Skip to content

Correlation of Non-invasive Assessment, Using C.A 2.0 Device, Versus Invasive Assessment of LVEDP

Correlation of Non-invasive Assessment, Using C.A 2.0 Device, Versus Invasive Assessment of Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure (LVEDP)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02099448
Enrollment
41
Registered
2014-03-28
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2016-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to determine the accuracy of non-invasive assessment of LVEDP using the investigational device C.A 2.0.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

CorAlert Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male subject between the ages of 18 - 80 years or postmenopausal female up to 80 years of age 2. Patient undergoing elective cardiac catheterization during which LVED and aortic pressures are recorded 3. Willing and able to sign informed consent prior to study initiation

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject has a baseline heart rate of \< 60 or \>100 beats/min 2. Subject has moderate to severe valvular disease 3. Subject suffers from atrial fibrillation or other tachyarrhythmias 4. Subject suffers from hemodynamic instability 5. Subject is candidate for primary PCI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Establish the accuracy of the non-invasive device, C.A 2.0, to estimate LVEDP comparing it to the invasive hemodynamic measurement via left heart catheterizationDuring elective cardiac catheterization

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026