presence or absence of appendicitis in each case using a five-Likert scale (1 = obvious no appendicitis, 2 = unlikely appendicitis, 3 = unsure, 4 = likely appendicitis, 5 = obvious appendicitis).
Interventions
DEVICERemote CT reading using the iPhone
DEVICECT reading using LCD monitor
Sponsors
Hanyang University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
33 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Board certified emergency physicians with a clinical experience of 5 years and over.
Exclusion criteria
* Corrected eyesight \< 20/30 * Color weakness or blindness
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic performance between iPhone and LCD monitor | within one day | * Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method with RSCORE and semi-parametric estimation of ROC indices by using the DMB-MRMC software (version 2.3, available at http://perception.radiology.uiowa.edu) * 95% confidence interval * The reviewers and cases are taken as random factors |
| Diagnostic accuracy between the iPhone and the LCD monitor | within one day | ◆ Sensitivity, specificity * gold standard: The pathology report and the results of clinical follow up * grade 1, 2 and 3 = negative appendicitis findings * grade 4 and 5 = positive appendicitis findings * McNemar's test to compare the sensitivity and specificity between the iPhad and the LCD monitor |
Countries
South Korea
Outcome results
None listed