Skip to content

A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Re-treatments With Rituximab in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Anti-tnfa Therapies

An Open Label Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Re-treatments With Rituximab (MabThera/Rituxan) in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Anti-TNFa Therapies

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02097745
Enrollment
341
Registered
2014-03-27
Start date
2004-06-30
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2016-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This study will assess the long-term safety and efficacy of repeating treatment with MabThera, in combination with methotrexate and steroids, in patients who were previously randomized into MabThera study WA17042. The anticipated time on study treatment is until Mabthera is available on the local market and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Interventions

DRUGmethotrexate

a 10-25 mg stable dose given orally or parenterally throughout study

DRUGrituximab [MabThera/Rituxan]

1 g given by intravenous infusion on Days 1 and 15 of each treatment course

Sponsors

Biogen
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients 18-80 years of age with active RA; * patients who participated in MabThera study WA17042, and completed to at least the Week 24 visit; * eligible for re-treatment, based on clinical symptoms; * patients of reproductive potential must be using reliable contraceptive methods.

Exclusion criteria

* patients who participated in MabThera study WA17042 but withdrew into the safety follow-up; * current treatment with any other disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (apart from methotrexate), or any anti-TNFalfa, anti-IL1, or other biologic therapies; * development of any new contraindications to receiving MabThera; * women who are pregnant or breast-feeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) ResponseBaseline to the end of the retreatment period (up to 7 years, 6 months)A patient had an ACR20 response if there was at least a 20% improvement, ie, reduction from Baseline, in tender and swollen joint counts (28 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: Separate patient and physician assessments of patient disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, left end=no disease activity \[symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms\], right end=maximum disease activity; patient assessment of pain in previous 24 hours on a VAS (left end=no pain and right end=unbearable pain); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and acute-phase reactant (either C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate). The ACR20 response was compared to Baseline in the precursor study WA17042. The first retreatment may have occurred in the precursor study WA17042.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity and DAS28 RemissionBaseline to the end of the retreatment period (up to 7 years, 6 months)The DAS28 is an index for measuring disease activity in rheumatic arthritis and includes swollen and tender joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and general health (GH) status. The index is calculated with the following formula: DAS28 = (0.56 × √(TJC28)) + (0.28 × √(SJC28)) + (0.7 × log(ESR)) + (0.014 × GH), where TJC28 = tender joint count and SJC28 = swollen joint count, each on 28 joints. GH = a patient's global assessment of disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a 100 mm visual analog scale (left end = no disease activity \[symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms\], right end = maximum disease activity \[maximum arthritis disease activity\]). When ESR equaled 0 mm/hr, it was set to 1 mm/hr. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. Low disease activity was defined as a DAS28 score ≤ 3.2. DAS28 remission was defined as a DAS28 score \< 2.6. The first retreatment may have occurred in the precursor study WA17042.
Percentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesBaseline to the end of the retreatment period (up to 7 years, 6 months)Change of the Disease Activity Score 28 score from baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score ≤ 3.2, a change from baseline of \< -1.2 was a good response, \< -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 was a moderate response, and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 3.2 to ≤ 5.1, a change from baseline of \< -0.6 was a moderate response and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 5.1, a change from baseline \< -1.2 was a moderate response and ≥ -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores \> 3.2. The first retreatment may have occurred in the precursor study WA17042.
Change From Baseline in the American College of Rheumatology n (ACRn) ResponseBaseline to the end of the retreatment period (up to 7 years, 6 months)The ACRn response was defined as each participant's least favorable percentage change from Baseline in 3 measures, tender joint count, swollen joint count (28 assessed joints), and improvement score achieved in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR parameters: Separate patient and physician assessments of patient disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, left end=no disease activity, right end=maximum disease activity; patient assessment of pain in previous 24 hours on a VAS (left end=no pain, right end=unbearable pain); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and acute-phase reactant (either C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate). A higher change percentage indicates greater improvement from Baseline. The ACRn response was compared to Baseline in the precursor study WA17042. The first retreatment may have occurred in the precursor study WA17042.
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScoreBaseline to the end of the retreatment period (up to 7 years, 6 months)The HAQ-DI is a questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis and consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Participants completed the questionnaire by answering the 20 questions on a scale of 0 (without difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). A negative change score indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health SurveyBaseline to the end of the retreatment period (up to 7 years, 6 months)The SF-36 Health Survey uses patient-reported symptoms on 8 subscales to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Physical Component Summary (PCS) score summarizes the subscales Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, and General Health. The Mental Component Summary (MCS) score summarizes the subscales Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, and Mental Health. Each score was scaled from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating better HRQoL. A positive change score indicates an improvement in HRQoL.
Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)Baseline to the end of the retreatment period (up to 7 years, 6 months)The DAS28 is an index for measuring disease activity in rheumatic arthritis and includes swollen and tender joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and general health (GH) status. The index is calculated with the following formula: DAS28 = (0.56 × √(TJC28)) + (0.28 × √(SJC28)) + (0.7 × log(ESR)) + (0.014 × GH), where TJC28 = tender joint count and SJC28 = swollen joint count, each on 28 joints. GH = a patient's global assessment of disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a 100 mm visual analog scale (left end = no disease activity \[symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms\], right end = maximum disease activity \[maximum arthritis disease activity\]). When ESR equaled 0 mm/hr, it was set to 1 mm/hr. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where a higher score represents higher disease activity. A negative change score indicates improvement. The first retreatment may have occurred in the precursor study WA17042.
Percentage of Participants With no Radiographic Progression From Baseline to Year 5Baseline to Year 5Radiographic progression was defined as a change of ≤ 0 in the total Genant-modified Sharp score. The Genant-modified Sharp scoring system assesses structural damage due to rheumatoid arthritis in radiographs. A score for erosions of 0-3.5 (8 gradations) is assigned for 14 joints in each hand and wrist, and 6 joints in each foot. Joint space narrowing scores of 0-4 (9 gradations) are assigned to 13 joints in each hand and 6 joints in each foot. The maximum erosion score is 40 x 3.5 = 140. The maximum joint space narrowing score is 38 x 4.0 = 152. Both the erosion and joint space narrowing scores are normalized to 145 and are added together for a maximum total Genant-modified Sharp score of 290; the minimum score is 0. A higher score indicates more damage. Data is reported for 2 groups.
Change From Baseline in the Total Genant-modified Sharp Score at Year 5Baseline to Year 5The Genant-modified Sharp scoring system assesses structural damage due to rheumatoid arthritis in radiographs. A score for erosions of 0-3.5 (8 gradations) is assigned for 14 joints in each hand and wrist, and 6 joints in each foot. Joint space narrowing scores of 0-4 (9 gradations) are assigned to 13 joints in each hand and 6 joints in each foot. The maximum erosion score is 40 x 3.5 = 140. The maximum joint space narrowing score is 38 x 4.0 = 152. Both the erosion and joint space narrowing scores are normalized to 145 and are added together for a maximum total Genant-modified Sharp score of 290; the minimum score is 0. A higher score indicates more damage. A negative change score indicates improvement. Data is reported for 2 groups.
Change From Baseline in the Genant-modified Sharp Erosion Score at Year 5Baseline to Year 5The Genant-modified Sharp scoring system assesses structural damage due to rheumatoid arthritis in radiographs. A score for erosions of 0-3.5 (8 gradations) is assigned for 14 joints in each hand and wrist, and 6 joints in each foot. The maximum erosion score is 40 x 3.5 = 140 which is normalized to 145. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 145. A higher score indicates more damage. A negative change score indicates improvement. Data is reported for 2 groups.
Change From Baseline in the Genant-modified Sharp Joint Space Narrowing Score at Year 5Baseline to Year 5The Genant-modified Sharp scoring system assesses structural damage due to rheumatoid arthritis in radiographs. A score joint space narrowing of 0-4 (9 gradations) is assigned to 13 joints in each hand and 6 joints in each foot. The maximum joint space narrowing score is 38 x 4.0 = 152 which is normalized to a score of 145. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 145. A higher score indicates more damage. A negative change score indicates improvement. Data is reported for 2 groups.
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Year 5Baseline to Year 5The HAQ-DI is a questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis and consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Participants completed the questionnaire by answering the 20 questions on a scale of 0 (without difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). A negative change score indicates improvement. Data is reported for 2 groups.
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreBaseline to the end of the retreatment period (up to 7 years, 6 months)The FACIT-F is a 13-item participant self-reporting questionnaire that assesses fatigue over the previous 7 days by scoring each item on a 5-point scale (0=Not at all, 1=A little bit, 2=Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much). An overall FACIT-F score was obtained by summing the scores of all 13 items. The overall score ranged from 0 to 52. A lower score indicates less fatigue. A negative change score indicates improvement.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rituximab
Participants received rituximab 1 g intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 15 of each course of retreatment. In addition, participants received methotrexate 10-25 mg/week orally or parenterally, methylprednisolone 100 mg IV 30 minutes prior to both rituximab infusions, and a stable dose of folic acid ≥ 5 mg/week or equivalent, given as either a single dose or as divided daily doses.
335
Total335

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdministrative/Other27
Overall StudyAdverse Event25
Overall StudyDeath16
Overall StudyFailure to Return14
Overall StudyReason Not Specified96

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRituximab
Age, Continuous53.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.81
Sex: Female, Male
Female
273 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
62 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
112 / 140327 / 335
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 140197 / 335

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response

A patient had an ACR20 response if there was at least a 20% improvement, ie, reduction from Baseline, in tender and swollen joint counts (28 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: Separate patient and physician assessments of patient disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, left end=no disease activity \[symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms\], right end=maximum disease activity; patient assessment of pain in previous 24 hours on a VAS (left end=no pain and right end=unbearable pain); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and acute-phase reactant (either C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate). The ACR20 response was compared to Baseline in the precursor study WA17042. The first retreatment may have occurred in the precursor study WA17042.

Time frame: Baseline to the end of the retreatment period (up to 7 years, 6 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants who received any part of an infusion of study medication in study WA17531.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) ResponseRetreatment 1 (n = 320)67.5 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) ResponseRetreatment 2 (n = 267)74.9 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) ResponseRetreatment 3 (n = 234)73.9 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) ResponseRetreatment 4 (n = 175)67.4 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) ResponseRetreatment 5 (n = 136)69.9 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) ResponseRetreatment 6 (n = 92)72.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the American College of Rheumatology n (ACRn) Response

The ACRn response was defined as each participant's least favorable percentage change from Baseline in 3 measures, tender joint count, swollen joint count (28 assessed joints), and improvement score achieved in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR parameters: Separate patient and physician assessments of patient disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, left end=no disease activity, right end=maximum disease activity; patient assessment of pain in previous 24 hours on a VAS (left end=no pain, right end=unbearable pain); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and acute-phase reactant (either C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate). A higher change percentage indicates greater improvement from Baseline. The ACRn response was compared to Baseline in the precursor study WA17042. The first retreatment may have occurred in the precursor study WA17042.

Time frame: Baseline to the end of the retreatment period (up to 7 years, 6 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants who received any part of an infusion of study medication in study WA17531.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RituximabChange From Baseline in the American College of Rheumatology n (ACRn) ResponseRetreatment 2 (n = 267)39.25 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 35.494
RituximabChange From Baseline in the American College of Rheumatology n (ACRn) ResponseRetreatment 1 (n = 320)32.04 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 37.709
RituximabChange From Baseline in the American College of Rheumatology n (ACRn) ResponseRetreatment 3 (n = 234)39.89 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 41.166
RituximabChange From Baseline in the American College of Rheumatology n (ACRn) ResponseRetreatment 4 (n = 175)37.71 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 43.201
RituximabChange From Baseline in the American College of Rheumatology n (ACRn) ResponseRetreatment 5 (n = 136)37.59 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 41.109
RituximabChange From Baseline in the American College of Rheumatology n (ACRn) ResponseRetreatment 6 (n = 92)35.53 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 38.65
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)

The DAS28 is an index for measuring disease activity in rheumatic arthritis and includes swollen and tender joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and general health (GH) status. The index is calculated with the following formula: DAS28 = (0.56 × √(TJC28)) + (0.28 × √(SJC28)) + (0.7 × log(ESR)) + (0.014 × GH), where TJC28 = tender joint count and SJC28 = swollen joint count, each on 28 joints. GH = a patient's global assessment of disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a 100 mm visual analog scale (left end = no disease activity \[symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms\], right end = maximum disease activity \[maximum arthritis disease activity\]). When ESR equaled 0 mm/hr, it was set to 1 mm/hr. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where a higher score represents higher disease activity. A negative change score indicates improvement. The first retreatment may have occurred in the precursor study WA17042.

Time frame: Baseline to the end of the retreatment period (up to 7 years, 6 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants who received any part of an infusion of study medication in study WA17531.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)Retreatment 1 (n = 304)-2.32 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.336
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)Retreatment 2 (n = 258)-2.77 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.302
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)Retreatment 3 (n = 227)-3.01 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.388
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)Retreatment 4 (n = 168)-3.05 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.537
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)Retreatment 5 (n = 132)-3.15 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.536
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)Retreatment 6 (n = 87)-2.96 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score

The FACIT-F is a 13-item participant self-reporting questionnaire that assesses fatigue over the previous 7 days by scoring each item on a 5-point scale (0=Not at all, 1=A little bit, 2=Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much). An overall FACIT-F score was obtained by summing the scores of all 13 items. The overall score ranged from 0 to 52. A lower score indicates less fatigue. A negative change score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to the end of the retreatment period (up to 7 years, 6 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants who received any part of an infusion of study medication in study WA17531.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreRetreatment 1 (n = 321)10.790 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7934
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreRetreatment 2 (n = 272)6.390 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1312
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreRetreatment 3 (n = 232)7.075 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8208
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreRetreatment 4 (n = 176)6.770 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4043
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreRetreatment 5 (n = 131)8.030 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4571
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreRetreatment 6 (n = 89)5.429 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4251
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Genant-modified Sharp Erosion Score at Year 5

The Genant-modified Sharp scoring system assesses structural damage due to rheumatoid arthritis in radiographs. A score for erosions of 0-3.5 (8 gradations) is assigned for 14 joints in each hand and wrist, and 6 joints in each foot. The maximum erosion score is 40 x 3.5 = 140 which is normalized to 145. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 145. A higher score indicates more damage. A negative change score indicates improvement. Data is reported for 2 groups.

Time frame: Baseline to Year 5

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants who received any part of an infusion of study medication in study WA17531. Only participants who had radiographs available at Baseline and Year 5 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Genant-modified Sharp Erosion Score at Year 53.101 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.898
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Genant-modified Sharp Erosion Score at Year 51.880 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4491
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Genant-modified Sharp Joint Space Narrowing Score at Year 5

The Genant-modified Sharp scoring system assesses structural damage due to rheumatoid arthritis in radiographs. A score joint space narrowing of 0-4 (9 gradations) is assigned to 13 joints in each hand and 6 joints in each foot. The maximum joint space narrowing score is 38 x 4.0 = 152 which is normalized to a score of 145. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 145. A higher score indicates more damage. A negative change score indicates improvement. Data is reported for 2 groups.

Time frame: Baseline to Year 5

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants who received any part of an infusion of study medication in study WA17531. Only participants who had radiographs available at Baseline and Year 5 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Genant-modified Sharp Joint Space Narrowing Score at Year 52.344 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3263
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Genant-modified Sharp Joint Space Narrowing Score at Year 51.322 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7831
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score

The HAQ-DI is a questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis and consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Participants completed the questionnaire by answering the 20 questions on a scale of 0 (without difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). A negative change score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to the end of the retreatment period (up to 7 years, 6 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants who received any part of an infusion of study medication in study WA17531.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScoreRetreatment 3 (n = 234)-0.56 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.601
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScoreRetreatment 1 (n = 320)-0.51 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.569
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScoreRetreatment 2 (n = 267)-0.54 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.569
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScoreRetreatment 4 (n = 175)-0.55 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.603
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScoreRetreatment 5 (n = 136)-0.60 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.647
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScoreRetreatment 6 (n = 92)-0.55 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.653
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Year 5

The HAQ-DI is a questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis and consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Participants completed the questionnaire by answering the 20 questions on a scale of 0 (without difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). A negative change score indicates improvement. Data is reported for 2 groups.

Time frame: Baseline to Year 5

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants who received any part of an infusion of study medication in study WA17531. Only participants who had radiographs available at Baseline and Year 5 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Year 5-0.408 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5348
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Year 5-0.540 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6521
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey

The SF-36 Health Survey uses patient-reported symptoms on 8 subscales to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Physical Component Summary (PCS) score summarizes the subscales Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, and General Health. The Mental Component Summary (MCS) score summarizes the subscales Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, and Mental Health. Each score was scaled from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating better HRQoL. A positive change score indicates an improvement in HRQoL.

Time frame: Baseline to the end of the retreatment period (up to 7 years, 6 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants who received any part of an infusion of study medication in study WA17531.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health SurveyRetreatment 1: Physical Health (n = 249)7.383 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4618
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health SurveyRetreatment 1: Mental Health5.550 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.0705
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health SurveyRetreatment 2: Physical Health (n = 255)6.018 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9757
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health SurveyRetreatment 2: Mental Health5.746 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7778
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health SurveyRetreatment 3: Physical Health (n = 220)6.206 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2326
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health SurveyRetreatment 3: Mental Health4.777 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1916
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health SurveyRetreatment 4: Physical Health (n = 167)5.660 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9137
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health SurveyRetreatment 4: Mental Health4.864 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2215
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health SurveyRetreatment 5: Physical Health (n = 124)5.038 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2643
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health SurveyRetreatment 5: Mental Health5.141 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8848
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health SurveyRetreatment 6: Physical Health (n = 88)5.214 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.537
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health SurveyRetreatment 6: Mental Health2.658 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8556
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Total Genant-modified Sharp Score at Year 5

The Genant-modified Sharp scoring system assesses structural damage due to rheumatoid arthritis in radiographs. A score for erosions of 0-3.5 (8 gradations) is assigned for 14 joints in each hand and wrist, and 6 joints in each foot. Joint space narrowing scores of 0-4 (9 gradations) are assigned to 13 joints in each hand and 6 joints in each foot. The maximum erosion score is 40 x 3.5 = 140. The maximum joint space narrowing score is 38 x 4.0 = 152. Both the erosion and joint space narrowing scores are normalized to 145 and are added together for a maximum total Genant-modified Sharp score of 290; the minimum score is 0. A higher score indicates more damage. A negative change score indicates improvement. Data is reported for 2 groups.

Time frame: Baseline to Year 5

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants who received any part of an infusion of study medication in study WA17531. Only participants who had radiographs available at Baseline and Year 5 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Total Genant-modified Sharp Score at Year 55.446 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4701
RituximabChange From Baseline in the Total Genant-modified Sharp Score at Year 53.202 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5538
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity and DAS28 Remission

The DAS28 is an index for measuring disease activity in rheumatic arthritis and includes swollen and tender joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and general health (GH) status. The index is calculated with the following formula: DAS28 = (0.56 × √(TJC28)) + (0.28 × √(SJC28)) + (0.7 × log(ESR)) + (0.014 × GH), where TJC28 = tender joint count and SJC28 = swollen joint count, each on 28 joints. GH = a patient's global assessment of disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a 100 mm visual analog scale (left end = no disease activity \[symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms\], right end = maximum disease activity \[maximum arthritis disease activity\]). When ESR equaled 0 mm/hr, it was set to 1 mm/hr. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. Low disease activity was defined as a DAS28 score ≤ 3.2. DAS28 remission was defined as a DAS28 score \< 2.6. The first retreatment may have occurred in the precursor study WA17042.

Time frame: Baseline to the end of the retreatment period (up to 7 years, 6 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants who received any part of an infusion of study medication in study WA17531.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity and DAS28 RemissionRetreatment 3: Low Disease Activity (n=234)36.8 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity and DAS28 RemissionRetreatment 1: Low Disease Activity (n=314)17.2 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity and DAS28 RemissionRetreatment 1: Remission8.9 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity and DAS28 RemissionRetreatment 2: Low Disease Activity (n=265)27.9 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity and DAS28 RemissionRetreatment 2: Remission15.1 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity and DAS28 RemissionRetreatment 3: Remission18.8 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity and DAS28 RemissionRetreatment 4: Low Disease Activity (n=172)33.7 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity and DAS28 RemissionRetreatment 4: Remission20.9 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity and DAS28 RemissionRetreatment 5: Low Disease Activity (n=135)36.3 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity and DAS28 RemissionRetreatment 5: Remission20.0 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity and DAS28 RemissionRetreatment 6: Low Disease Activity (n=90)33.3 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity and DAS28 RemissionRetreatment 6: Remission15.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Responses

Change of the Disease Activity Score 28 score from baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score ≤ 3.2, a change from baseline of \< -1.2 was a good response, \< -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 was a moderate response, and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 3.2 to ≤ 5.1, a change from baseline of \< -0.6 was a moderate response and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 5.1, a change from baseline \< -1.2 was a moderate response and ≥ -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores \> 3.2. The first retreatment may have occurred in the precursor study WA17042.

Time frame: Baseline to the end of the retreatment period (up to 7 years, 6 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants who received any part of an infusion of study medication in study WA17531.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 2: No Response8.1 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 3: Moderate Response53.3 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 4: Moderate Response58.9 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 5: Moderate Response54.5 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 5: No Response9.1 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 1: Good Response (n = 304)17.1 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 1: Moderate Response64.8 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 1: No Response18.1 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 2: Good Response (n = 258)27.5 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 2: Moderate Response64.3 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 3: Good Response (n = 227)36.6 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 3: No Response10.1 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 4: Good Response (n = 168)33.9 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 4: No Response7.1 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 5: Good Response (n = 132)36.4 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 6: Good Response (n = 87)33.3 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 6: Moderate Response59.8 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or no European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponsesRetreatment 6: No Response6.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With no Radiographic Progression From Baseline to Year 5

Radiographic progression was defined as a change of ≤ 0 in the total Genant-modified Sharp score. The Genant-modified Sharp scoring system assesses structural damage due to rheumatoid arthritis in radiographs. A score for erosions of 0-3.5 (8 gradations) is assigned for 14 joints in each hand and wrist, and 6 joints in each foot. Joint space narrowing scores of 0-4 (9 gradations) are assigned to 13 joints in each hand and 6 joints in each foot. The maximum erosion score is 40 x 3.5 = 140. The maximum joint space narrowing score is 38 x 4.0 = 152. Both the erosion and joint space narrowing scores are normalized to 145 and are added together for a maximum total Genant-modified Sharp score of 290; the minimum score is 0. A higher score indicates more damage. Data is reported for 2 groups.

Time frame: Baseline to Year 5

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants who received any part of an infusion of study medication in study WA17531. Only participants who had radiographs available at Baseline and Year 5 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercentage of Participants With no Radiographic Progression From Baseline to Year 521.5 Percentage of participants
RituximabPercentage of Participants With no Radiographic Progression From Baseline to Year 532.4 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026