Skip to content

The Role of Auditory Feedback in Guiding Upper Extremity Movements

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02100306
Enrollment
26
Registered
2014-03-31
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2014-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

Stroke is one of the leading causes of disability, with an estimated prevalence of 50,000 cases per year in Canada. Less than half of stroke patients regain use of their arm and hand. There is currently no intervention regime that is the gold standard, despite the variety of therapeutic techniques used to treat the upper extremity post-stroke. The use of external feedback to improve motor learning is a technique that has been less studied but shows promise. Therefore, the purpose of this proof of principle study it to test whether different auditory feedback frequencies can facilitate reaching ability in people with stroke. In addition brain scans will be collected that will enable us to determine how stroke severity may impact on one's ability to improve with this technique. We hypothesize that patients who receive less feedback (50% alternate) will have enhanced learning relative to the patients who receive more feedback (100%).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAuditory Feedback 100%

Patients will receive constant auditory feedback across training trials.

BEHAVIORALAuditory Feedback 50% alternate

Patients will receive alternating auditory feedback (1 trial auditory feedback; 1 trial no auditory feedback) across trials

Sponsors

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Unilateral first time MCA ischemic stroke * Stroke patients should have some movement of shoulder/elbow (no movement of hand - e.g. hand, fingers - is OK) * \> 2 months post * between 30-85 years

Exclusion criteria

* prior stroke * severe comprehension (or cognitive) deficit that compromises informed consent or understanding of instructions * contraindications to MRI (e.g. claustrophobia, metal implants) * neurodegenerative or psychiatric disease * apraxia * auditory deficits that would impair testing * prior musculoskeletal injury to back or upper extremity (including shoulder subluxation from stroke) * skin conditions that would preclude taping of goniometers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in movement error from baselineparticipants will be followed for the duration of the study, an expected 3 hours per day for 2 weeks (5 days per week/10 days total)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in range of motionparticipants will be followed for the duration of the study, an expected 3 hours per day for 2 weeks (5 days per week/10 days total)
Change in movement durationparticipants will be followed for the duration of the study, an expected 3 hours per day for 2 weeks (5 days per week/10 days total)

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactTea Lulic, MSc
tlulic@sri.utoronto.ca416 480-6100

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026