Skip to content

Open Label Study of Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin (SCIg) in Myasthenia Gravis

Open Label Study of Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin (SCIg) in Myasthenia Gravis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02100969
Enrollment
23
Registered
2014-04-01
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2018-01-31
Last updated
2021-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myasthenia Gravis

Keywords

MG, Hizentra, autoimmune neuromuscular disorder

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Hizentra is a safe and effective treatment for people with myasthenia gravis (MG).

Detailed description

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disorder which causes the muscles to become weak because the immune system attacks the connection between the nerves and the muscles. Hizentra is a subcutaneous (under the skin) immunoglobin (SCIg). An immunoglobin is a blood protein. Hizentra is being studied for the treatment of patients with MG. Hizentra is administered by an injection into the skin through a portable infusion pump, which may be easier for patients to administer than the current treatments. Participants will be asked to complete 9 clinic visits and 3 telephone calls. It could take up to 30 weeks to complete all study visits.

Interventions

DRUGHIZENTRA ®

Patients must fulfill inclusion criteria and remain stable at week 0, which means QMG does not increase by 3 points, will enter receive Hizentra for 12 weeks.

Sponsors

CSL Behring
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Mazen Dimachkie, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients 18 and older * Patients must have prior or current documentation of MGFA MG grades 2, 3, or 4 generalized MG, according to the MGFA classification system.48 These grades correspond to mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4) * Elevated AChR or MuSK Ab. These tests will have been performed at some time prior to entry into the study. Double seronegative MG patients with prior documentation of an abnormal decrement (\>10%) on slow repetitive nerve stimulation or an abnormal single fiber EMG will also be allowed to participate * Patient's signs and symptoms should not be better explained by another disease process. * IVIg maintenance dose of 0.2 to 2 gm/kg/4 weeks or equivalent dose administered Q 2-4 weeks±3days * Stable IVIg for at least 3 cycles (definition of stability: no change in prescribed dosage or frequency by the treating physician) * Patient must be receiving no more than 200g/4weeks of IVIg. * Patients must be willing to complete the study and return for follow-up visits. * Patients must be willing to give written informed consent before participating in this study. A copy of the signed consent must be kept in the patient's medical record. * Patients can be on the following drugs as long as there has been no dose change for 60 days: azathioprine, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, methotrexate or other immunosuppressive drugs. * Patients can be on prednisone as long as there has been no dose change for 30 days.

Exclusion criteria

* MGFA grade V within 6 months of screening. * A history of chronic degenerative, psychiatric, or neurologic disorder other than MG that can produce weakness or fatigue. * Other major chronic or debilitating illnesses within six months prior to study entry. * Female patients who are premenopausal and are: (a) pregnant on the basis of a serum pregnancy test, (b) breast-feeding, or (c) not using an effective method of double barrier (1 hormonal plus 1 barrier method or 2 simultaneous barrier methods) birth control (birth control pills, male condom, female condom, intrauterine device, Norplant, tubal ligation, or other sterilization procedures). * Altered levels of consciousness, dementia, or abnormal mental status. * Thymectomy in the previous three months. * Evidence of renal insufficiency (Cr\>1.5 x elevated) or liver disease (transaminases \> 2.5 x elevation) at screening. * Skin disease that would interfere with assessment of injection site reaction * History of severe reactions to IVIg or SCIg. * Participation in a research study within the last 3 months * Treatment with rituximab or other biologics within 12 months of study entry * Inability to provide informed consent. * History of thrombotic episodes within the last year prior to enrollment * Known allergic or other severe reactions to blood products including intolerability to previous normal human immunoglobulin for intravenous administration (IVIG) and/or subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG), such as history of clinically relevant hemolysis after IVIG infusion, aseptic meningitis, recurrent severe headache, hypersensitivity, severe generalized or severe local skin reaction. * History of IgA deficiency or evidence of IgA deficiency at screening.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Patients Whose Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Scores Are Increased by no More Than 3 Points at the End of the SCIg Treatment PhaseChange from Baseline to Week 12The QMG is a 13 item ordinal scale which measures ocular, bulbar, extremity fatigue and strength, along with respiratory function. The scale is from 0 - 3 for each item, with 0 meaning normal and 3 is severe. Total score can range from 0 to 39. Change in MG severity will be measured using the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score for Disease severity. The QMG is a validated clinical composite scale. As mentioned in the protocol, our hypotheses are: H0: Proportion of patients whose QMG scores are increased by more than 3 points at the end of the SCIg treatment phase ≤ 0.65 HA: Proportion of patients whose QMG scores are increased by no more than 3 points at the end of the SCIg treatment phase \> 0.65 Thus, analysis of the primary outcome is done as a one-sample Z test of proportions. That is, the QMG is a continuous outcome, but analyses results are reported as proportions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MG QOL-15) ScoresChange from Baseline to Week 12MG Quality of Life (QOL)-15: Composite measure of scores from measurement scales. The MG QOL-15 is a questionnaire answered by the patient that asked about different symptoms of MG. The questionnaire consists of 15 questions that are graded on a scale of 0 - 4. The total score has a range of 0 - 60 with a higher score meaning more severe symptoms or a worse outcome.
Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) ScoreChange from Baseline to Week 12The MGC takes scores from the MG-ADL, the QMG, and combines them will manual muscle testing scores to create the MGC. The scale of this score ranges from 0 - 50 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome or more sever symptoms.
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Convenience ScoreChange from Baseline to Week 12Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Convenience Score measured on a scale of 0 to 100. 0 indicates no treatment convenience satisfaction and 100 indicates highest treatment convenience satisfaction.
Myasthenia Gravis-specific Activities of Daily Living Scale (MG-ADL) ScoresChange from Baseline to Week 12Myasthenia Gravis-specific Activities of Daily Living scale (MG-ADL): Composite measure of scores from measurement scales. The MG-ADL has a scale of 0 - 24 with 0 being the lowest (no symptoms) and 24 being the highest (most severe symptoms. The MG-ADL is a staff-administered, patient-reported questionnaire that measures 8 commons symptoms of myasthenia gravis and grades them on a scale of 0 - 3.
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Satisfaction ScoreChange from Baseline to Week 12Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Satisfaction Score measured on a scale of 0 to 100. 0 indicates no treatment satisfaction and 100 indicates highest treatment satisfaction.
Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Antibody LevelsChange from Week -10 to Week 0 versus Week 1 to Week 12Measure IgG level (mg/dL) between intravenous and subcutaneous study phases. Normal range equals 762-1488 mg/dL.
Tolerabililty12 weeks from start of SCIgTolerability is assessed as the number of subjects who completed the study and/or did not withdraw due to worsening.
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Effectiveness ScoreChange from Baseline to Week 12Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Effectiveness Score measured on a scale of 0 to 100. 0 indicates no treatment effectiveness satisfaction and 100 indicates highest treatment effectiveness satisfaction.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

North American study involving 5 sites (4 in the US and 1 in Canada). Subjects were recruited through clinical practice and advertisement through the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hizentra
Hizentra is a subcutaneous (under the skin) immunoglobin (SCIg). Participants will receive weekly Hizentra. Dose and rate depend on the visit and how each participant tolerates the drug. Max flow rate not to exceed 100 mL per hour. HIZENTRA ®
23
Total23

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDid not pass screening phase1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHizentra
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
16 Participants
Age, Continuous51.36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.001
Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis test at Baseline10 points
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
African American
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Unknown
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
18 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
11 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 23
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Patients Whose Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Scores Are Increased by no More Than 3 Points at the End of the SCIg Treatment Phase

The QMG is a 13 item ordinal scale which measures ocular, bulbar, extremity fatigue and strength, along with respiratory function. The scale is from 0 - 3 for each item, with 0 meaning normal and 3 is severe. Total score can range from 0 to 39. Change in MG severity will be measured using the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score for Disease severity. The QMG is a validated clinical composite scale. As mentioned in the protocol, our hypotheses are: H0: Proportion of patients whose QMG scores are increased by more than 3 points at the end of the SCIg treatment phase ≤ 0.65 HA: Proportion of patients whose QMG scores are increased by no more than 3 points at the end of the SCIg treatment phase \> 0.65 Thus, analysis of the primary outcome is done as a one-sample Z test of proportions. That is, the QMG is a continuous outcome, but analyses results are reported as proportions.

Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 12

Population: 23 patients were enrolled in the study. The protocol mentions that only those subjects who have stable QMG in the screening phase will be considered eligible for analyses. In our case 22 out of 23 patients are eligible for the final analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HizentraProportion of Patients Whose Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Scores Are Increased by no More Than 3 Points at the End of the SCIg Treatment Phase0.864 proportion of participants
Comparison: Sample size/power calculations are mentioned in the study protocol.~The study hypotheses are as follows:~H0: Proportion of patients whose QMG scores are increased by no more than 3 points at the end of the SCIg treatment phase ≤ 0.65 HA: Proportion of patients whose QMG scores are increased by no more than 3 points at the end of the SCIg treatment phase \> 0.65p-value: 0.017995% CI: [0.72, 1]One sample Z test of proportions
Secondary

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Antibody Levels

Measure IgG level (mg/dL) between intravenous and subcutaneous study phases. Normal range equals 762-1488 mg/dL.

Time frame: Change from Week -10 to Week 0 versus Week 1 to Week 12

Population: Note: Change in IgG from Week -10 to Week 0 can be assessed for 20 participants. Change in IgG from Week 1 to Week 12 can be assessed for 19 participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
HizentraImmunoglobulin G (IgG) Antibody LevelsChange: Week -10 to Week 0661 mg/dL
HizentraImmunoglobulin G (IgG) Antibody LevelsChange: Week 1 to Week 12-54 mg/dL
p-value: 0.0028Wilcoxon Signed Rank for paired data
Secondary

Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Score

The MGC takes scores from the MG-ADL, the QMG, and combines them will manual muscle testing scores to create the MGC. The scale of this score ranges from 0 - 50 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome or more sever symptoms.

Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 12

Population: Here we consider the 21 participants on whom the MG-Composite scores are available for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
HizentraMyasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) ScoreWeek 124 score on a scale
HizentraMyasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) ScoreBaseline6 score on a scale
p-value: 0.047Wilcoxon Signed Rank for paired data
Secondary

Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MG QOL-15) Scores

MG Quality of Life (QOL)-15: Composite measure of scores from measurement scales. The MG QOL-15 is a questionnaire answered by the patient that asked about different symptoms of MG. The questionnaire consists of 15 questions that are graded on a scale of 0 - 4. The total score has a range of 0 - 60 with a higher score meaning more severe symptoms or a worse outcome.

Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 12

Population: Here we consider the 22 participants on whom the MG-ADL scores at either baseline or Week 12 are available for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
HizentraMyasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MG QOL-15) ScoresWeek 1216 score on a scale
HizentraMyasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MG QOL-15) ScoresBaseline22 score on a scale
p-value: 0.612Wilcoxon Signed Rank for paired data
Secondary

Myasthenia Gravis-specific Activities of Daily Living Scale (MG-ADL) Scores

Myasthenia Gravis-specific Activities of Daily Living scale (MG-ADL): Composite measure of scores from measurement scales. The MG-ADL has a scale of 0 - 24 with 0 being the lowest (no symptoms) and 24 being the highest (most severe symptoms. The MG-ADL is a staff-administered, patient-reported questionnaire that measures 8 commons symptoms of myasthenia gravis and grades them on a scale of 0 - 3.

Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 12

Population: Here we consider the 22 participants on whom the MG-ADL scores at either baseline or Week 12 are available for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
HizentraMyasthenia Gravis-specific Activities of Daily Living Scale (MG-ADL) ScoresWeek 123 score on a scale
HizentraMyasthenia Gravis-specific Activities of Daily Living Scale (MG-ADL) ScoresBaseline3 score on a scale
p-value: 0.113Wilcoxon Signed Rank for paired data
Secondary

Tolerabililty

Tolerability is assessed as the number of subjects who completed the study and/or did not withdraw due to worsening.

Time frame: 12 weeks from start of SCIg

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HizentraTolerabililty20 Participants
Secondary

Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Convenience Score

Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Convenience Score measured on a scale of 0 to 100. 0 indicates no treatment convenience satisfaction and 100 indicates highest treatment convenience satisfaction.

Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 12

Population: This secondary outcome was recorded for 18 patients. Analysis is done as per the protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
HizentraTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Convenience ScoreWeek 1275 score on a scale
HizentraTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Convenience ScoreBaseline69.40 score on a scale
p-value: 0.901Wilcoxon Signed Rank for paired data
Secondary

Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Effectiveness Score

Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Effectiveness Score measured on a scale of 0 to 100. 0 indicates no treatment effectiveness satisfaction and 100 indicates highest treatment effectiveness satisfaction.

Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 12

Population: This secondary outcome was recorded for 20 patients. Analysis is done as per the protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
HizentraTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Effectiveness ScoreWeek 1279.20 score on a scale
HizentraTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Effectiveness ScoreBaseline75 score on a scale
p-value: 0.51Wilcoxon Signed Rank for paired data
Secondary

Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Satisfaction Score

Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Satisfaction Score measured on a scale of 0 to 100. 0 indicates no treatment satisfaction and 100 indicates highest treatment satisfaction.

Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 12

Population: This secondary outcome was recorded for 18 patients. Analysis is done as per the protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
HizentraTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Satisfaction ScoreWeek 1283.30 score on a scale
HizentraTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) - Satisfaction ScoreBaseline75 score on a scale
p-value: 0.289Wilcoxon Signed Rank for paired data

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026