Skip to content

12-Week Efficacy and Safety Study of Ibodutant in Women With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea (IBS-D)

A 12-Week Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Phase III Study, Followed by a 4-Week Randomised Withdrawal Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Ibodutant 10 mg Once Daily in Female Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02107196
Acronym
IRIS-3
Enrollment
535
Registered
2014-04-08
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2017-01-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea

Keywords

Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Colon, irritable, Bowel disease, Diarrhea

Brief summary

Irritable Bowel Syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder characterised by chronic or recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort and diarrhoea. This trial aims at the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of oral ibodutant 10 mg once daily as compared to placebo in women with IBS-D over a 12-week treatment period.

Detailed description

The study evaluates the efficacy and safety of ibodutant 10 mg, given once daily for 12 weeks in comparison with placebo in female IBS-D patients. Randomisation to ibodutant and placebo will be 1:1. Efficacy is evaluated in terms of weekly response for abdominal pain intensity and stool consistency over 12 weeks of treatment in at least 50% of the weeks of treatment. The clinical phase of the study comprises up to 2 weeks of screening for patient's eligibility, a 2-week run-in period (treatment-free) for IBS severity assessment, a 12-week double-blind treatment period, a 4-week randomised withdrawal (RW) period and a 2-week safety follow-up, resulting in a maximum 22-week overall duration of the study for each patient. Patients report their IBS-related symptoms daily in a telephone-based electronic diary from run-in until end of treatment.

Interventions

Oral tablet, to be given once daily.

DRUGPlacebo

Oral tablet, (identical in appearance and weight to ibodutant tablets), to be given once daily.

Sponsors

Menarini Group
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

At screening: * Female patients aged 18 years or older. * Clinical diagnosis of IBS-D according to the following symptoms-based criteria as per Rome III modular questionnaire criteria: 1. Recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort for at least 3 days per month in the last 3 months associated with at least 2 of the following characteristics: a) improvement with defecation; b) onset associated with a change in the frequency of stool; c) onset associated with a change in form (appearance) of stool. 2. Symptom-onset at least 6 months prior to diagnosis. 3. Loose or watery stools at least 25% of the time in the last 3 months AND hard or lumpy stools less than 25% of the time in the last 3 months. 4. Additional criterion: more than 3 bowel movements per day at least 25% of the time in the last 3 months. * For patients older than 50 years OR patients with a positive family history of colorectal cancer: normal results from colonoscopy/flexible sigmoidoscopy performed within the last 5 years. * For patients aged 65 years or older: absence of ischaemic colitis, microscopy colitis or any other organic gastrointestinal disease as evidenced by the results of a colonoscopy/flexible sigmoidoscopy with biopsy performed within 6 months. * For women of childbearing potential: Use of a highly effective contraceptive method with a failure rate \<1% per year throughout the entire study period. * Physical examination without clinically relevant abnormalities during screening. * No clinically relevant abnormalities in 12-Lead ECG or in laboratory findings. * Mentally competent, able to give written informed consent, and compliant to undergo all visits and procedures. * Unrestricted access to a touch-tone telephone. * Willingness to refrain from using loperamide within 3 days prior to run-in visit and during the run-in period. Additional criteria at randomisation: * During both weeks of the run-in period: 1. A weekly average of worst abdominal pain in the past 24 hours with a score of ≥3.0 on a 0 to 10 point scale. 2. At least one bowel movement on each day. 3. A weekly average of at least 3 bowel movements per day. 4. At least one stool with a consistency of Type 6 or Type 7 according to the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) on at least 2 days per week. 5. Less than 2 bowel movements with a consistency of Type 1 or Type 2 according to the BSS per week. * Adequate compliance with the e-diary recording procedure defined as at least 11 of 14 days (≥75%) of the nominal daily data entry.

Exclusion criteria

* Male gender. * Diagnosis of IBS with a subtype of constipation, mixed IBS, or un-subtyped IBS. * Colonic or major abdominal surgery, any other major abdominal surgery or elective major surgery planned or expected during the study. * History of organic GI abnormalities, inflammatory bowel diseases, complicated diverticulosis, ischaemic colitis, microscopic colitis. * History of pancreatitis, active biliary duct disease, cholecystitis or symptomatic gallbladder stone disease in the previous 6 months. * History of gluten enteropathy or lactose intolerance. * Current or previous diagnosis of neoplasia. * History of endometriosis. * History of positive tests for ova or parasites, or clostridium difficile toxin or occult blood in the stool in the previous 6 months. * History of human immunodeficiency virus infection. * History of major cardiovascular events in the previous 6 months. * Uncontrolled hypertension, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus or abnormal thyroid function. * Major psychiatric or neurological disorders or unstable medical condition which may compromise the efficacy and safety assessments. * Evidence of clinically significant hepatic disease, severe renal insufficiency or anemia. * Relevant changes in dietary habits, lifestyle, or exercise regimen in the previous 2 months. * Use of prohibited concurrent medication within the previous month such as antibiotics, antimuscarinic drugs, drugs enhancing GI motility and analgesics. * Pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Inability to understand or collaborate throughout the study. * Participation in other clinical studies in the previous 4 weeks or concurrent enrollment in a clinical study. * Any condition that would compromise the well-being of the patient.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Weekly Response for Abdominal Pain Intensity AND Stool Consistency Over 12 Weeks of Treatment in at Least 50% of the Weeks of Treatment (6 Out of 12 Weeks).12 weeksThe patient will be considered a weekly responder if she meets both of the following criteria in the same week: * Abdominal pain response: decrease in weekly average of worst abdominal pain score in the past 24 hours of at least 30% compared with baseline; * Stool consistency response: decrease of at least 50% in the number of days per week with at least one stool that has a consistency of Type 6 or 7 compared with baseline. The patients reported Bristol Stoll Chart score based on a 1 to 7 scale where 1 corresponds to hard stool and 7 corresponds to watery diarrhoea.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Weekly Response for Abdominal Pain Intensity Over 12 Weeks of Treatment in at Least 50% of the Weeks of Treatment (6 Out of 12 Weeks).12 weeksThe patient will be considered a weekly abdominal pain responder if she meets the following criterion: * Decrease in weekly average of worst abdominal pain score in the past 24 hours of at least 30% compared with baseline.
Weekly Response for Stool Consistency Over 12 Weeks of Treatment in at Least 50% of the Weeks of Treatment (6 Out of 12 Weeks).12 weeksThe patient will be considered a weekly stool consistency responder if she meets the following criterion: * Decrease of at least 50% in the number of days per week with at least one stool that has a consistency of Type 6 or 7 compared with baseline. The patients reported Bristol Stool Chart score based on a 1 to 7 scale where 1 corresponds to hard stool and 7 corresponds to watery diarrhoea.
Weekly Response for Relief of Overall IBS Signs and Symptoms Over 12 Weeks of Treatment in at Least 50% of the Weeks of Treatment (6 Out of 12 Weeks).12 weeksThe patient will be considered a weekly responder if she has an IBS degree-of-relief equal to completely relieved/improved or considerably relieved/improved.
Evaluation of Rebound Effects4 weeksComparison between average abdominal pain intensity (worst abdominal pain on a 0 to 10 NRS scale, where 0 corresponds to no pain and 10 corresponds to worst possible pain) and average stool consistency score (the patients reported Bristol Stool Chart score based on a 1 to 7 NRS scale where 1 corresponds to hard stool and 7 corresponds to watery diarrhoea) during the 4-week RW presented as change to baseline. The analysis only included the patients randomised to ibodutant in the 12-week treatment period and re-randomised to placebo for the 4-week RW period. Baseline was considered as the average abdominal pain intensity/stool consistency in the 2-week Run-in period.

Countries

Bulgaria, Czechia, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Romania, Russia, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The first patient was screened on 27th February 2014 and the first patient randomized on 21st March 2014. The last patient completed the study on 22nd June 2015. The study was conducted at 158 clinical sites in 11 countries (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Romania, Russia, Spain, the USA and the United Kingdom).

Pre-assignment details

A total of 1237 patients entered a 2-week Screening period, 1034 entered the qualifying 2-week Run-in period and 535 of them were randomised. After completion of the double-blind 12-week treatment, 453 patients entered into the Randomised Withdrawal (RW) period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ibodutant 10 mg
Oral tablet to be given once daily for 12 weeks of treatment. Patients randomised to the ibodutant 10 mg arm will be re-randomised at week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to either ibodutant 10 mg or placebo for additional 4 weeks of treatment. Ibodutant 10 mg: Oral tablet, to be given once daily.
271
Placebo
Oral tablet to be given once daily for 12 weeks of treatment. Patients randomised to the placebo arm will be mock-re-randomised (switch in blinded conditions) to ibodutant at week 13 for additional 4 weeks of treatment. Placebo: Oral tablet, (identical in appearance and weight to ibodutant tablets), to be given once daily.
264
Total535

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
12-week Treatment PeriodAdverse Event63
12-week Treatment PeriodLack of Efficacy21
12-week Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up36
12-week Treatment PeriodPhysician Decision01
12-week Treatment PeriodProtocol Violation78
12-week Treatment PeriodReason Missing118
12-week Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject1512
4-week Randomized Withdrawal (RW) PeriodAdverse Event20
4-week Randomized Withdrawal (RW) PeriodProtocol Violation20
4-week Randomized Withdrawal (RW) PeriodReason Missing185
4-week Randomized Withdrawal (RW) PeriodWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboIbodutant 10 mg
Abdominal Pain Severity Score
<5
83 participants37 participants46 participants
Abdominal Pain Severity Score
>=5 to <8
363 participants187 participants176 participants
Abdominal Pain Severity Score
>=8
89 participants40 participants49 participants
Age, Continuous43.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.65
43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.47
42.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.81
Gender
Female
535 Participants264 Participants271 Participants
Gender
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
IBS-SSS Score
Mild IBS (<175)
8 participants6 participants2 participants
IBS-SSS Score
Missing
3 participants2 participants1 participants
IBS-SSS Score
Moderate IBS (175 to <300)
79 participants44 participants35 participants
IBS-SSS Score
Severe IBS (>=300)
445 participants212 participants233 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
285 participants136 participants149 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
250 participants128 participants122 participants
Region of Enrollment
Europe
135 participants66 participants69 participants
Region of Enrollment
North America
400 participants198 participants202 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
35 / 27133 / 264
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2712 / 264

Outcome results

Primary

Weekly Response for Abdominal Pain Intensity AND Stool Consistency Over 12 Weeks of Treatment in at Least 50% of the Weeks of Treatment (6 Out of 12 Weeks).

The patient will be considered a weekly responder if she meets both of the following criteria in the same week: * Abdominal pain response: decrease in weekly average of worst abdominal pain score in the past 24 hours of at least 30% compared with baseline; * Stool consistency response: decrease of at least 50% in the number of days per week with at least one stool that has a consistency of Type 6 or 7 compared with baseline. The patients reported Bristol Stoll Chart score based on a 1 to 7 scale where 1 corresponds to hard stool and 7 corresponds to watery diarrhoea.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The primary efficacy analysis was performed on the modified ITT population (n=437): all patients included in the ITT population excluding patients from one site, where a potential serious breach of GCP was reported, and from another site, where disqualification proceedings against the Investigator were confirmed by the FDA.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ibodutant 10 mgWeekly Response for Abdominal Pain Intensity AND Stool Consistency Over 12 Weeks of Treatment in at Least 50% of the Weeks of Treatment (6 Out of 12 Weeks).35.7 Percentage of Responders
PlaceboWeekly Response for Abdominal Pain Intensity AND Stool Consistency Over 12 Weeks of Treatment in at Least 50% of the Weeks of Treatment (6 Out of 12 Weeks).34.7 Percentage of Responders
Secondary

Evaluation of Rebound Effects

Comparison between average abdominal pain intensity (worst abdominal pain on a 0 to 10 NRS scale, where 0 corresponds to no pain and 10 corresponds to worst possible pain) and average stool consistency score (the patients reported Bristol Stool Chart score based on a 1 to 7 NRS scale where 1 corresponds to hard stool and 7 corresponds to watery diarrhoea) during the 4-week RW presented as change to baseline. The analysis only included the patients randomised to ibodutant in the 12-week treatment period and re-randomised to placebo for the 4-week RW period. Baseline was considered as the average abdominal pain intensity/stool consistency in the 2-week Run-in period.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: modified RW population: only patients randomised to ibodutant in the 12-week treatment period and re-randomized to placebo for the 4-week RW period (excluding patients from one site, where a potential serious breach of GCP was reported, and another site, where disqualification proceedings against the Investigator were confirmed by FDA).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ibodutant 10 mgEvaluation of Rebound Effects4-week RW-Bristol Stool Scale (NRS, 1 - 7 points)-1.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
Ibodutant 10 mgEvaluation of Rebound EffectsBaseline-Abdominal Pain Score (NRS, 0-10 points)6.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Ibodutant 10 mgEvaluation of Rebound Effects4-week RW-Abdominal Pain Score (NRS, 0-10 points)-3.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
Ibodutant 10 mgEvaluation of Rebound EffectsBaseline-Bristol Stool Scale (NRS, 1 - 7 points)6.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Secondary

Weekly Response for Abdominal Pain Intensity Over 12 Weeks of Treatment in at Least 50% of the Weeks of Treatment (6 Out of 12 Weeks).

The patient will be considered a weekly abdominal pain responder if she meets the following criterion: * Decrease in weekly average of worst abdominal pain score in the past 24 hours of at least 30% compared with baseline.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The secondary efficacy analysis was performed on the modified ITT population (n=437): all patients included in the ITT population excluding patients from one site, where a potential serious breach of GCP was reported, and from another site, where disqualification proceedings against the Investigator were confirmed by the FDA.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ibodutant 10 mgWeekly Response for Abdominal Pain Intensity Over 12 Weeks of Treatment in at Least 50% of the Weeks of Treatment (6 Out of 12 Weeks).48.0 percentage of responders
PlaceboWeekly Response for Abdominal Pain Intensity Over 12 Weeks of Treatment in at Least 50% of the Weeks of Treatment (6 Out of 12 Weeks).47.7 percentage of responders
Secondary

Weekly Response for Relief of Overall IBS Signs and Symptoms Over 12 Weeks of Treatment in at Least 50% of the Weeks of Treatment (6 Out of 12 Weeks).

The patient will be considered a weekly responder if she has an IBS degree-of-relief equal to completely relieved/improved or considerably relieved/improved.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The secondary efficacy analysis was performed on the modified ITT population (n=437): all patients included in the ITT population excluding patients from one site, where a potential serious breach of GCP was reported, and from another site, where disqualification proceedings against the Investigator were confirmed by the FDA.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ibodutant 10 mgWeekly Response for Relief of Overall IBS Signs and Symptoms Over 12 Weeks of Treatment in at Least 50% of the Weeks of Treatment (6 Out of 12 Weeks).21.3 percentage of responders
PlaceboWeekly Response for Relief of Overall IBS Signs and Symptoms Over 12 Weeks of Treatment in at Least 50% of the Weeks of Treatment (6 Out of 12 Weeks).19.0 percentage of responders
Secondary

Weekly Response for Stool Consistency Over 12 Weeks of Treatment in at Least 50% of the Weeks of Treatment (6 Out of 12 Weeks).

The patient will be considered a weekly stool consistency responder if she meets the following criterion: * Decrease of at least 50% in the number of days per week with at least one stool that has a consistency of Type 6 or 7 compared with baseline. The patients reported Bristol Stool Chart score based on a 1 to 7 scale where 1 corresponds to hard stool and 7 corresponds to watery diarrhoea.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The secondary efficacy analysis was performed on the modified ITT population (n=437): all patients included in the ITT population excluding patients from one site, where a potential serious breach of GCP was reported, and from another site, where disqualification proceedings against the Investigator were confirmed by the FDA.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ibodutant 10 mgWeekly Response for Stool Consistency Over 12 Weeks of Treatment in at Least 50% of the Weeks of Treatment (6 Out of 12 Weeks).44.8 percentage of responders
PlaceboWeekly Response for Stool Consistency Over 12 Weeks of Treatment in at Least 50% of the Weeks of Treatment (6 Out of 12 Weeks).43.1 percentage of responders

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026