Skip to content

Quantifying the Influence of Expert Modeling

Quantifying the Influence of Expert Modeling on Novice Nurse Competence and Self-Efficacy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02100215
Enrollment
20
Registered
2014-03-31
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2019-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Competence, Self-efficacy

Keywords

simulation, competence, self-efficacy, novice nurses

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to learn more about the effects of various types of simulation preparation methods on novice nurses' competence and self-efficacy. Participants will be recruited from an academic course (N424 Integrated Practicum). Participants will be randomized to three intervention groups (i.e. expert modeling video, voice over PowerPoint, and traditional readings). All participants will complete self-efficacy surveys and two simulations. During simulation, participants will be scored based on their competence according to a performance rubric. The hypothesis is that participants in the expert modeling group will demonstrate more change in competence and report more change in self-efficacy scores than participants in other groups.

Detailed description

Investigators will compare self-confidence and competence scores between the three groups after the pre-test and posttest simulations. The self-efficacy survey is an 7-item scale that involves participants rating their self-efficacy about providing care for multiple patients. Participants rate their self-efficacy on a 1 to 5 (not confident to very confident scale). The survey takes 5 minutes to complete. The self-efficacy survey has been used in many simulation research studies previously with novice nurses. Competence will be measured with a rater-observation measure which has previously been used in simulation research.

Interventions

OTHERCommon readings and educational handouts

Participants in all groups have common readings related to policies for nursing care in acute care facilities. There will be additional handouts related to performing safety checks and a focused physical assessment.

OTHERExpert Modeling

70 minutes of expert modeling videos

OTHERVoice Over Power Point

60 minutes of Voice Over PowerPoint presentations

Sponsors

Oregon Health and Science University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Enrolled in capstone clinical course * Oregon Consortium for Nursing Education curriculum * Ashland, OR

Exclusion criteria

* No

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Creighton Simulation Evaluation InstrumentChange from baseline on Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument at 5 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
National League for Nursing Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence with Learning scaleChange from baseline on NLN Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence with Learning scale at 5 weeks

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026