Skip to content

Targeted Training for Trunk Control_case Series Cerebral Palsy

Segmental Training for Trunk Control a Pilot Study for Children With Moderate to Severe Motor Impairment.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02097836
Acronym
CP_TT
Enrollment
11
Registered
2014-03-27
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2010-01-31
Last updated
2017-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy, Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

postural control, Targeted Training, cerebral palsy, trunk segments

Brief summary

If a child with cerebral palsy does not develop independent sitting balance by 4 years of age, their prognosis for walking is very poor. Surprisingly little is known about how to facilitate head control or upright sitting balance and functional mobility in the child who is not developing these skills. This is one of the first studies that will examine intermediate stages in the development of the postural control system in children with neurologic deficits. Clinical researchers at The Movement Centre in Oswestry, England have developed a method called Targeted Training in which trunk control is trained in children segment by segment using a specific training device. This study aims to examine kinematic and electromyographic changes in a case series of children who undergo a 6-month Targeted Training intervention.

Interventions

Custom training devices were imported from The Movement Centre for research purposes. The typical course of treatment involves loaning the customized equipment to each family for use in their home or in their child's educational setting. Training occurs once daily usually for 30-45 minutes. This is done 5 or 6 days per week. Training programs typically involve playing with balls or balloons or video games that motivate the child to hold the head erect and to wave the arms and hands and move the upper body.

Sponsors

University of Oregon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Gross Motor Function Measure Outcome was masked for temporal order and video scored by reviewers who were not involved in data collections or intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* neurologic diagnosis that results in a deficit in trunk control (i.e. cerebral palsy, traumatic brain injury) * age 4-17 years * Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level III, IV or V for children with cerebral palsy

Exclusion criteria

* spinal fixation * fixed scoliosis * uncontrolled seizures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Gross Motor Function Measure6 months and followup post training 12 months
Probe data, balancebaseline, intervention, 2 months post interventiontimed balance task

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in head stability6 months, 1,3, and 12 months post interventionChange in alignment and stability of head postural sway during quiet sitting
Change in muscle activation strategy during quiet sitting with different levels of external support.6 months, 1 and 3 months post intervention
Change in Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI)6 months and 1,3, 12 months post intervention
Qualitative Parent, Teacher reportduring intervention and post intervention

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026