Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of rhNGF Eye Drops at Different Doses in Patients With Dry Eye

An Open-label Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor (rhNGF) Eye Drops at Different Doses in Patients With Dry Eye

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02101281
Enrollment
40
Registered
2014-04-02
Start date
2014-01-20
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2024-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndrome

Keywords

Dry Eye

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of different doses of rhNGF when administered as eye drops to patients with dry eye.

Detailed description

This is an open-label study evaluating safety and efficacy of recombinant human nerve growth factor (rhNGF) eye drops at different doses in patients with Dry Eye

Interventions

DRUGrhNGF 20 µg/mL

1 drop for each eye, twice daily for 28 day

DRUGrhNGF 4 µg/mL

1 drop each eye, twice daily for 28 day

Sponsors

Cross Research S.A.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female patients, ≥ 18 years old; 2. Required use of artificial tears for the treatment of Dry Eye within the 3 months prior to study enrolment; 3. Current use or recommended use of artificial tears for the treatment of Dry Eye; 4. Average VAS score for typical symptoms of Dry Eye (foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, stick feeling, blurred vision and photophobia) ≥ 25 mm; 5. Corneal staining score with lissamine green \> 3 using the NEI corneal grading system in the worse eye (study eye); 6. Conjunctival staining score \> 3 using the NEI conjunctival grading system in the worse eye (study eye); 7. Schirmer test without anaesthesia ≤ 10 mm/5 minutes in the worse eye (study eye); 8. Tear film break-up time (TBUT) ≤ 10 seconds in the worse eye (study eye); 9. A negative urine pregnancy test if female of childbearing potential and must use adequate birth control throughout the study period

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient not suitable to participate in the study in the opinion of the investigator; 2. Patient with a mild or moderate Dry Eye condition (severity level less than 3 according to the Report of the International Dry Eye Workshop -DEWS, 2007) if fourteen (14) patients with mild or moderate dry eye condition have been already enrolled in the current treatment group (Group 1 and Group 2 separately); 3. Patient has had a serious adverse reaction or significant hypersensitivity to any drug or chemically related compounds or has a clinically significant allergy to drugs, foods, amide local anaesthetics or other materials including commercial artificial tears containing Hypromellose (in the opinion of the investigator); 4. Use of topical cyclosporine, topical corticosteroids or any other topical medication for the treatment of dry eye in either eye within 30 days of study enrolment. Use of own artificial tears is allowed until Visit 2; 5. Any ocular disease other than Dry Eye requiring treatment with topical medications in either eye within 30 days of study enrolment; 6. Any active ocular infection or active inflammation in either eye unrelated to Dry Eye; 7. Presence or history of any systemic or ocular disorder, condition or disease that could possibly interfere with the conduct of the required study procedures or the interpretation of the study results; 8. Use of therapeutic or Refractive Contact lenses in either eye within 30 days of study enrolment; 9. History of ocular surgery in the study eye, including corneal refractive procedures, within 90 days of study enrolment; 10. Participation in another clinical study at the same time as the present and within 30 days of study enrolment; 11. History of drug, medication or alcohol abuse or addiction.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Frequency of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56The SANDE is a short questionnaire to evaluate the frequency of ocular dryness and/or irritation symptoms. For the assessment, the patients mark on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) line the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. The VAS score is determined by measuring in millimetres from the left hand end of the line to the point that the patient marks. The SANDE scores (0-100) will be then evaluated for frequency per day.
Change From Baseline in Severity of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56The SANDE is a short questionnaire to evaluate the severity of ocular dryness and/or irritation symptoms. For the assessment, the patients mark on the 100 mm VAS line the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. The VAS score is determined by measuring in millimetres from the left-hand end of the line to the point that the patient marks. The SANDE scores (0-100) will be then evaluated for severity. The higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56The cornea is divided into five sectors (central, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal), each of which is scored on a scale of 0-3, with a maximal score of 15. Both nasally and temporally, the conjunctiva is divided into a superior paralimbal area, an inferior paralimbal area and a peripheral area with a grading scale of 0-3 and with a maximal score of 9 for the nasal and temporal conjunctiva. Staining was derived as the sum of scores in the various sectors. The higher the total score the more compromised is the ocular surface.
Change From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test I - Study EyeBaseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56The Schirmer test type I (without anaesthesia) was performed to measure aqueous tear secretion prior to the instillation of any dilating or anaesthetic eye drops. The rounded tip of a standardized paper strip is inserted into the lower fornix of the eye, and the wetted length extending out from the lower lid is recorded after 5 min of eye closure. Both eyes could be tested at the same time. Changes from baseline in values of Schirmer's test type I are summarised by eye and evaluation visit, and stratified by severity level. The longer the wetted length the healthier the status of the eye. Only study eye's results are reported hereunder.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs),Throughout the study up to day 56The treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded throughout the whole study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Corneal Sensitivity to Contact (Cochet-Bonnet Aesthesiometry)Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56Corneal sensitivity was measured in cm through the Luneau-Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer. This contains a thin, retractable, nylon monofilament that extends up to 6 cm in length. Variable pressure can be applied to the cornea by adjusting the monofilament length. The monofilament length ranges from 6 to 0.5 cm. As the monofilament length is decreased the pressure increases from 11 mm/g to 200 mm/g. The filament is retracted incrementally in 0.5 cm until the patient gives a positive reaction indicating that the contact of the monofilament on the cornea has been sensed. The shorter filament lengths indicate decreased corneal sensation. The length of the filament (in cm) at which the patient sensed the contact with the cornea is recorded. Only study eye's results are reported hereunder.
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56IOP was performed using either Goldmann applanation tonometry or a handheld applanation tonometer (e.g. Tonopen) after the instillation of a topical anaesthetic. IOP was measured in both eyes after completion of all other slit lamp examinations to avoid potential interference with the other evaluations. Only study eye's results are reported hereunder.
Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56The OSDI is based on a 12-item questionnaire designed to provide a rapid assessment of the symptoms of ocular irritation consistent with dry eye disease and their impact on vision-related functioning. The 12 items of the OSDI questionnaire are graded on a 0-4 scale as follows: Grade 0 = none Grade 1 = some Grade 2 = half Grade 3 = most Grade 4 = all The total OSDI score was then calculated on the basis of the following formula: OSDI=\[(sum of scores for all questions answered) × 100\]/\[(total number of questions answered) × 4\]. Thus, the OSDI total score scales from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater disability.
Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (BCDVA)Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56Values of Best-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) scores were measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score. The ETDRS charts use letters, or a geometric progression in letter size from line to line, under standardized lighting conditions. The patient starts at the top of the chart, or on the last row where he or she can read all of the letters, and reads down the chart until he or she reaches a row where a minimum of three letters on a line cannot be read. The patient is scored by how many letters could be correctly identified. Therefore, the higher the number of letters the higher the visual acuity. Changes in the ETDRS score from baseline (screening visit) are summarised by eye (study eye and non study eye) and evaluation visit, and stratified by severity level. Only study eye's results are reported hereunder.
Change From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56A ocular tolerability score was determined using a 100 mm VAS on which 0 meant No symptoms and 100 meant the Worst possible discomfort. The patients subjectively evaluated their ocular symptoms (foreign body sensation, burning or stinging, itching, pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision and photophobia) using the VAS giving the value they were feeling from none to an extreme value. The ocular symptoms were evaluated by the patients through the scale. Only the study eye's results are reported hereunder.
Change From Baseline in Tear Film OsmolarityChanges from baseline up to day 56±4Values of tear film osmolarity and their changes from baseline (screening visit) are summarised by eye (study eye and non study eye) and evaluation visit and stratified by severity level. Only study eye's results are reported hereunder.
Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountBaseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56Four conjunctival impression cytology samples (temporal, nasal, inferior and superior bulbar conjunctiva) for conjunctival goblet cell counts were performed in the worse eye (study eye). Conjunctival epithelium samples are obtained following the instillation of a preservative-free anaesthetic eye drop by slightly pressing on the bulbar conjunctiva a 0.1 μm cellulose acetate filter. When the disc is removed the apical layers of conjunctival epithelium remain impressed on it. Cells on the filter are fixed and stained. The final results will be expressed as mean ± SD of 3 consecutive optic fields for each sample. A higher number of goblet cells indicates a healthier eye.
Mean Frequency of Artificial Tears UseDay 1-Day 8, Day 9-Day 29, Day 30-Day 56 intervalsDuring the treatment with rhNGF at both doses (from day 1 to day 29), and in the follow-up period (from day 29 to day 56) the mean frequency of daily use of artificial tears was measured.
Number of Participants With a Change in Fundus OphthalmoscopyBaseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56This test allows seeing inside the fundus of the eye and other structures using an ophthalmoscope. The fundus examination included assessments of vitreous, macula, retina and optic nerve head for both eyes. Only the results concerning the study eye are reported hereunder. These structures will be assessed according to the criteria outlined below. Vitreous The examiner will judge the appearance of the vitreous in the visual axis. Normal: Absence of any opacity Abnormal: Presence of opacity Macula, (Peripheral) Retina and Optic Nerve Head The examiner will provide a separate assessment of the macular, choroid and peripheral retina Normal: Absence of any structural or vascular change, inflammation, oedema or haemorrhage. Abnormal: Evidence of any ongoing or previous structural/vascular change, inflammation, oedema or haemorrhage.
Change From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationBaseline, Day 1, Day 8, Da 29 and Day 56SLE grading of the eyelids, lashes, conjunctiva, cornea, lens, iris and anterior chamber was done according to the following scales: Eyelid - Meibomian glands (evaluation of the central ten Meibomian gland openings in the mid-portion of the upper eyelid): 0, 1, 2, 3 = None, Mild, Moderate, Severe gland plugging Eyelid - Erythema 0, 1, 2, 3,4 = None, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Very severe redness of lid margin and/or skin Eyelid - Oedema 0, 1, 2, 3,4 = None, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Very severe oedema Lashes 0 = Normal 1 = Abnormal Conjunctiva - Erythema 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 = None, Mild, Moderate, Severe erythema Conjunctiva - Oedema 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 = None, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Very severe swelling Lens 0, 1, 2, 3 = No, Mild, Moderate, Severe opacification N/A = Patient with artificial lens Iris 0 = Normal 1 = Abnormal. Anterior Chamber Inflammation 0, 1, 2, 3, = No, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Very severe Tyndall effect Only the study eye's results are reported hereunder.
Change From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test II - Study EyeBaseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56The Schirmer test type II (with anaesthesia) was performed to measure aqueous tear secretion following the instillation of a preservative-free anaesthetic eye drop (Oxybuprocaine Chlorhydrate 0.4%). The rounded tip of a standardized paper strip is inserted into the lower fornix of the eye, and the wetted length extending out from the lower lid is recorded after 5 min of eye closure. Both eyes could be tested at the same time. Changes from baseline in values of Schirmer's test type I are summarised by eye and evaluation visit and stratified by severity level. The longer the wetted length the healthier the status of the eye. Only study eye's results are reported hereunder.
Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT)Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56TFBUT was measured by determining the time to tear break-up. The TFBUT was performed after instillation of 5 μl of 2% preservative-free sodium fluorescein solution into the inferior conjunctival cul-de-sac of each eye. With the aid of a slit lamp at 10X magnification using cobalt blue illumination, the examiner will monitor the integrity of the tear film, noting the time it takes to form lacunae (clear spaces in the tear film) from the time that the eye is opened after the last blink. The longer the time the better the integrity of the tear film. Only Study eye's results are reported hereunder.
Change From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingBaseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56Fluorescein staining of the cornea is a methodology to visualize corneal epithelial defects under slit lamp microscopy in patients with suspicious or known Dry Eye Disease (DED). Fluorescein dyed - impregnated paper strips were used. Before placing the strip in the lower fornix of the eye, a drop of sterile saline was added to the strip. The cornea was divided into five sectors (central, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal), each of which was scored on a scale of 0-3, with a maximal global score of 15. For a better reading under the slit lamp, no intense illumination beam was used, since it could reduce the contrast and lead to an underestimation of grading. The lower the score the lower the corneal damage.

Countries

Austria

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The investigator included in the study 40 subjects. After inclusion, all the 40 subjects took the study treatment. In detail, the first 20 enrolled subjects received rhNGF 20 μg/mL eye drops (Group 1) and the last 20 enrolled subjects received rhNGF 4 μg/mL eye drops (Group 2).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1 - rhNGF 20 μg/mL
(first planned dose): one drop (35 μL) corresponding to 0.70 μg of rhNGF was instilled into each eye twice a day (b.i.d.) every 12±2 h for a total daily dose of 2.8 μg (both eyes), for 28 consecutive days. Total dose was 78.4 μg/28 days. rhNGF 20 µg/mL: 1 drop for each eye, twice daily for 28 day
20
Group 2 - rhNGF 4 μg/mL
after completion of Group 1 treatment, one drop (35 μL) corresponding to 0.14 μg of rhNGF was instilled into each eye b.i.d. every 12±2 h for a total daily dose of 0.56 μg, for 28 consecutive days. Total dose was 15.68 μg/28 days. rhNGF 4 µg/mL: 1 drop each eye, twice daily for 28 day
20
Total40

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 1 - rhNGF 20 μg/mLGroup 2 - rhNGF 4 μg/mLTotal
Age, Continuous48.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
55.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8
52.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
Region of Enrollment
Austria
20 participants20 participants40 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants17 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 2015 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 201 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Frequency of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)

The SANDE is a short questionnaire to evaluate the frequency of ocular dryness and/or irritation symptoms. For the assessment, the patients mark on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) line the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. The VAS score is determined by measuring in millimetres from the left hand end of the line to the point that the patient marks. The SANDE scores (0-100) will be then evaluated for frequency per day.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56

Population: FAS subjects: all enrolled patients, who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for the efficacy analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Frequency of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Day 1-8.0 Frequency of symptoms per dayStandard Deviation 15.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Frequency of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Day 8-15.0 Frequency of symptoms per dayStandard Deviation 20.1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Frequency of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Day 29-26.9 Frequency of symptoms per dayStandard Deviation 24.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Frequency of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Day 56-30.1 Frequency of symptoms per dayStandard Deviation 18.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Frequency of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Day 56-28.0 Frequency of symptoms per dayStandard Deviation 23.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Frequency of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Day 1-10.0 Frequency of symptoms per dayStandard Deviation 24.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Frequency of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Day 29-24.5 Frequency of symptoms per dayStandard Deviation 22.2
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Frequency of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Day 8-23.4 Frequency of symptoms per dayStandard Deviation 26
Primary

Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)

The cornea is divided into five sectors (central, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal), each of which is scored on a scale of 0-3, with a maximal score of 15. Both nasally and temporally, the conjunctiva is divided into a superior paralimbal area, an inferior paralimbal area and a peripheral area with a grading scale of 0-3 and with a maximal score of 9 for the nasal and temporal conjunctiva. Staining was derived as the sum of scores in the various sectors. The higher the total score the more compromised is the ocular surface.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56

Population: FAS subjects: all enrolled patients, who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for the efficacy analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 29 - Superior Paralimbal Nasal Conjunctiva-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Superior cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 56 - Superior Paralimbal Nasal Conjunctiva-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Nasal cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 1 - Inferior Paralimbal Nasal Conjunctiva-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Superior cornea, Day 1 vs Day -150.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 8 - Inferior Paralimbal Nasal Conjunctiva-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Nasal cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 29 - Inferior Paralimbal Nasal Conjunctiva-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Inferior cornea, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 56 - Inferior Paralimbal Nasal Conjunctiva-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Temporal cornea, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Peripheral Nasal Conjunctiva, Day 1 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Central cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Peripheral Nasal Conjunctiva, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Temporal cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Peripheral Nasal Conjunctiva, Day 29 vs Day -15-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Inferior cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Peripheral Nasal Conjunctiva, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Temporal cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 1 - Superior Paralimbal Temporal Conjunctiva-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Superior cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 8 - Superior Paralimbal Temporal Conjunctiva-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Temporal cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 29 - Superior Paralimbal Temporal Conjunctiva-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Inferior cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 56 - Superior Paralimbal Temporal Conjunctiva-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Total score cornea, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 1 - Inferior Paralimbal Temporal Conjunctiva-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Central cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 8 - Inferior Paralimbal Temporal Conjunctiva-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Total score cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 29 - Inferior Paralimbal Temporal Conjunctiva-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Inferior cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 56 - Inferior Paralimbal Temporal Conjunctiva-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Total score cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Peripheral Temporal Conjunctiva, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Superior cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Peripheral Temporal Conjunctiva, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Total score cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Peripheral Temporal Conjunctiva, Day 29 vs Day -15-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Nasal cornea, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Peripheral Temporal Conjunctiva, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 1 - Superior Paralimbal Nasal Conjunctiva-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Total Score Conjunctiva, Day 1 vs Day -15-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Central cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Total Score Conjunctiva, Day 8 vs Day -15-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 8 - Superior Paralimbal Nasal Conjunctiva-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Total Score Conjunctiva, Day 29 vs Day -15-5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Nasal cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Total Score Conjunctiva, Day 56 vs Day -15-3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Central cornea, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Total Score Conjunctiva, Day 56 vs Day -15-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Central cornea, Day 1 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Central cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Central cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Central cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Superior cornea, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Superior cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Superior cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Superior cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Inferior cornea, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Inferior cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Inferior cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Inferior cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Nasal cornea, Day 1 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Nasal cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Nasal cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Nasal cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Temporal cornea, Day 1 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Temporal cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Temporal cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Temporal cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Total score cornea, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Total score cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Total score cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Total score cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 1 - Superior Paralimbal Nasal Conjunctiva0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 8 - Superior Paralimbal Nasal Conjunctiva-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 29 - Superior Paralimbal Nasal Conjunctiva-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 56 - Superior Paralimbal Nasal Conjunctiva-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 1 - Inferior Paralimbal Nasal Conjunctiva0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 8 - Inferior Paralimbal Nasal Conjunctiva-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 29 - Inferior Paralimbal Nasal Conjunctiva-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 56 - Inferior Paralimbal Nasal Conjunctiva-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Peripheral Nasal Conjunctiva, Day 1 vs Day -150.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Peripheral Nasal Conjunctiva, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Peripheral Nasal Conjunctiva, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Peripheral Nasal Conjunctiva, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 1 - Superior Paralimbal Temporal Conjunctiva0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 8 - Superior Paralimbal Temporal Conjunctiva-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 29 - Superior Paralimbal Temporal Conjunctiva-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 56 - Superior Paralimbal Temporal Conjunctiva-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 1 - Inferior Paralimbal Temporal Conjunctiva0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 8 - Inferior Paralimbal Temporal Conjunctiva0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 29 - Inferior Paralimbal Temporal Conjunctiva-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Day 56 - Inferior Paralimbal Temporal Conjunctiva-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Peripheral Temporal Conjunctiva, Day 1 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Peripheral Temporal Conjunctiva, Day 8 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Peripheral Temporal Conjunctiva, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Peripheral Temporal Conjunctiva, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Total Score Conjunctiva, Day 1 vs Day -150.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Total Score Conjunctiva, Day 8 vs Day -15-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale)Total Score Conjunctiva, Day 29 vs Day -15-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Primary

Change From Baseline in Severity of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)

The SANDE is a short questionnaire to evaluate the severity of ocular dryness and/or irritation symptoms. For the assessment, the patients mark on the 100 mm VAS line the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. The VAS score is determined by measuring in millimetres from the left-hand end of the line to the point that the patient marks. The SANDE scores (0-100) will be then evaluated for severity. The higher the score, the worse the outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56

Population: FAS subjects: all enrolled patients, who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for the efficacy analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Severity of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Day 1-7.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Severity of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Day 8-11.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Severity of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Day 29-27.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.4
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Severity of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Day 56-29.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Severity of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Day 56-28.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Severity of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Day 1-9.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Severity of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Day 29-28.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.4
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Severity of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE)Day 8-21.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.6
Primary

Change From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test I - Study Eye

The Schirmer test type I (without anaesthesia) was performed to measure aqueous tear secretion prior to the instillation of any dilating or anaesthetic eye drops. The rounded tip of a standardized paper strip is inserted into the lower fornix of the eye, and the wetted length extending out from the lower lid is recorded after 5 min of eye closure. Both eyes could be tested at the same time. Changes from baseline in values of Schirmer's test type I are summarised by eye and evaluation visit, and stratified by severity level. The longer the wetted length the healthier the status of the eye. Only study eye's results are reported hereunder.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56

Population: FAS subjects:

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test I - Study EyeDay 1 vs Day -151.3 millimetersStandard Deviation 4.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test I - Study EyeDay 8 vs Day -154.5 millimetersStandard Deviation 7.2
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test I - Study EyeDay 29 vs Day -155.3 millimetersStandard Deviation 6.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test I - Study EyeDay 56 vs Day -154.6 millimetersStandard Deviation 8.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test I - Study EyeDay 56 vs Day -154.6 millimetersStandard Deviation 6.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test I - Study EyeDay 1 vs Day -151.4 millimetersStandard Deviation 5.2
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test I - Study EyeDay 29 vs Day -153.2 millimetersStandard Deviation 6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test I - Study EyeDay 8 vs Day -150.8 millimetersStandard Deviation 5.6
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs),

The treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded throughout the whole study.

Time frame: Throughout the study up to day 56

Population: Safety set: all patients who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for the safety analysis

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs),14 Participants
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs),15 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' Count

Four conjunctival impression cytology samples (temporal, nasal, inferior and superior bulbar conjunctiva) for conjunctival goblet cell counts were performed in the worse eye (study eye). Conjunctival epithelium samples are obtained following the instillation of a preservative-free anaesthetic eye drop by slightly pressing on the bulbar conjunctiva a 0.1 μm cellulose acetate filter. When the disc is removed the apical layers of conjunctival epithelium remain impressed on it. Cells on the filter are fixed and stained. The final results will be expressed as mean ± SD of 3 consecutive optic fields for each sample. A higher number of goblet cells indicates a healthier eye.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56

Population: FAS: all enrolled patients, who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountTemporal Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 1 vs Day -15-2.04 cell countsStandard Deviation 7.66
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountTemporal Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 8 vs Day -15-2.25 cell countsStandard Deviation 6.73
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountTemporal Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 29 vs Day -150.03 cell countsStandard Deviation 11.18
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountTemporal Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 56 vs Day -15-2.47 cell countsStandard Deviation 7.86
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountNasal Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.84 cell countsStandard Deviation 8.55
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountNasal Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 8 vs Day -150.98 cell countsStandard Deviation 14.02
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountNasal Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 29 vs Day -150.96 cell countsStandard Deviation 9.14
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountNasal Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 56 vs Day -150.99 cell countsStandard Deviation 12.81
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountInferior Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 1 vs Day -15-2.77 cell countsStandard Deviation 7.49
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountInferior Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 8 vs Day -15-1.11 cell countsStandard Deviation 11.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountInferior Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 29 vs Day -15-3.79 cell countsStandard Deviation 7.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountInferior Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 56 vs Day -15-1.60 cell countsStandard Deviation 8.94
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountSuperior Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 1 vs Day -15-2.28 cell countsStandard Deviation 9.87
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountSuperior Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 8 vs Day -15-2.48 cell countsStandard Deviation 12.53
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountSuperior Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 29 vs Day -15-4.44 cell countsStandard Deviation 10.16
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountSuperior Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 56 vs Day -15-1.09 cell countsStandard Deviation 10.45
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountSuperior Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 56 vs Day -151.07 cell countsStandard Deviation 1.99
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountTemporal Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.19 cell countsStandard Deviation 3.4
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountInferior Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 1 vs Day -15-2.17 cell countsStandard Deviation 4.65
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountTemporal Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 8 vs Day -150.16 cell countsStandard Deviation 2.19
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountSuperior Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 1 vs Day -150.73 cell countsStandard Deviation 2.23
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountTemporal Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 29 vs Day -150.83 cell countsStandard Deviation 2.72
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountInferior Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 8 vs Day -15-1.33 cell countsStandard Deviation 3.41
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountTemporal Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 56 vs Day -150.00 cell countsStandard Deviation 2.76
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountSuperior Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 29 vs Day -150.44 cell countsStandard Deviation 1.93
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountNasal Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.52 cell countsStandard Deviation 2.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountInferior Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 29 vs Day -15-1.60 cell countsStandard Deviation 3.11
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountNasal Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 8 vs Day -151.24 cell countsStandard Deviation 4.06
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountSuperior Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 8 vs Day -150.33 cell countsStandard Deviation 2.35
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountNasal Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.06 cell countsStandard Deviation 2.98
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountInferior Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 56 vs Day -15-1.07 cell countsStandard Deviation 4.46
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Impression Cytology for Goblet Cells' CountNasal Bulbar Conjunctiva, Day 56 vs Day -151.19 cell countsStandard Deviation 3.89
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein Staining

Fluorescein staining of the cornea is a methodology to visualize corneal epithelial defects under slit lamp microscopy in patients with suspicious or known Dry Eye Disease (DED). Fluorescein dyed - impregnated paper strips were used. Before placing the strip in the lower fornix of the eye, a drop of sterile saline was added to the strip. The cornea was divided into five sectors (central, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal), each of which was scored on a scale of 0-3, with a maximal global score of 15. For a better reading under the slit lamp, no intense illumination beam was used, since it could reduce the contrast and lead to an underestimation of grading. The lower the score the lower the corneal damage.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56

Population: FAS: all enrolled patients, who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingTotal score cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingInferior cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingSuperior cornea, Day 1 vs Day -150.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingInferior cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15n-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingCentral cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingNasal cornea, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingSuperior cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingNasal cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingTotal score cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingNasal cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingSuperior cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingNasal cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingCentral cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingTemporal cornea, Day 1 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingSuperior cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingTemporal cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingCentral cornea, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein Stainingtemporal cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingInferior cornea, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingTemporal cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingCentral cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingTotal score cornea, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingInferior cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingTotal score cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingNasal cornea, Day 1 vs Day -150.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingTotal score cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingTotal score cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingCentral cornea, Day 1 vs Day -150.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingCentral cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingCentral cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingCentral cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingSuperior cornea, Day 1 vs Day -150.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingSuperior cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingSuperior cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingSuperior cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingInferior cornea, Day 1 vs Day -150.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingInferior cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingInferior cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingInferior cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15n-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingTotal score cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingNasal cornea, Day 8 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingNasal cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingNasal cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingTemporal cornea, Day 1 vs Day -150.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingTemporal cornea, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein Stainingtemporal cornea, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingTemporal cornea, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein StainingTotal score cornea, Day 1 vs Day -150.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Corneal Sensitivity to Contact (Cochet-Bonnet Aesthesiometry)

Corneal sensitivity was measured in cm through the Luneau-Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer. This contains a thin, retractable, nylon monofilament that extends up to 6 cm in length. Variable pressure can be applied to the cornea by adjusting the monofilament length. The monofilament length ranges from 6 to 0.5 cm. As the monofilament length is decreased the pressure increases from 11 mm/g to 200 mm/g. The filament is retracted incrementally in 0.5 cm until the patient gives a positive reaction indicating that the contact of the monofilament on the cornea has been sensed. The shorter filament lengths indicate decreased corneal sensation. The length of the filament (in cm) at which the patient sensed the contact with the cornea is recorded. Only study eye's results are reported hereunder.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56

Population: FAS: all enrolled patients, who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Sensitivity to Contact (Cochet-Bonnet Aesthesiometry)Filament Length of Contact Sensation,Day1vsDay-150.05 cmStandard Deviation 0.58
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Sensitivity to Contact (Cochet-Bonnet Aesthesiometry)Filament Length of Contact Sensation,Day8vsDay-150.03 cmStandard Deviation 0.41
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Sensitivity to Contact (Cochet-Bonnet Aesthesiometry)Filament Length of Contact Sensation,Day29vsDay-150.33 cmStandard Deviation 0.82
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Sensitivity to Contact (Cochet-Bonnet Aesthesiometry)Filament Length of Contact Sensation,Day56vsDay-150.28 cmStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Sensitivity to Contact (Cochet-Bonnet Aesthesiometry)Filament Length of Contact Sensation,Day56vsDay-150.50 cmStandard Deviation 1.19
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Sensitivity to Contact (Cochet-Bonnet Aesthesiometry)Filament Length of Contact Sensation,Day1vsDay-150.20 cmStandard Deviation 0.41
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Sensitivity to Contact (Cochet-Bonnet Aesthesiometry)Filament Length of Contact Sensation,Day29vsDay-150.39 cmStandard Deviation 1.25
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Corneal Sensitivity to Contact (Cochet-Bonnet Aesthesiometry)Filament Length of Contact Sensation,Day8vsDay-150.38 cmStandard Deviation 0.94
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

IOP was performed using either Goldmann applanation tonometry or a handheld applanation tonometer (e.g. Tonopen) after the instillation of a topical anaesthetic. IOP was measured in both eyes after completion of all other slit lamp examinations to avoid potential interference with the other evaluations. Only study eye's results are reported hereunder.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56

Population: FAS: all enrolled patients, who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)Day 1 vs Day -15-0.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)Day 29 vs Day -15-1.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)Day 56 vs Day -15-1.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)Day 8 vs Day -15-1.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.2
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)Day 56 vs Day -150.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)Day 1 vs Day -150.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)Day 8 vs Day -150.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.2
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)Day 29 vs Day -151.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)

The OSDI is based on a 12-item questionnaire designed to provide a rapid assessment of the symptoms of ocular irritation consistent with dry eye disease and their impact on vision-related functioning. The 12 items of the OSDI questionnaire are graded on a 0-4 scale as follows: Grade 0 = none Grade 1 = some Grade 2 = half Grade 3 = most Grade 4 = all The total OSDI score was then calculated on the basis of the following formula: OSDI=\[(sum of scores for all questions answered) × 100\]/\[(total number of questions answered) × 4\]. Thus, the OSDI total score scales from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater disability.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56

Population: FAS: all enrolled patients, who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)Day 1 vs Day -15-5.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.38
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)Day 8 vs Day -15-14.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.03
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)Day 29 vs Day -15-22.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.73
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)Day 56 vs Day -15-23.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.72
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)Day 56 vs Day -15-14.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.91
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)Day 1 vs Day -15-0.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)Day 29 vs Day -15-18.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.78
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)Day 8 vs Day -15-10.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.88
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)

A ocular tolerability score was determined using a 100 mm VAS on which 0 meant No symptoms and 100 meant the Worst possible discomfort. The patients subjectively evaluated their ocular symptoms (foreign body sensation, burning or stinging, itching, pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision and photophobia) using the VAS giving the value they were feeling from none to an extreme value. The ocular symptoms were evaluated by the patients through the scale. Only the study eye's results are reported hereunder.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56

Population: FAS: all enrolled patients, who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for the efficacy analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Pain, Day 29 vs Day -15-24.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Burning/Stinging, Day 1vs Day -15-21.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Pain, Day 56 vs Day -15-24.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Itching, Day 1 vs Day -15-14.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.4
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Sticky feeling, Day 1 vs Day -15-9.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Foreign Body Sensation, Day 8 vs Day -15-25.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Sticky feeling, Day 8 vs Day -15-11.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Itching, Day 8 vs Day -15-23.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Sticky feeling, Day 29 vs Day -15-12.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Burning/Stinging, Day 8 vs Day -15-25.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Sticky feeling, Day 56 vs Day -15-13.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Itching, Day 29 vs Day -15-30.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Blurred vision, Day 1 vs Day -15-24.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Foreign Body Sensation, Day 56 vs Day -15-30.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Blurred vision, Day 8 vs Day -15-29.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Itching, Day 56 vs Day -15-26.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Blurred vision, Day 29 vs Day -15-41.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.4
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Burning/Stinging, Day 29 vs Day -15-32.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Blurred vision, Day 56 vs Day -15-39.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.4
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Pain - Day 1 vs Day -15-19.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Photophobia, Day 1 vs Day -15-21.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Foreign Body Sensation, Day 29 vs Day -15-31.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Photophobia, Day 8 vs Day -15-27.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Pain, Day 8 vs Day -15-15.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Photophobia, Day 29 vs Day -15-31.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Burning/Stinging, Day 56 vs Day -15-30.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Photophobia, Day 56 vs Day -15-32.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Foreign Body Sensation, Day 1 vs Day -15-18.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Photophobia, Day 56 vs Day -15-23.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Foreign Body Sensation, Day 1 vs Day -15-1.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Foreign Body Sensation, Day 8 vs Day -15-19.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Foreign Body Sensation, Day 29 vs Day -15-30.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Foreign Body Sensation, Day 56 vs Day -15-29.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.2
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Burning/Stinging, Day 1vs Day -15-7.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Burning/Stinging, Day 8 vs Day -15-13.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Burning/Stinging, Day 29 vs Day -15-24.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Burning/Stinging, Day 56 vs Day -15-29.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Itching, Day 1 vs Day -15-14.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Itching, Day 8 vs Day -15-24.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Itching, Day 29 vs Day -15-33.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Itching, Day 56 vs Day -15-35.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Pain - Day 1 vs Day -15-2.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Pain, Day 8 vs Day -15-4.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Pain, Day 29 vs Day -15-14.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Pain, Day 56 vs Day -15-16.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Sticky feeling, Day 1 vs Day -15-1.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Sticky feeling, Day 8 vs Day -15-16.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Sticky feeling, Day 29 vs Day -15-22.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Sticky feeling, Day 56 vs Day -15-22.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Blurred vision, Day 1 vs Day -15-7.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Blurred vision, Day 8 vs Day -15-17.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Blurred vision, Day 29 vs Day -15-31.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Blurred vision, Day 56 vs Day -15-28.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.2
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Photophobia, Day 1 vs Day -155.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Photophobia, Day 8 vs Day -15-10.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Ocular Tolerability (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)Photophobia, Day 29 vs Day -15-20.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 42.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Slit Lamp Examination

SLE grading of the eyelids, lashes, conjunctiva, cornea, lens, iris and anterior chamber was done according to the following scales: Eyelid - Meibomian glands (evaluation of the central ten Meibomian gland openings in the mid-portion of the upper eyelid): 0, 1, 2, 3 = None, Mild, Moderate, Severe gland plugging Eyelid - Erythema 0, 1, 2, 3,4 = None, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Very severe redness of lid margin and/or skin Eyelid - Oedema 0, 1, 2, 3,4 = None, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Very severe oedema Lashes 0 = Normal 1 = Abnormal Conjunctiva - Erythema 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 = None, Mild, Moderate, Severe erythema Conjunctiva - Oedema 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 = None, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Very severe swelling Lens 0, 1, 2, 3 = No, Mild, Moderate, Severe opacification N/A = Patient with artificial lens Iris 0 = Normal 1 = Abnormal. Anterior Chamber Inflammation 0, 1, 2, 3, = No, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Very severe Tyndall effect Only the study eye's results are reported hereunder.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Da 29 and Day 56

Population: FAS: all enrolled patients, who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for the efficacy analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva - Erythema, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - erythema, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva - Erythema, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - Oedema, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva - Oedema, Day 1 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - Meibomian glands, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva - Oedema, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - Oedema, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva - Oedema, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - erythema, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva - Oedema, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationLashes, Day 1 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationLens, Day 1 vs Day -150.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - Meibomian glands, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationLens, Day 8 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationLashes, Day 8 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationLens, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - erythema, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationLens, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationLashes, Day 29 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationIris, Day 1 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - erythema, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationIris, Day 8 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationLashes, Day 56 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationIris, Day 29 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - Oedema, Day 1 vs Day -150.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationIris, Day 56 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva - Erythema, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationAnterior Chamber Inflammation, Day 1 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - Meibomian glands, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationAnterior Chamber Inflammation, Day 8 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva - Erythema, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationAnterior Chamber Inflammation, Day 29 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - Oedema, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationAnterior Chamber Inflammation, Day 56 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - Meibomian glands, Day 1 vs Day -150.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationAnterior Chamber Inflammation, Day 56 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - Meibomian glands, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - Meibomian glands, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - Meibomian glands, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - Meibomian glands, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - erythema, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - erythema, Day 8 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - erythema, Day 29 vs Day -150.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - erythema, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - Oedema, Day 1 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - Oedema, Day 8 vs Day -150.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - Oedema, Day 29 vs Day -150.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationEyelid - Oedema, Day 56 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationLashes, Day 1 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationLashes, Day 8 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationLashes, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationLashes, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva - Erythema, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva - Erythema, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva - Erythema, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva - Erythema, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva - Oedema, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva - Oedema, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva - Oedema, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva - Oedema, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationLens, Day 1 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationLens, Day 8 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationLens, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationLens, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationIris, Day 1 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationIris, Day 8 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationIris, Day 29 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationIris, Day 56 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationAnterior Chamber Inflammation, Day 1 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationAnterior Chamber Inflammation, Day 8 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Slit Lamp ExaminationAnterior Chamber Inflammation, Day 29 vs Day -150.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT)

TFBUT was measured by determining the time to tear break-up. The TFBUT was performed after instillation of 5 μl of 2% preservative-free sodium fluorescein solution into the inferior conjunctival cul-de-sac of each eye. With the aid of a slit lamp at 10X magnification using cobalt blue illumination, the examiner will monitor the integrity of the tear film, noting the time it takes to form lacunae (clear spaces in the tear film) from the time that the eye is opened after the last blink. The longer the time the better the integrity of the tear film. Only Study eye's results are reported hereunder.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56

Population: FAS: all enrolled patients, who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for the efficacy analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT)Average Tear Film Break-Up Time, Day 1 vs Day -150.6 secondsStandard Deviation 2.1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT)Average Tear Film Break-Up Time, Day 8 vs Day -151.5 secondsStandard Deviation 2.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT)Average Tear Film Break-Up Time, Day 29 vs Day -152.6 secondsStandard Deviation 2.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT)Average Tear Film Break-Up Time, Day 56 vs Day -152.2 secondsStandard Deviation 2.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT)Average Tear Film Break-Up Time, Day 56 vs Day -15-0.3 secondsStandard Deviation 2.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT)Average Tear Film Break-Up Time, Day 1 vs Day -15-0.7 secondsStandard Deviation 1.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT)Average Tear Film Break-Up Time, Day 29 vs Day -15-0.6 secondsStandard Deviation 2.2
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT)Average Tear Film Break-Up Time, Day 8 vs Day -15-0.3 secondsStandard Deviation 2.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Tear Film Osmolarity

Values of tear film osmolarity and their changes from baseline (screening visit) are summarised by eye (study eye and non study eye) and evaluation visit and stratified by severity level. Only study eye's results are reported hereunder.

Time frame: Changes from baseline up to day 56±4

Population: FAS: all enrolled patients, who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Film OsmolarityDay 1 vs Day -15-9.1 mOsm/LStandard Deviation 13.1
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Film OsmolarityDay 8 vs Day -15-4.1 mOsm/LStandard Deviation 16.2
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Film OsmolarityDay 29 vs Day -15-5.5 mOsm/LStandard Deviation 10.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Film OsmolarityDay 56 vs Day -15-4.8 mOsm/LStandard Deviation 14.2
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Film OsmolarityDay 56 vs Day -154.1 mOsm/LStandard Deviation 19.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Film OsmolarityDay 1 vs Day -15-0.8 mOsm/LStandard Deviation 18.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Film OsmolarityDay 29 vs Day -15-1.4 mOsm/LStandard Deviation 19
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Film OsmolarityDay 8 vs Day -150.5 mOsm/LStandard Deviation 15
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test II - Study Eye

The Schirmer test type II (with anaesthesia) was performed to measure aqueous tear secretion following the instillation of a preservative-free anaesthetic eye drop (Oxybuprocaine Chlorhydrate 0.4%). The rounded tip of a standardized paper strip is inserted into the lower fornix of the eye, and the wetted length extending out from the lower lid is recorded after 5 min of eye closure. Both eyes could be tested at the same time. Changes from baseline in values of Schirmer's test type I are summarised by eye and evaluation visit and stratified by severity level. The longer the wetted length the healthier the status of the eye. Only study eye's results are reported hereunder.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56

Population: FAS: all enrolled patients, who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test II - Study EyeDay 1 vs Day -15-2.0 millimetersStandard Deviation 9.5
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test II - Study EyeDay 8 vs Day -151.6 millimetersStandard Deviation 13.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test II - Study EyeDay 29 vs Day -153.8 millimetersStandard Deviation 8.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test II - Study EyeDay 56 vs Day -152.2 millimetersStandard Deviation 11.4
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test II - Study EyeDay 56 vs Day -156.9 millimetersStandard Deviation 5.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test II - Study EyeDay 1 vs Day -152.5 millimetersStandard Deviation 5.7
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test II - Study EyeDay 29 vs Day -156.5 millimetersStandard Deviation 8.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Tear Wetting Distance as Determined by Schirmer Tear Test II - Study EyeDay 8 vs Day -152.1 millimetersStandard Deviation 5.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (BCDVA)

Values of Best-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) scores were measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score. The ETDRS charts use letters, or a geometric progression in letter size from line to line, under standardized lighting conditions. The patient starts at the top of the chart, or on the last row where he or she can read all of the letters, and reads down the chart until he or she reaches a row where a minimum of three letters on a line cannot be read. The patient is scored by how many letters could be correctly identified. Therefore, the higher the number of letters the higher the visual acuity. Changes in the ETDRS score from baseline (screening visit) are summarised by eye (study eye and non study eye) and evaluation visit, and stratified by severity level. Only study eye's results are reported hereunder.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56

Population: FAS: all enrolled patients, who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Visual Acuity (BCDVA)Day 1 vs Day -150.7 lettersStandard Deviation 2.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Visual Acuity (BCDVA)Day 29 vs Day -151.3 lettersStandard Deviation 3.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Visual Acuity (BCDVA)Day 8 vs Day -150.5 lettersStandard Deviation 2.9
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Visual Acuity (BCDVA)Day 56 vs Day -151.2 lettersStandard Deviation 3.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Visual Acuity (BCDVA)Day 8 vs Day -153.4 lettersStandard Deviation 6.3
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Visual Acuity (BCDVA)Day 1 vs Day -151.6 lettersStandard Deviation 5.8
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Visual Acuity (BCDVA)Day 56 vs Day -156.7 lettersStandard Deviation 10.6
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLChange From Baseline in Visual Acuity (BCDVA)Day 29 vs Day -155.1 lettersStandard Deviation 11.7
Secondary

Mean Frequency of Artificial Tears Use

During the treatment with rhNGF at both doses (from day 1 to day 29), and in the follow-up period (from day 29 to day 56) the mean frequency of daily use of artificial tears was measured.

Time frame: Day 1-Day 8, Day 9-Day 29, Day 30-Day 56 intervals

Population: FAS: all enrolled patients, who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLMean Frequency of Artificial Tears UseDay 9-Day 292.133 uses per dayStandard Deviation 2.814
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLMean Frequency of Artificial Tears UseDay 1-Day 81.813 uses per dayStandard Deviation 1.894
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLMean Frequency of Artificial Tears UseDay 30-Day 562.869 uses per dayStandard Deviation 2.961
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLMean Frequency of Artificial Tears UseDay 1-Day 81.083 uses per dayStandard Deviation 1.541
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLMean Frequency of Artificial Tears UseDay 9-Day 291.271 uses per dayStandard Deviation 1.334
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLMean Frequency of Artificial Tears UseDay 30-Day 562.460 uses per dayStandard Deviation 2.86
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Change in Fundus Ophthalmoscopy

This test allows seeing inside the fundus of the eye and other structures using an ophthalmoscope. The fundus examination included assessments of vitreous, macula, retina and optic nerve head for both eyes. Only the results concerning the study eye are reported hereunder. These structures will be assessed according to the criteria outlined below. Vitreous The examiner will judge the appearance of the vitreous in the visual axis. Normal: Absence of any opacity Abnormal: Presence of opacity Macula, (Peripheral) Retina and Optic Nerve Head The examiner will provide a separate assessment of the macular, choroid and peripheral retina Normal: Absence of any structural or vascular change, inflammation, oedema or haemorrhage. Abnormal: Evidence of any ongoing or previous structural/vascular change, inflammation, oedema or haemorrhage.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 8, Day 29 and Day 56

Population: FAS: all enrolled patients, who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLNumber of Participants With a Change in Fundus OphthalmoscopyVitreous, Day 1 vs Day -150 Participants
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLNumber of Participants With a Change in Fundus OphthalmoscopyVitreous, Day 8 vs Day -150 Participants
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLNumber of Participants With a Change in Fundus OphthalmoscopyVitreous, Day 29 vs Day -150 Participants
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLNumber of Participants With a Change in Fundus OphthalmoscopyVitreous, Day 56 vs Day -150 Participants
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLNumber of Participants With a Change in Fundus OphthalmoscopyMacula, Retina and Optic Nerve Head - Day 10 Participants
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLNumber of Participants With a Change in Fundus OphthalmoscopyMacula, Retina and Optic Nerve Head - Day 80 Participants
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLNumber of Participants With a Change in Fundus OphthalmoscopyMacula, Retina and Optic Nerve Head - Day 290 Participants
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 20 μg/mLNumber of Participants With a Change in Fundus OphthalmoscopyMacula, Retina and Optic Nerve Head - Day 560 Participants
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLNumber of Participants With a Change in Fundus OphthalmoscopyMacula, Retina and Optic Nerve Head - Day 560 Participants
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLNumber of Participants With a Change in Fundus OphthalmoscopyVitreous, Day 1 vs Day -150 Participants
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLNumber of Participants With a Change in Fundus OphthalmoscopyMacula, Retina and Optic Nerve Head - Day 10 Participants
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLNumber of Participants With a Change in Fundus OphthalmoscopyVitreous, Day 8 vs Day -150 Participants
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLNumber of Participants With a Change in Fundus OphthalmoscopyMacula, Retina and Optic Nerve Head - Day 290 Participants
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLNumber of Participants With a Change in Fundus OphthalmoscopyVitreous, Day 29 vs Day -150 Participants
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLNumber of Participants With a Change in Fundus OphthalmoscopyMacula, Retina and Optic Nerve Head - Day 80 Participants
SANDE Changes From Baseline With rhNGF 4 μg/mLNumber of Participants With a Change in Fundus OphthalmoscopyVitreous, Day 56 vs Day -150 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026