Skip to content

A Trial Comparing Sequential Addition of Insulin Aspart Versus Further Dose Increase With Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Previously Treated With Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide and Metformin and in Need of Further Intensification

A Trial Comparing Sequential Addition of Insulin Aspart Versus Further Dose Increase With Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Previously Treated With Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide and Metformin and in Need of Further Intensification (DUAL™ - Intensification)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02100475
Acronym
DUAL™
Enrollment
31
Registered
2014-04-01
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2017-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

This trial is conducted globally. The aim of the trial is to compare sequential addition of insulin aspart versus further dose increase with insulin degludec/liraglutide in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus, previously treated with insulin degludec/liraglutide and metformin and in need of further intensification. This is an extension to trial NN9068-3952, NCT01952145 (DUAL™ V).

Interventions

DRUGinsulin degludec/liraglutide

Insulin degludec/liraglutide will be given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. Dose individually adjusted.

DRUGinsulin aspart

Dose titration of insulin aspart will be based on the respective pre-meal(s) and bedtime SMPG measured daily.

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Completion (Visit 28) of NN9068-3952 with insulin degludec/liraglutide + metformin * HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) above or equal to 7 percent at Visit 27 of NN9068-3952 trial

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically significant diseases of the major organ systems * Screening calcitonin above or equal to 50 ng/L

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)Week 0, week 26Change from baseline in HbA1c after 26 weeks of treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Body WeightWeek 0, week 26Change from baseline in body weight after 26 weeks of treatment.
Number of Treatment-emergent Confirmed Hypoglycaemic EpisodesWeek 0 - 26Treatment-emergent hypoglycaemic episodes: if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of investigational medicinal product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on investigational medicinal product. Confirmed hypoglycaemia: subject unable to treat himself/herself and/or have a recorded plasma glucose \< 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL).

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Greece, Hungary, Mexico, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial was conducted at 19 sites in 8 countries as follows: Argentina: 2 sites; Greece: 2 sites, Hungary: 1 site; Russian Federation: 5 sites; Slovakia: 4 sites, South Africa: 1 site; Spain: 1 site, United States: 3 sites.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were inadequately controlled (HbA1c level ≥ 7% \[53 mmol/mol\]) on treatment with IDegLira and metformin after 26 weeks of treatment in the NN9068-3952 trial were screened. Eligible subjects were randomised in a 1:1 manner to one of the two parallel treatment groups (IDegLira or IDegLira + IAsp).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
IDegLira
Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. Intensification with IDegLira was performed by dose optimisation up to a maximum of 80 dose steps (80 units IDeg/2.9 mg Lira). All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
16
IDegLira + IAsp
IDegLira was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. IDegLira was titrated up to a maximum dose of 50 dose steps (50 units IDeg/1.8 mg Lira) with sequential add-on of bolus insulin aspart (IAsp). Dose titration of insulin aspart was based on the respective premeal(s) and bedtime self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) measured daily. All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
15
Total31

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyUnclassified12
Overall StudyWithdrawal criteria10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIDegLiraIDegLira + IAspTotal
Age, Continuous57.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
57.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
57.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
Gender
Female
9 Participants8 Participants17 Participants
Gender
Male
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
HbA1c7.6 Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
7.7 Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
7.6 Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 163 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 162 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)

Change from baseline in HbA1c after 26 weeks of treatment.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects (31 subjects). Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IDegLiraChange From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)-0.43 Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.94
IDegLira + IAspChange From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)-0.14 Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.09
Comparison: The response and change from baseline in the response after 26 weeks of treatment was analysed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) method with treatment and baseline IDegLira dose strata as fixed factors and baseline response as a covariate. Missing data were imputed using LOCF.p-value: 0.42795% CI: [-1.05, 0.46]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Weight

Change from baseline in body weight after 26 weeks of treatment.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26

Population: FAS included all randomised subject (31 subjects). Missing data were imputed using the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IDegLiraChange From Baseline in Body Weight0.9 KilogramsStandard Deviation 2.1
IDegLira + IAspChange From Baseline in Body Weight1.5 KilogramsStandard Deviation 3.2
Secondary

Number of Treatment-emergent Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Treatment-emergent hypoglycaemic episodes: if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of investigational medicinal product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on investigational medicinal product. Confirmed hypoglycaemia: subject unable to treat himself/herself and/or have a recorded plasma glucose \< 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL).

Time frame: Week 0 - 26

Population: Safety analysis set (SAS) included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator (31 subjects). Confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were reported by 2 subjects in IDegLira arm and 2 subjects in IDegLira + IAsp arm.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IDegLiraNumber of Treatment-emergent Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes34 Number of episodes
IDegLira + IAspNumber of Treatment-emergent Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes4 Number of episodes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026