Skip to content

Safety Study of AEM-28 to Treat Refractory Hypercholesterolemia

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Single and Multiple Ascending Doses of AEM-28 in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Refractory Hypercholesterolemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02100839
Enrollment
52
Registered
2014-04-01
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2015-12-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolemia, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II

Keywords

hypercholesterolemia, apolipoprotein E, First in Human, Apolipoprotein E (ApoE), Apolipoprotein E Mimetic (AEM)

Brief summary

The purpose of the first part of this study is to determine the safety and tolerability of a single dose of AEM-28, an apolipoprotein E mimetic, in subjects with high total cholesterol who are otherwise healthy subjects. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of AEM-28 will also be evaluated. The second part of this study will be a multiple ascending dose evaluation of AEM-28 in patients with refractory hypercholesterolemia. AEM-28 has demonstrated significant lipid lowering activity and positive effects on the artery wall. AEM-28 is being developed for the treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

Interventions

DRUGAEM-28

Solution for injection

DRUGNormal Saline

0.9% saline for injection

Sponsors

LipimetiX Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Single Ascending Dose (SAD) Study: * Male or female non-smoker, ≥18 and ≤55 years of age, with BMI \>18.5 and \< 32.0 kg/m² * Total cholesterol greater or equal to 5.0 mmol/L (≥194 mg/dL) at screening Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) Study: * Male or female non-smoker, ≥18 and ≤75 years of age, with BMI \>18.5 and \< 35.0 kg/m² * Diagnosis of refractory hypercholesterolemia with LDL cholesterol levels \> 2.5 mmol/L (97 mg/mL) at screening. * On stable lipid lowering therapy for ≥ 8 weeks * On stable diet for ≥ 12 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

SAD Study: * Any clinically significant abnormality or abnormal laboratory test results found during medical screening or positive test for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or HIV found during medical screening. * History of allergic reactions to diphenhydramine, ranitidine, methylprednisone or other related drugs, or history of significant allergic or hypersensitivity reaction (e.g. angioedema) to any substance. MAD Study: * Significant health problems within 6 months prior to screening, which in the opinion of the Medical Sub-Investigator would prevent the subject from participating in the study, including but not limited to: unstable coronary heart disease; transient ischemic attack; stroke; revascularization procedure; uncontrolled hyperthyroidism; coagulation disorder; peptic ulcers or GI bleeding; significant disease of the central nervous system; liver or renal disease. * History of allergic reactions to diphenhydramine, ranitidine, methylprednisone or other related drugs, or history of significant allergic or hypersensitivity reaction (e.g. angioedema) to any substance.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Incurred at Least One Treatment Emergent EventPart A (SAD): Day -1 to Day 15; Part B (MAD): Day 1 to Day 57Safety and tolerability to AEM-28 were evaluated through the assessment of adverse events (i.e., seriousness, severity, relationship to the study medication, outcome, duration, and management), vital signs, 12-lead ECG, telemetry, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examination, and local response to each injection, and body weight (Part B only). Treatment-emergent adverse events were tabulated by treatment. Changes from baseline values in vital signs, ECG, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examination, and body weight (Part B only) were evaluated. Safety and tolerability data were reported using descriptive statistics.
Number of Participants Who Incurred Mild Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsPart A (SAD): Day -1 to Day 15; Part B (MAD): Day 1 to Day 57Safety and tolerability to AEM-28 were evaluated through the assessment of adverse events (i.e., seriousness, severity, relationship to the study medication, outcome, duration, and management), vital signs, 12-lead ECG, telemetry, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examination, and local response to each injection, and body weight (Part B only). Treatment-emergent adverse events were tabulated by treatment. Changes from baseline values in vital signs, ECG, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examination, and body weight (Part B only) were evaluated. Safety and tolerability data were reported using descriptive statistics.
Number of Participants Who Incurred Moderate Treatment Emergent EventsPart A (SAD): Day -1 to Day 15; Part B (MAD): Day 1 to Day 57Safety and tolerability to AEM-28 were evaluated through the assessment of adverse events (i.e., seriousness, severity, relationship to the study medication, outcome, duration, and management), vital signs, 12-lead ECG, telemetry, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examination, and local response to each injection, and body weight (Part B only). Treatment-emergent adverse events were tabulated by treatment. Changes from baseline values in vital signs, ECG, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examination, and body weight (Part B only) were evaluated. Safety and tolerability data were reported using descriptive statistics.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) Percent ChangePart A (SAD): Day 1 to Day 15; Part B (MAD): Day 1 to Day 57Maximum observed percentage change in VLDL-C level relative to baseline for all time points measured in Parts A or Part B with highest dose, i.e. 3.54 mg/kg.

Countries

Australia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study conducted at Linear Clinical Research Ltd, a medical clinic in Nedlands WA Australia.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AEM-28
Single Ascending Dose: Single IV dose for each cohort; dose range 0.032 mg/mL to 3.54 mg/mL Multiple Ascending Dose: Three (3) IV doses for each cohort, one (1) dose every two (2) weeks; dose range 1 mg/kg to 3.54 mg/kg. AEM-28: Solution for injection
37
Normal Saline
Single Ascending Dose: Single IV dose for each cohort. Multiple Ascending Dose: Three (3) IV doses for each cohort, one (1) dose every two (2) weeks. Normal Saline: 0.9% saline for injection
15
Total52

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Multiple Ascending DoseAdverse Event20
Multiple Ascending DoseWithdrawal by Subject20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAEM-28Normal SalineTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
35 Participants15 Participants50 Participants
Age, Continuous35.7 years32 years34.6 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
33 Participants15 Participants48 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
31 Participants11 Participants42 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
37 participants15 participants52 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants10 Participants40 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
33 / 3710 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 370 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Incurred at Least One Treatment Emergent Event

Safety and tolerability to AEM-28 were evaluated through the assessment of adverse events (i.e., seriousness, severity, relationship to the study medication, outcome, duration, and management), vital signs, 12-lead ECG, telemetry, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examination, and local response to each injection, and body weight (Part B only). Treatment-emergent adverse events were tabulated by treatment. Changes from baseline values in vital signs, ECG, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examination, and body weight (Part B only) were evaluated. Safety and tolerability data were reported using descriptive statistics.

Time frame: Part A (SAD): Day -1 to Day 15; Part B (MAD): Day 1 to Day 57

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AEM-28Number of Participants Who Incurred at Least One Treatment Emergent Event33 participants
Normal SalineNumber of Participants Who Incurred at Least One Treatment Emergent Event10 participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Incurred Mild Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Safety and tolerability to AEM-28 were evaluated through the assessment of adverse events (i.e., seriousness, severity, relationship to the study medication, outcome, duration, and management), vital signs, 12-lead ECG, telemetry, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examination, and local response to each injection, and body weight (Part B only). Treatment-emergent adverse events were tabulated by treatment. Changes from baseline values in vital signs, ECG, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examination, and body weight (Part B only) were evaluated. Safety and tolerability data were reported using descriptive statistics.

Time frame: Part A (SAD): Day -1 to Day 15; Part B (MAD): Day 1 to Day 57

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AEM-28Number of Participants Who Incurred Mild Treatment Emergent Adverse Events33 Number of Participants
Normal SalineNumber of Participants Who Incurred Mild Treatment Emergent Adverse Events10 Number of Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Incurred Moderate Treatment Emergent Events

Safety and tolerability to AEM-28 were evaluated through the assessment of adverse events (i.e., seriousness, severity, relationship to the study medication, outcome, duration, and management), vital signs, 12-lead ECG, telemetry, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examination, and local response to each injection, and body weight (Part B only). Treatment-emergent adverse events were tabulated by treatment. Changes from baseline values in vital signs, ECG, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examination, and body weight (Part B only) were evaluated. Safety and tolerability data were reported using descriptive statistics.

Time frame: Part A (SAD): Day -1 to Day 15; Part B (MAD): Day 1 to Day 57

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AEM-28Number of Participants Who Incurred Moderate Treatment Emergent Events7 Number of Participants
Normal SalineNumber of Participants Who Incurred Moderate Treatment Emergent Events0 Number of Participants
Secondary

Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) Percent Change

Maximum observed percentage change in VLDL-C level relative to baseline for all time points measured in Parts A or Part B with highest dose, i.e. 3.54 mg/kg.

Time frame: Part A (SAD): Day 1 to Day 15; Part B (MAD): Day 1 to Day 57

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AEM-28Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) Percent ChangePart A: 3.54 mg/kg-72.1 Max % Change Versus BaselineStandard Deviation 15.1
AEM-28Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) Percent ChangePart B: 3.54 mg/kg-79.2 Max % Change Versus BaselineStandard Deviation 13.5
AEM-28Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) Percent ChangePart A: 2.0 mg/kg-76.3 Max % Change Versus BaselineStandard Deviation 7.25
AEM-28Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) Percent ChangePart B: 2.0 mg/kg-73.3 Max % Change Versus BaselineStandard Deviation 6.36
AEM-28Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) Percent ChangePart A: 1.0 mg/kg-47.9 Max % Change Versus BaselineStandard Deviation 19.7
AEM-28Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) Percent ChangePart B: 1.0 mg/kg-51.8 Max % Change Versus BaselineStandard Deviation 24.7
Normal SalineVery Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) Percent ChangePart A: 1.0 mg/kg-0.23 Max % Change Versus BaselineStandard Deviation 0.15
Normal SalineVery Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) Percent ChangePart A: 3.54 mg/kg-0.33 Max % Change Versus BaselineStandard Deviation 0.17
Normal SalineVery Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) Percent ChangePart B: 2.0 mg/kg-0.52 Max % Change Versus BaselineStandard Deviation 0.15
Normal SalineVery Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) Percent ChangePart B: 3.54 mg/kg-0.58 Max % Change Versus BaselineStandard Deviation 0.31
Normal SalineVery Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) Percent ChangePart B: 1.0 mg/kg-0.38 Max % Change Versus BaselineStandard Deviation 0.19
Normal SalineVery Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) Percent ChangePart A: 2.0 mg/kg-0.35 Max % Change Versus BaselineStandard Deviation 0.13

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026