Skip to content

Effectiveness and Safety of Adding Compound Preparation of Pioglitazone and Metformin for Type 2 Diabetic Patients

The Randomized Multiple Center Trial for The Effectiveness and Safety of Adding Compound Preparation of Pioglitazone and Metformin for Type 2 Diabetic Patients Who Have Bad Glycemic Control With the Initial Treatment of Sulfonylureas

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02099838
Enrollment
98
Registered
2014-03-31
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2014-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

Pioglitazone, Metformin, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Brief summary

Secondary failure of sulfonylureas (SUs) can occur in about 30%-40% of type 2 diabetic patients after treatment with SUs for 5 years, although SUs are widely used in type 2 diabetic patients. This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adding compound preparation of pioglitazone and metformin for type 2 diabetic patients who have bad glycemic control with the initial treatment of SUs.

Detailed description

Design of this clinical trial was multicenter, randomized, double-blind and placebo parallel controlled. Type 2 diabetic patients having bad glycemic control with the initial treatment of SUs were included. They were randomly divided into experiment group and control group, respectively taking compound preparation of pioglitazone and metformin (2mg/500mg) and placebo with identical shape immediately before a meal twice a day. Course of the treatment was 12 weeks.

Interventions

taking 1 tablet twice a day (before breakfast and before dinner) orally for 12 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

taking 1 tablet twice a day (before breakfast and before dinner) orally for 12 weeks

Sponsors

Wuhan Iron and Steel Workers' Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Wuhan Pu-Ai Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Hubei Xinhua Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Type 2 diabetic patients (WHO criterion, 1999) * 19kg/m2 ≤ BMI ≤ 35kg/m2 * Subject with the initial treatment of SUs on the basis of controlling diet and sport; treatment lasting for no less than 3 months and stable dose for at least 1 month; HbA1c 7-11% * No insulin therapy during 6 months before being selected * Not involved in any drug test during 3 months before being selected * No serious heart, liver or kidney diseases * Must have effective contraception methods for women of child-bearing age * Willing to being informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Type 1 diabetes or other specific types of diabetes * Pregnancy, preparation for pregnancy, lactation and women of child-bearing age incapable of effective contraception methods * Uncooperative subject because of various reasons * Abnormal liver function, glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (ALT) and glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (AST) \> twice the upper limits of normal * Impairment of renal function, serum creatinine: ≥ 133mmol/L for female,≥ 135mmol/L for male * Serious chronic gastrointestinal diseases * Edema * Serious heart diseases, such as cardiac insufficiency (level III or more according to NYHA), acute coronary syndrome and old myocardial infraction * Blood pressure: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 180mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 110mmHg * White blood count (WBC) \< 4.0×109/L or platelet count (PLT) \< 90×109/L,or definite anemia (Hb:\< 120g/L for male, \< 110g/L for female), or other hematological diseases * Endocrine system diseases, such as hyperthyroidism and hypercortisolism * Experimental drug allergy or frequent hypoglycemia * Psychiatric disorders, drug or other substance abuse * Diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar nonketotic coma requiring insulin therapy * Stressful situations such as surgery, serious trauma and so on * Chronic hypoxic diseases such as pulmonary emphysema and pulmonary heart disease * Combined use of drugs effecting glucose metabolism such as glucocorticoid * Tumor, especially bladder tumor and/or family history of bladder tumor and/or long-term hematuria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of HbA1c From Baseline at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Measuring venous level of HbA1c at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then using the natural logarithm of HbA1c to analyze the change in HbA1c from baseline at week 12 and compare that between experiment group and control group, since the HbA1c wasn't normal distribution and was logarithmic normal distribution. Change = ln(Baseline Level) - ln(Week 12 Level).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of Fasting Insulin From Baseline at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Measuring venous level of fasting insulin at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then using the natural logarithm of fasting insulin to analyze the change in fasting insulin from baseline at week 12 and compare that between experiment group and control group, since the fasting insulin wasn't normal distribution and was logarithmic normal distribution. Change = ln(Baseline Level) - ln(Week 12 Level).
Change of TC From Baseline at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Measuring venous level of TC(Total Cholesterol) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in TC from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level).
Change of TG From Baseline at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Measuring venous level of TG(Triglyceride) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in TG from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level).
Change of HDL From Baseline at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Measuring venous level of HDL(High-Density Lipoprotein) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in HDL from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level).
Change of LDL From Baseline at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Measuring venous level of LDL(Low-Density Lipoprotein) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then using the natural logarithm of LDL to analyze the change in LDL from baseline at week 12 and compare that between experiment group and control group, since the LDL wasn't normal distribution and was logarithmic normal distribution. Change = ln(Baseline Level) - ln(Week 12 Level).
Change of FPG From Baseline at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Measuring venous level of FPG(fasting plasma glucose) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then using the natural logarithm of FPG to analyze the change in FPG from baseline at week 12 and compare that between experiment group and control group, since the FPG wasn't normal distribution and was logarithmic normal distribution. Change = ln(Baseline Level) - ln(Week 12 Level).
Change of 2hPPG From Baseline at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Measuring venous level of 2hPPG(2-hour postprandial glucose) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in 2hPPG from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level).
Change of 2-hour Postprandial Insulin From Baseline at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Measuring venous level of 2-hour postprandial insulin at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then using the natural logarithm of 2-hour postprandial insulin to analyze the change in 2-hour postprandial insulin from baseline at week 12 and compare that between experiment group and control group, since the 2-hour postprandial insulin wasn't normal distribution and was logarithmic normal distribution. Change = ln(Baseline Level) - ln(Week 12 Level).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of TBil From Baseline at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Measuring venous level of TBil(total bilirubin) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in TBil from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level).
Change of DBil From Baseline at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Measuring venous level of DBil(direct bilirubin) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in DBil from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level).
Change of ALT From Baseline at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Measuring venous level of ALT at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in ALT from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level).
Change of AST From Baseline at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Measuring venous level of AST at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in AST from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level).

Countries

China

Participant flow

Recruitment details

98 participants were recruited at 15 hospitals in Wuhan between March 2012 and September 2013.

Pre-assignment details

All participants were randomized to the two groups.They had a week for washout before the trial, during which they received diet and sport instructions, kept the sulfonylureas (SUs) unchanged and didn't use any drugs affecting blood glucose.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pioglitazone and Metformin
Type 2 diabetic patients only took SUs previously. During a week for washout before the trial, they received diet and sport instructions, kept the SUs unchanged and didn't use any drugs affecting blood glucose. All participants added 1 tablet of pioglitazone and metformin twice a day (before breakfast and before dinner) orally for 12 weeks.
46
Placebo
Type 2 diabetic patients only took SUs previously. During a week for washout before the trial, they received diet and sport instructions, kept the SUs unchanged and didn't use any drugs affecting blood glucose. All participants added 1 tablet of placebo twice a day (before breakfast and before dinner) orally for 12 weeks.
51
Total97

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up31
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPioglitazone and MetforminTotalPlacebo
2-hour Postprandial Glucose(2hPPG)16.47 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.96
16.02 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.86
15.59 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.81
Age, Continuous54.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.91
54.61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.54
54.51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.23
Diastolic Blood Pressure(DBP)76.24 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.38
76.87 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.86
77.83 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.78
Direct Bilirubin(DBil)3.91 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.79
3.92 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.96
3.92 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.11
Duration of Type 2 Diabetes4.86 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.67
4.64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.63
4.39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.63
Glutamic-oxaloacetic Transaminase(AST)20.47 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.92
21.42 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.43
22.25 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.82
Glutamic-pyruvic Transaminase(ALT)21.98 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.57
23.75 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
25.35 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Height(Female)158.23 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
159.33 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.68
159.88 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.54
Height(Male)169.17 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.03
169.49 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.69
169.92 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.44
High Density Lipoprotein(HDL)1.22 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.25
1.17 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.24
1.13 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.22
ln(2-hour Postprandial Insulin)3.49 ln(mU/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.67
3.49 ln(mU/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.66
3.48 ln(mU/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.65
ln(Fasting Insulin)2.21 ln(mU/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.62
2.19 ln(mU/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
2.17 ln(mU/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.58
ln(Fasting Plasma Glucose(FPG))2.16 ln(mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.23
2.12 ln(mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.21
2.08 ln(mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.18
ln(HbA1c)2.14 ln(percent)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.12
2.12 ln(percent)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.19
2.10 ln(percent)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.14
ln(Low Density Lipoprotein(LDL))0.90 ln(mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.32
0.88 ln(mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.39
0.87 ln(mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.45
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Han
45 participants95 participants50 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other ethnicity
1 participants2 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
China
46 participants97 participants51 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants39 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
33 Participants58 Participants25 Participants
Systolic Blood Pressure(SBP)125.35 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.46
126.86 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.98
128.46 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.38
Total Bilirubin(TBil)15.26 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.87
14.64 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.42
14.09 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
Total Cholesterol(TC)4.76 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.79
4.76 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.92
4.76 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.04
Triglyceride(TG)1.76 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.93
1.74 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.91
1.71 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Weight(Female)64.85 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.49
63.62 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.49
63.00 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.49
Weight(Male)71.18 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.03
72.05 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.39
73.37 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.89

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 465 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 470 / 51

Outcome results

Primary

Change of HbA1c From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of HbA1c at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then using the natural logarithm of HbA1c to analyze the change in HbA1c from baseline at week 12 and compare that between experiment group and control group, since the HbA1c wasn't normal distribution and was logarithmic normal distribution. Change = ln(Baseline Level) - ln(Week 12 Level).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Based on the full analysis set: all participants who were eligible or drop-out, but eliminated participants were excluded. Intention to treat analysis and last observational carried forward(LOCF) imputation method.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of HbA1c From Baseline at Week 12ln(HbA1c) at Baseline2.14 ln(percent)Standard Deviation 0.12
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of HbA1c From Baseline at Week 12ln(HbA1c) at Week 121.95 ln(percent)Standard Deviation 0.12
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of HbA1c From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.19 ln(percent)Standard Deviation 0.14
PlaceboChange of HbA1c From Baseline at Week 12ln(HbA1c) at Baseline2.10 ln(percent)Standard Deviation 0.14
PlaceboChange of HbA1c From Baseline at Week 12ln(HbA1c) at Week 122.02 ln(percent)Standard Deviation 0.17
PlaceboChange of HbA1c From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.07 ln(percent)Standard Deviation 0.21
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of HbA1c between before and after treatment in Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.065Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of HbA1c between before and after treatment in Pioglitazone and Metformin group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of HbA1c between Pioglitazone and Metformin group and Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.0005Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change of 2-hour Postprandial Insulin From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of 2-hour postprandial insulin at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then using the natural logarithm of 2-hour postprandial insulin to analyze the change in 2-hour postprandial insulin from baseline at week 12 and compare that between experiment group and control group, since the 2-hour postprandial insulin wasn't normal distribution and was logarithmic normal distribution. Change = ln(Baseline Level) - ln(Week 12 Level).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Based on the full analysis set: all participants who were eligible or drop-out, but eliminated participants were excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of 2-hour Postprandial Insulin From Baseline at Week 12ln(2-hour Postprandial Insulin) at Baseline3.49 ln(mU/L)Standard Deviation 0.67
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of 2-hour Postprandial Insulin From Baseline at Week 12ln(2-hour Postprandial Insulin) at Week 123.33 ln(mU/L)Standard Deviation 0.75
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of 2-hour Postprandial Insulin From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.19 ln(mU/L)Standard Deviation 0.83
PlaceboChange of 2-hour Postprandial Insulin From Baseline at Week 12ln(2-hour Postprandial Insulin) at Baseline3.48 ln(mU/L)Standard Deviation 0.65
PlaceboChange of 2-hour Postprandial Insulin From Baseline at Week 12ln(2-hour Postprandial Insulin) at Week 123.64 ln(mU/L)Standard Deviation 0.74
PlaceboChange of 2-hour Postprandial Insulin From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12-0.15 ln(mU/L)Standard Deviation 0.77
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of 2-hour postprandial insulin between before and after treatment in Pioglitazone and Metformin group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.1147Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of 2-hour postprandial insulin between before and after treatment in Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.4006Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of 2-hour postprandial insulin between Pioglitazone and Metformin group and Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.0614Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change of 2hPPG From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of 2hPPG(2-hour postprandial glucose) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in 2hPPG from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Based on the full analysis set: all participants who were eligible or drop-out, but eliminated participants were excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of 2hPPG From Baseline at Week 122hPPG at Baseline16.47 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.96
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of 2hPPG From Baseline at Week 122hPPG at Week 1212.68 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.43
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of 2hPPG From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 123.65 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.73
PlaceboChange of 2hPPG From Baseline at Week 122hPPG at Baseline15.59 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.81
PlaceboChange of 2hPPG From Baseline at Week 122hPPG at Week 1215.23 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.8
PlaceboChange of 2hPPG From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.45 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.94
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of 2hPPG between before and after treatment in Pioglitazone and Metformin group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of 2hPPG between before and after treatment in Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.2428Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of 2hPPG between Pioglitazone and Metformin group and Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.0003Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change of Fasting Insulin From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of fasting insulin at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then using the natural logarithm of fasting insulin to analyze the change in fasting insulin from baseline at week 12 and compare that between experiment group and control group, since the fasting insulin wasn't normal distribution and was logarithmic normal distribution. Change = ln(Baseline Level) - ln(Week 12 Level).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Based on the full analysis set: all participants who were eligible or drop-out, but eliminated participants were excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of Fasting Insulin From Baseline at Week 12ln(Fasting Insulin) at Baseline2.21 ln(mU/L)Standard Deviation 0.62
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of Fasting Insulin From Baseline at Week 12ln(Fasting Insulin) at Week 121.90 ln(mU/L)Standard Deviation 0.58
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of Fasting Insulin From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.35 ln(mU/L)Standard Deviation 0.58
PlaceboChange of Fasting Insulin From Baseline at Week 12ln(Fasting Insulin) at Baseline2.17 ln(mU/L)Standard Deviation 0.58
PlaceboChange of Fasting Insulin From Baseline at Week 12ln(Fasting Insulin) at Week 122.26 ln(mU/L)Standard Deviation 0.74
PlaceboChange of Fasting Insulin From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12-0.08 ln(mU/L)Standard Deviation 0.79
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of fasting insulin between before and after treatment in Pioglitazone and Metformin group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of fasting insulin between before and after treatment in Placebo group.. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.7353Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of fasting insulin between Pioglitazone and Metformin group and Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.0013Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change of FPG From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of FPG(fasting plasma glucose) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then using the natural logarithm of FPG to analyze the change in FPG from baseline at week 12 and compare that between experiment group and control group, since the FPG wasn't normal distribution and was logarithmic normal distribution. Change = ln(Baseline Level) - ln(Week 12 Level).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Based on the full analysis set: all participants who were eligible or drop-out, but eliminated participants were excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of FPG From Baseline at Week 12ln(FPG) at Baseline2.16 ln(mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.23
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of FPG From Baseline at Week 12ln(FPG) at Week 121.91 ln(mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.22
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of FPG From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.25 ln(mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.24
PlaceboChange of FPG From Baseline at Week 12ln(FPG) at Baseline2.08 ln(mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.18
PlaceboChange of FPG From Baseline at Week 12ln(FPG) at Week 122.05 ln(mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.29
PlaceboChange of FPG From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.04 ln(mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.28
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of FPG between before and after treatment in Pioglitazone and Metformin group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of FPG between before and after treatment in Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.0849Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of FPG between Pioglitazone and Metformin group and Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.0005Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change of HDL From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of HDL(High-Density Lipoprotein) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in HDL from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Based on the full analysis set: all participants who were eligible or drop-out, but eliminated participants were excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of HDL From Baseline at Week 12HDL at Baseline1.22 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.25
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of HDL From Baseline at Week 12HDL at Week 121.33 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.29
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of HDL From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12-0.09 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.19
PlaceboChange of HDL From Baseline at Week 12HDL at Baseline1.13 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.22
PlaceboChange of HDL From Baseline at Week 12HDL at Week 121.15 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.26
PlaceboChange of HDL From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.00 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.17
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of HDL between before and after treatment in Pioglitazone and Metformin group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.0038Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of HDL between before and after treatment in Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.3812Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of HDL between Pioglitazone and Metformin group and Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.0108Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change of LDL From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of LDL(Low-Density Lipoprotein) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then using the natural logarithm of LDL to analyze the change in LDL from baseline at week 12 and compare that between experiment group and control group, since the LDL wasn't normal distribution and was logarithmic normal distribution. Change = ln(Baseline Level) - ln(Week 12 Level).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Based on the full analysis set: all participants who were eligible or drop-out, but eliminated participants were excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of LDL From Baseline at Week 12ln(LDL) at Baseline0.90 ln(mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.32
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of LDL From Baseline at Week 12ln(LDL) at Week 120.89 ln(mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.28
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of LDL From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.02 ln(mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.2
PlaceboChange of LDL From Baseline at Week 12ln(LDL) at Baseline0.87 ln(mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.45
PlaceboChange of LDL From Baseline at Week 12ln(LDL) at Week 120.83 ln(mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.34
PlaceboChange of LDL From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.03 ln(mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.42
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of LDL between before and after treatment in Pioglitazone and Metformin group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.5476Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of LDL between before and after treatment in Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.1248Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of LDL between Pioglitazone and Metformin group and Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.362Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change of TC From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of TC(Total Cholesterol) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in TC from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Based on the full analysis set: all participants who were eligible or drop-out, but eliminated participants were excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of TC From Baseline at Week 12TC at Baseline4.76 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.79
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of TC From Baseline at Week 12TC at Week 124.74 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.88
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of TC From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.06 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.6
PlaceboChange of TC From Baseline at Week 12TC at Baseline4.76 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.04
PlaceboChange of TC From Baseline at Week 12TC at Week 124.66 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.83
PlaceboChange of TC From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.09 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.8
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of TC between before and after treatment in Pioglitazone and Metformin group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.3795Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of TC between before and after treatment in Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.4236Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of TC between Pioglitazone and Metformin group and Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 1Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change of TG From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of TG(Triglyceride) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in TG from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Based on the full analysis set: all participants who were eligible or drop-out, but eliminated participants were excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of TG From Baseline at Week 12TG at Baseline1.76 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.93
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of TG From Baseline at Week 12TG at Week 121.66 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.94
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of TG From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.09 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.77
PlaceboChange of TG From Baseline at Week 12TG at Baseline1.71 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.9
PlaceboChange of TG From Baseline at Week 12TG at Week 121.85 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.49
PlaceboChange of TG From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12-0.17 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.24
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of TG between before and after treatment in Pioglitazone and Metformin group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.3151Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of TG between before and after treatment in Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.6963Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of TG between Pioglitazone and Metformin group and Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.3204Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Change of ALT From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of ALT at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in ALT from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Based on safety set:all participants who received intervention at least once and had actual data of safety record.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of ALT From Baseline at Week 12ALT at Baseline21.98 U/LStandard Error 8.57
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of ALT From Baseline at Week 12ALT at Week 1221.63 U/LStandard Error 7.17
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of ALT From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.40 U/LStandard Error 9.14
PlaceboChange of ALT From Baseline at Week 12ALT at Baseline25.35 U/LStandard Error 12
PlaceboChange of ALT From Baseline at Week 12ALT at Week 1224.80 U/LStandard Error 10.01
PlaceboChange of ALT From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.47 U/LStandard Error 13.88
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of ALT between before and after treatment in Pioglitazone and Metformin group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.5636Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of ALT between before and after treatment in Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.3681Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of ALT between Pioglitazone and Metformin group and Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.2589Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Change of AST From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of AST at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in AST from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Based on safety set:all participants who received intervention at least once and had actual data of safety record.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of AST From Baseline at Week 12AST at Baseline20.47 U/LStandard Deviation 6.92
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of AST From Baseline at Week 12AST at Week 1221.12 U/LStandard Deviation 5.58
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of AST From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12-0.41 U/LStandard Deviation 7.35
PlaceboChange of AST From Baseline at Week 12AST at Baseline22.25 U/LStandard Deviation 7.82
PlaceboChange of AST From Baseline at Week 12AST at Week 1221.87 U/LStandard Deviation 6.03
PlaceboChange of AST From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.41 U/LStandard Deviation 8.5
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of AST between before and after treatment in Pioglitazone and Metformin group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.7972Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of AST between before and after treatment in Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.7801Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of AST between Pioglitazone and Metformin group and Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.8744Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Change of DBil From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of DBil(direct bilirubin) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in DBil from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Based on safety set:all participants who received intervention at least once and had actual data of safety record.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of DBil From Baseline at Week 12DBil at Baseline3.91 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.79
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of DBil From Baseline at Week 12DBil at Week 123.69 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.08
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of DBil From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.12 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.08
PlaceboChange of DBil From Baseline at Week 12DBil at Baseline3.92 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.11
PlaceboChange of DBil From Baseline at Week 12DBil at Week 123.32 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.15
PlaceboChange of DBil From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.55 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.04
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of DBil between before and after treatment in Pioglitazone and Metformin group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.0339Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of DBil between before and after treatment in Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.0997Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of DBil between Pioglitazone and Metformin group and Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.5015Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Change of TBil From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of TBil(total bilirubin) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in TBil from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Based on safety set:all participants who received intervention at least once and had actual data of safety record.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of TBil From Baseline at Week 12TBil at Baseline15.26 mmol/LStandard Deviation 5.87
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of TBil From Baseline at Week 12TBil at Week 1214.72 mmol/LStandard Deviation 6.09
Pioglitazone and MetforminChange of TBil From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.31 mmol/LStandard Deviation 6.53
PlaceboChange of TBil From Baseline at Week 12TBil at Baseline14.09 mmol/LStandard Deviation 5
PlaceboChange of TBil From Baseline at Week 12TBil at Week 1213.44 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.23
PlaceboChange of TBil From Baseline at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 120.57 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.65
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of DBil between before and after treatment in Pioglitazone and Metformin group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.8034Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of TBil between before and after treatment in Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.7675Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of TBil between Pioglitazone and Metformin group and Placebo group. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: 0.6918Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026