Skip to content

Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Dry Eye in Contact Lens Wearers

Pilot Study for Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Evaporative Dry Eye in Contact Lens Wearers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02102464
Enrollment
55
Registered
2014-04-03
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2017-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Brief summary

The pilot study objective is to evaluate the potential benefits of LipiFlow® System treatment of contact lens wearers with meibomian gland dysfunction and evaporative dry eye by assessing for improvement in meibomian gland function and reduction of dry eye symptoms in comparison to an untreated control.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, non-significant risk, open-label, randomized clinical trial of LipiFlow® treatment of contact lens wearers with meibomian gland dysfunction and evaporative dry eye. All subjects undergo examination to determine study eligibility and to capture the Baseline status. Subjects are randomized to receive LipiFlow® treatment (Treatment Group) or no LipiFlow® treatment (Untreated Control Group). The Treatment group is evaluated one month after receiving LipiFlow® treatment. Study endpoints are evaluated at 3 Months by comparing the Treatment Group to the Untreated Group. To facilitate subject recruitment, the Untreated Control group receives Crossover LipiFlow® treatment (Crossover Treatment Group) at 3 Months. The Crossover Treatment group is evaluated one month after receiving LipiFlow® treatment (4 Months visit).

Interventions

The LipiFlow® Thermal Pulsation System is a prescription device intended for the application of localized heat and pressure therapy in adult patients with chronic cystic conditions of the eyelids, including meibomian gland dysfunction, also known as evaporative dry eye or lipid deficiency dry eye.

Sponsors

TearScience, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction and dry eye * At least 18 years of age * Willing to comply with randomization, attend all study visits and follow patient instructions * Habitual soft contact lens wearer 2 to 18 hours/day and 4 to 7 days/week * No change in contact lens type or dimensions for the past 3 months * Clinician assessment of acceptable contact lens fit and disinfecting solution * Tear film interferometry of 100 units or less

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic disease conditions that cause dry eye * Use of systemic medications known to cause dryness * History of any of the following ocular conditions in the past 3 months: surgery, trauma, Herpes infection, recurrent inflammation, punctal plug insertion or punctal occlusion * Presence of any of the following active conditions: ocular infection, ocular inflammation, moderate to severe allergic conjunctivitis, severe eyelid inflammation, eyelid abnormality that affects lid function, or ocular surface abnormality that compromises corneal integrity * Use of other treatments for meibomian gland dysfunction or dry eye except over the counter lubricants or dietary supplements * Participation in another ophthalmic drug or device trial in the past month * Employee, relative of employee or associate of the clinical site

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Meibomian Gland Score From Baseline at 3 Months3 MonthsThe Primary Endpoint was intended to assess for improvement in meibomian gland function in symptomatic contact lens wearers after LipiFlow treatment in comparison to an untreated control.The Primary Endpoint was defined as the mean change in meibomian gland score in the LipiFlow Treatment group compared to Untreated Control group from Baseline to 3 Months. To determine the meibomian gland score, secretion characteristics of 15 meibomian glands along the lower eyelid were evaluated including five glands each in the temporal, central and nasal regions of the lower eyelid. For each gland, secretion characteristics were graded as 3 (clear liquid), 2 (cloudy liquid), 1 (inspissated/ toothpaste consistency) and 0 (no secretion). The total meibomian gland score is the sum of the grades for all 15 glands with a range between 0 and 45. A higher score reflects less meibomian gland dysfunction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Dry Eye Questionnaire Score From Baseline at 3 Months3 MonthsThe Secondary Endpoint was intended to assess for reduction in dry eye symptoms in symptomatic contact lens after LipiFlow treatment in comparison to an untreated control using the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire. The Secondary Endpoint was defined as the mean change in SPEED score in the LipiFlow Treatment group compared to Untreated Control group from Baseline to 3 Months. Dry eye symptoms evaluated were dryness, grittiness or scratchiness; soreness or irritation; burning or watering; and eye fatigue. Symptom frequency and severity were assessed. The SPEED score is the sum of frequency and severity scores with a range from 0 to 28. A lower SPEED score represents less frequent and/or less severe symptoms.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Comfortable Contact Lens Wear Time From Baseline at 3 Months3 MonthsSubjects reported how long they wore their contact lenses per day (total contact lens wear time) and how long the contact lenses were comfortable (comfortable contact lens wear time). A pre-specified exploratory analysis was to compare the mean change in comfortable contact lens wear time between Baseline and 3 Months for the LipiFlow group vs. untreated control.
Mean Change in Meibomian Gland Score From Baseline at 1 Month1 MonthThe mean change in meibomian gland score from Baseline was also evaluated at 1 Month post-LipiFlow treatment for the LipiFlow and Crossover LipiFlow Groups. The LipiFlow Group was assessed at the 1-Month visit. The Crossover LipiFlow Group was assessed at the 4-Month visit (one month after receiving crossover LipiFlow treatment). There was no planned statistical analysis comparison between the LipiFlow and Crossover LipiFlow groups at 1 Month. To determine the meibomian gland score, secretion characteristics of 15 meibomian glands along the lower eyelid were evaluated including five glands each in the temporal, central and nasal regions of the lower eyelid. For each gland, secretion characteristics were graded as 3 (clear liquid), 2 (cloudy liquid), 1 (inspissated/ toothpaste consistency) and 0 (no secretion). The total meibomian gland score is the sum of the grades for all 15 glands with a range between 0 and 45. A higher score reflects less meibomian gland dysfunction.
Mean Change in Dry Eye Questionnaire From Baseline at 1 Month1 MonthThe mean change in dry eye symptoms from Baseline based on the SPEED questionnaire score was also evaluated at 1 Month post-LipiFlow treatment for the LipiFlow and Crossover LipiFlow Groups. The LipiFlow Group was assessed at the 1-Month visit. The Crossover LipiFlow Group was assessed at the 4-Month visit (one month after receiving cossover LipiFlow treatment). There was no planned statistical analysis comparison between the LipiFlow and Crossover LipiFlow groups at 1 Month. Dry eye symptoms evaluated were dryness, grittiness or scratchiness; soreness or irritation; burning or watering; and eye fatigue. Symptom frequency and severity were assessed. The SPEED score is the sum of frequency and severity scores with a range from 0 to 28. A lower SPEED score represents less frequent and/or less severe symptoms.
Mean Change in Comfortable Contact Lens Wear Time From Baseline at 1 Month1 MonthSubjects reported how long they wore their contact lenses per day (total contact lens wear time) and how long the contact lenses were comfortable (comfortable contact lens wear time). The mean change in comfortable contact lens wear time from Baseline was also evaluated at 1 Month post-LipiFlow treatment for the LipiFlow and Crossover LipiFlow Groups. The LipiFlow Group was assessed at the 1-Month visit. The Crossover LipiFlow Group was assessed at the 4-Month visit (one month after receiving cossover LipiFlow treatment). There was no planned statistical analysis comparison between the LipiFlow and Crossover LipiFlow groups at 1 Month.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LipiFlow
Single 12-minute LipiFlow treatment LipiFlow treatment: The LipiFlow® Thermal Pulsation System is a prescription device intended for the application of localized heat and pressure therapy in adult patients with chronic cystic conditions of the eyelids, including meibomian gland dysfunction, also known as evaporative dry eye or lipid deficiency dry eye.
29
LipiFlow
Single 12-minute LipiFlow treatment LipiFlow treatment: The LipiFlow® Thermal Pulsation System is a prescription device intended for the application of localized heat and pressure therapy in adult patients with chronic cystic conditions of the eyelids, including meibomian gland dysfunction, also known as evaporative dry eye or lipid deficiency dry eye.
58
Untreated Control
Untreated Control (No Intervention)
26
Untreated Control
Untreated Control (No Intervention)
52
Total165

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Randomized StudyWithdrawal by Subject010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLipiFlowTotalUntreated Control
Age, Continuous40.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
41.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
43.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9
Comfortable Contact Lens Wear Time5.4 hours per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
4.9 hours per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
4.3 hours per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants54 Participants25 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Meibomian Gland Score8.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
8.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
8.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
6 Participants12 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants33 Participants16 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
8 Participants16 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 Participants39 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants47 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
SPEED Score14.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
14.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
15.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 290 / 260 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 290 / 260 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 260 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change in Meibomian Gland Score From Baseline at 3 Months

The Primary Endpoint was intended to assess for improvement in meibomian gland function in symptomatic contact lens wearers after LipiFlow treatment in comparison to an untreated control.The Primary Endpoint was defined as the mean change in meibomian gland score in the LipiFlow Treatment group compared to Untreated Control group from Baseline to 3 Months. To determine the meibomian gland score, secretion characteristics of 15 meibomian glands along the lower eyelid were evaluated including five glands each in the temporal, central and nasal regions of the lower eyelid. For each gland, secretion characteristics were graded as 3 (clear liquid), 2 (cloudy liquid), 1 (inspissated/ toothpaste consistency) and 0 (no secretion). The total meibomian gland score is the sum of the grades for all 15 glands with a range between 0 and 45. A higher score reflects less meibomian gland dysfunction.

Time frame: 3 Months

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population of all randomized subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LipiFlowMean Change in Meibomian Gland Score From Baseline at 3 Months12.4 units on a scale
Untreated ControlMean Change in Meibomian Gland Score From Baseline at 3 Months1.4 units on a scale
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [8, 14]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Mean Change in Dry Eye Questionnaire Score From Baseline at 3 Months

The Secondary Endpoint was intended to assess for reduction in dry eye symptoms in symptomatic contact lens after LipiFlow treatment in comparison to an untreated control using the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire. The Secondary Endpoint was defined as the mean change in SPEED score in the LipiFlow Treatment group compared to Untreated Control group from Baseline to 3 Months. Dry eye symptoms evaluated were dryness, grittiness or scratchiness; soreness or irritation; burning or watering; and eye fatigue. Symptom frequency and severity were assessed. The SPEED score is the sum of frequency and severity scores with a range from 0 to 28. A lower SPEED score represents less frequent and/or less severe symptoms.

Time frame: 3 Months

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population of all randomized subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LipiFlowMean Change in Dry Eye Questionnaire Score From Baseline at 3 Months-8.4 units on a scale
Untreated ControlMean Change in Dry Eye Questionnaire Score From Baseline at 3 Months-0.7 units on a scale
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-10.2, -5.2]t-test, 2 sided
Other Pre-specified

Mean Change in Comfortable Contact Lens Wear Time From Baseline at 1 Month

Subjects reported how long they wore their contact lenses per day (total contact lens wear time) and how long the contact lenses were comfortable (comfortable contact lens wear time). The mean change in comfortable contact lens wear time from Baseline was also evaluated at 1 Month post-LipiFlow treatment for the LipiFlow and Crossover LipiFlow Groups. The LipiFlow Group was assessed at the 1-Month visit. The Crossover LipiFlow Group was assessed at the 4-Month visit (one month after receiving cossover LipiFlow treatment). There was no planned statistical analysis comparison between the LipiFlow and Crossover LipiFlow groups at 1 Month.

Time frame: 1 Month

Population: Intent to Treat (all randomized subjects)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LipiFlowMean Change in Comfortable Contact Lens Wear Time From Baseline at 1 Month4.0 hours per day
Untreated ControlMean Change in Comfortable Contact Lens Wear Time From Baseline at 1 Month3.7 hours per day
Other Pre-specified

Mean Change in Comfortable Contact Lens Wear Time From Baseline at 3 Months

Subjects reported how long they wore their contact lenses per day (total contact lens wear time) and how long the contact lenses were comfortable (comfortable contact lens wear time). A pre-specified exploratory analysis was to compare the mean change in comfortable contact lens wear time between Baseline and 3 Months for the LipiFlow group vs. untreated control.

Time frame: 3 Months

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) of all randomized subjects

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LipiFlowMean Change in Comfortable Contact Lens Wear Time From Baseline at 3 Months3.7 hours per day
Untreated ControlMean Change in Comfortable Contact Lens Wear Time From Baseline at 3 Months-0.3 hours per day
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.5, 5.4]t-test, 2 sided
Other Pre-specified

Mean Change in Dry Eye Questionnaire From Baseline at 1 Month

The mean change in dry eye symptoms from Baseline based on the SPEED questionnaire score was also evaluated at 1 Month post-LipiFlow treatment for the LipiFlow and Crossover LipiFlow Groups. The LipiFlow Group was assessed at the 1-Month visit. The Crossover LipiFlow Group was assessed at the 4-Month visit (one month after receiving cossover LipiFlow treatment). There was no planned statistical analysis comparison between the LipiFlow and Crossover LipiFlow groups at 1 Month. Dry eye symptoms evaluated were dryness, grittiness or scratchiness; soreness or irritation; burning or watering; and eye fatigue. Symptom frequency and severity were assessed. The SPEED score is the sum of frequency and severity scores with a range from 0 to 28. A lower SPEED score represents less frequent and/or less severe symptoms.

Time frame: 1 Month

Population: Intent to Treat (All randomized subjects)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LipiFlowMean Change in Dry Eye Questionnaire From Baseline at 1 Month-8.3 units on a scale
Untreated ControlMean Change in Dry Eye Questionnaire From Baseline at 1 Month-8.1 units on a scale
Other Pre-specified

Mean Change in Meibomian Gland Score From Baseline at 1 Month

The mean change in meibomian gland score from Baseline was also evaluated at 1 Month post-LipiFlow treatment for the LipiFlow and Crossover LipiFlow Groups. The LipiFlow Group was assessed at the 1-Month visit. The Crossover LipiFlow Group was assessed at the 4-Month visit (one month after receiving crossover LipiFlow treatment). There was no planned statistical analysis comparison between the LipiFlow and Crossover LipiFlow groups at 1 Month. To determine the meibomian gland score, secretion characteristics of 15 meibomian glands along the lower eyelid were evaluated including five glands each in the temporal, central and nasal regions of the lower eyelid. For each gland, secretion characteristics were graded as 3 (clear liquid), 2 (cloudy liquid), 1 (inspissated/ toothpaste consistency) and 0 (no secretion). The total meibomian gland score is the sum of the grades for all 15 glands with a range between 0 and 45. A higher score reflects less meibomian gland dysfunction.

Time frame: 1 Month

Population: Intent to Treat (All randomized subjects)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LipiFlowMean Change in Meibomian Gland Score From Baseline at 1 Month11.7 units on a scale
Untreated ControlMean Change in Meibomian Gland Score From Baseline at 1 Month14.3 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026