Skip to content

Effectiveness Analysis of Active Stretching Versus Active Stretching With Low Frequency Currents

Effectiveness Analysis of Active Stretching Versus Active Stretching With Low Frequency Currents

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02100241
Enrollment
62
Registered
2014-03-31
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2014-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Muscular Diseases

Keywords

Young adult, Muscle Stretching Exercises, Range of Motion, Articular

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether active stretching with low frequency currents are more effective than active stretching in the treatment of hamstring shortness syndrome in children.

Detailed description

In 2012 we studied 51 young footballers with Short Hamstring Syndrome in Spain. Three groups were formed: 1. Stretching+Transcutaneous Electrical Nervous Stimulation (TENS); 2. Active stretching; 3. Conventional stretching. Parameters: straight leg raise test (SLR), popliteal angle with the passive knee extension test (PKE) and the toe-touch test (TT). The inter-group means were compared and clinically relevant parameters calculated \[relative risk (RR), absolute risk reduction (ARR), relative risk reduction (RRR) and number needed to treat (NNT)\].

Interventions

The participants performed three specific exercises of static active stretching of the hamstring muscles, maintaining the maximum tightness that was tolerable without pain for 15 seconds. Each exercise were performed twice, with a total of six repetitions.

Sponsors

Rodríguez, Francisco Piqueras, M.D.
Lead SponsorINDIV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
10 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* children between 10 to 16. * children federated belonging to Football School of Jumilla. * children whose result in the assessment of range of motion is less than 70º in the Straight Leg Raising Test. * not afraid to present the application of electrotherapy. * not have low back pain in last three months. * not to be injured

Exclusion criteria

* children who have acute muscle injury or ligamentous. * children with recent fractures or unconsolidated. * children with ligamentous laxity. * functional shortening suffering children

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Range of motiona week

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026