Skip to content

Cepheid Rectal Sample Validation Study

A Validation Study of the Cepheid Xpert CT/NG for Detecting Chlamydia Trachomatis and Neisseria Gonorrhoeae in Rectal Samples

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02099760
Enrollment
402
Registered
2014-03-31
Start date
2013-12-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2019-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Trichomonas

Keywords

gonorrhea, chlamydia, trichomonas

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to validate Xpert CT/NG for the detection of CT and GC in rectal samples as part of the PA DOH and CLIA requirements. The evaluation of samples obtained from the pharynx is exploratory and will provide new information on the frequency of pharyngeal infection due to CT and GC. A secondary objective will be to evaluate the prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis in vaginal and rectal samples using both the Xpert system and AC2 to assess whether women positive for this pathogen rectally usually or always have vaginal infection due to this pathogen. The investigators hypothesis is that real-time PCR (polymerase chain reaction) amplification testing with the Cepheid Xpert CT/NG will have greater sensitivity than culture in detecting Neisseria gonorrhoeae in rectal samples. The investigators also hypothesize that Xpert CT/NG will be equivalent to the Gen-Probe APTIMA Combo2 (AC2) in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in rectal samples.

Detailed description

Because of its high sensitivity and specificity, NAAT testing has largely replaced bacterial culture for the diagnosis of genital CT and GC in both males and females. NAAT assays have the greatest potential for detecting CT and GC in the rectum; however, no NAAT is currently cleared for use with extragenital specimens by the US Food and Drug Administration. In order to comply with CLIA regulations, laboratories must perform in-house validations to use NAATs with rectal and pharyngeal specimens. There are multiple studies in the literature evaluating NAAT assays in diagnosing CT and GC in rectal and pharyngeal specimens using expanded reference standards, which includes positive culture result and secondary confirmatory NAAT assays. The proposed validation study is intended to provide data to support the use of NAAT for rectal and pharyngeal specimens.

Interventions

DEVICESTD testing (GC/Ct/trich)

Sponsors

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Pittsburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female participants aged 18 and older 2. Women or men who have a history of engaging in receptive anal intercourse 3. Willing to provide written informed consent for participation in this study

Exclusion criteria

1. Use of oral antibiotics in the past 7 days 2. Use of rectal douche or other rectal product in the past 24 hours 3. If female, use of a vaginal douche or vaginal product in the past 24 hours

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rectal Gonorrhea/Chlamydia testing resultapproximately 7 daysCompare the sensitivity and specificity of the Xpert NG to the AC2 and culture in detecting GC in rectal samples Compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Xpert CT to AC2 (and as necessary, for discrepant results, to Aptima CT assay) in detecting CT in rectal samples

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pharyngeal GC/Ct resultapproximately 7 daysThe evaluation of samples obtained from the pharynx is exploratory and will provide new information on the frequency of pharyngeal infection due to CT and GC.
Trichomonas Testing Resultsapproximately 7 daysevaluate the prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis in vaginal and rectal samples using both the Xpert system and AC2

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026