Prostate Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
urinary diversion, urethral catheter, suprapubic tube, radical prostatectomy, robotic surgery, discomfort, pain
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to determine, whether the urinary diversion via suprapubic cystostomy compared to transurethral catheterization after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy superior the postoperative patient comfort and reduce the postoperative bacteriuria.
Interventions
suprapubic tube removal was allowed when the anastomosis was watertight, Day 5
transurethral catheter withdrawal was allowed when the anastomosis was watertight, Day 5
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Minimum age of 18 Years 2. Voluntarily agreement to participate in this study 3. Written informed-consent 4. Release of medical records for regulatory or research purposes 5. Clinically organ-confined prostate cancer
Exclusion criteria
1. BMI \>40 2. History of catheterization 3. History of radiation 4. History of chemotherapy 5. Person's participating in any other research 6. Unable to provide informed consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change of postoperative pain related to urinary drainage objectified by numeric rating scale (NRS) questionnaire within 5 days | postoperatively on day 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 in the morning, at noon and in the evening | To analyse the development of the postoperative pain related to urinary drainage patients completed NRS questionnaire three times a day: in the morning, at noon and in the evening until discharge of the catheter (regular 5 days after the surgery) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients with bacteriuria | 5th day after the surgery | Second void urine sample after catheter removal |
Countries
Germany