Skip to content

Narrative or Fact-Based Videos in Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screenings in African American Communities

CRC Screening Thoughts and Feelings: Increasing Engagement of African Americans

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02100254
Enrollment
1310
Registered
2014-03-31
Start date
2009-10-01
Completion date
2017-09-23
Last updated
2022-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer, Healthy, no Evidence of Disease

Brief summary

This randomized clinical trial studies narrative or fact-based videos in increasing colorectal cancer screenings in African American communities. Informational videotapes may help increase the number of participants who engage in colonoscopy screenings. It is not yet known whether narrative videos may be more effective than fact-based videos in increasing colorectal cancer screenings.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Assess both individual and environmental factors that guide decisions and behaviors to engage or not engage in colonoscopy screenings for African Americans in the two communities. II. Using a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach, develop and pilot a peer-led, narrative-based colorectal cancer behavioral intervention for increasing colonoscopy screening behaviors in African Americans. III. Examine the efficacy of a narrative communication-style group intervention compared to a didactic intervention to influence African Americans' engagement in colorectal cancer screening, including examining the degree to which the community interventions impact cognitive and affective decision making factors about health care seeking. IV. Examine and explore contextual factors that may influence the process of behavior change to better understand colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and health care seeking behaviors. OUTLINE: Program locations are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Participants view videos with information about CRC and screening delivered by personal narrative. ARM II: Participants view videos with information about CRC and screening delivered by informative fact-based message. After completion of study, patients are followed up at 3 and 6 months.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALbehavioral intervention

View personal narrative informational video

Sponsors

Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants in each component (focus groups, surveys and educational programs) will be 18 years of age and over; these men and women are generally healthy, ambulatory and able to participate in events in their community; no women, men, or children of any ethnic or social background will be excluded from the educational program * EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTION: * Currently non-adherent to colorectal cancer screening * Self-identify as African American * Are 50 years of age or older * Have the ability to provide informed consent in English * FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENTS: * Must be non-adherent for CRC screening at the time of the educational program * Have telephone service (mobile or landline), to participate in the follow up interviews * Agree to providing consent for release/review of their medical record

Exclusion criteria

* Non-English speaking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in likelihood of CRC screening in previously unscreened subjectsBaseline to 6 months post-presentationA change score (post-presentation minus pre-presentation) will be created and summarized. In addition, the change score will be further dichotomized (e.g. increase versus no increase in the likelihood of screening) and the percent of those who experienced an increased likelihood, denoted by pi, will be computed. A corresponding 95% confidence interval will be calculated. To test for differences in variables collected pre- and post-presentation, generalized mixed linear models will be used. Testing will be done at the 0.0.5 nominal significance level and using the approximate t-test method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of positive cognitive responses to CRC screening per Cognitively-Based Perceived Risk surveyPost-presentation up to 6 monthsAn LMM will be employed and implemented in the SAS program MIXED.
Number of participants who had or scheduled colonoscopyUp to 6 monthsA generalized linear model with a logit link function will be used.
Number of negative affective responses to CRC screening per Affective Associations and Affectively-Based Risk surveysPost-presentation up to 6 monthsA linear mixed model (LMM) will be employed and implemented in the SAS program MIXED.
Number of participants who discussed CRC screening with their primary care physicianUp to 6 monthsA generalized linear model with a logit link function will be used.
Influential factors in behavior changes, assessed using qualitative analyses of text from participant interviews, including affective associations with the program, participants' cognitive-affective influences, and predisposing influencesBaseline to 1 week post-presentation & 6-monthsQualitative text from a text analysis program will be funneled into categories using the PEN-3 and analyzed according to the categories' role and influence. Findings will be examined in comparison to quantitative data regarding the content of the intervention.
Number of participants who performed the fecal occult blood test (FOBT)/fecal immunohistochemistry test (FIT)Up to 6 monthsA generalized linear model with a logit link function will be used.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026