Mood Disorders, Psychotic Disorders
Conditions
Keywords
Mood Disorders, Psychosis, Subthreshold, Bipolar Disorder
Brief summary
The present study aims to : 1. compare different approaches (high intensity vs. low intensity) to training community providers (those who routinely treat young patients with bipolar disorder, psychosis, or sub-threshold high-risk conditions) on the implementation of family-focused treatment (FFT); 2. assess the cost of FFT training and implementation support; and 3. determine whether these different forms of clinician training are associated with different outcomes over 1 year among patients with early-onset mood and psychotic disorders.
Detailed description
Despite impressive results in laboratory settings, there has been a significant lag in the community adoption and sustainability of family interventions for early-onset mood and psychotic disorders. Our objective is to determine the optimal methods of training and monitoring the delivery of an evidence-based family-focused treatment (FFT) in community providers who treat young patients (ages 13-25) with bipolar disorder (BD), psychosis, or high-risk conditions. FFT is administered in 12 sessions of psychoeducation, communication training, and problem-solving skills training. There are six randomized controlled trials indicating that, among adults or adolescents with BD, bipolar spectrum, or psychosis-risk disorders, FFT and pharmacotherapy are associated with more rapid stabilization of symptoms, delayed recurrences, enhanced functioning, better medication adherence, and improvements in family interaction relative to comparison treatments over 1-2 years. Using a community partnered participatory approach, we will engage diverse stakeholders (clinicians, administrators, caregivers) at three community sites (Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, San Fernando Mental Health Center, Didi Hirsch Mental Health Center) that treat early-onset, lower socioeconomic status, urban, and racially and ethnically diverse bipolar and psychosis patients. We will partner with these 3 community sites to randomly assign 30 clinicians to low intensity (web-based training plus low intensity supervision) or high intensity training (live workshop and higher intensity supervision, i.e., weekly individual supervision with fidelity feedback). Clinicians will administer FFT to up to 120 patients (ages 13-25) with recent-onset mania, psychosis or high-risk conditions. We expect that 20 clinicians will complete the treatment with 80 patients. Dependent variables will be empirically-derived fidelity component scores over time as measured by supervisors and clinicians. We hypothesize that after training, clinicians in both the high and low intensity groups will attain minimum levels of fidelity required for certification in the four components. However, clinicians in high intensity training will sustain higher levels of fidelity across subsequent treatment cases, and will be more satisfied and more likely to adopt the FFT model. This study will facilitate the translation of an evidence-based intervention and identify effective treatment components to inform larger-scale dissemination of FFT in community settings.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALHigh Intensity Training
This is a training method involving a live workshop followed by high intensity technical consultation.
BEHAVIORALLow Intensity Training
Clinicians complete an online workshop in family-focused therapy, followed by technical consultation sessions after every third session.
Sponsors
University of California, Los Angeles
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
For patient participants: Youth (13-17 years of age) and young adults (18-25 years of age) with the following: 1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BD) type I or II; 2. DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, or psychosis not otherwise specified \[NOS\]; 3. DSM-5 diagnosis of bipolar disorder, not elsewhere classified (formerly bipolar NOS; see criteria below); or 4. Research classification of ultra high-risk for psychosis. 5. at least one parent or step-parent with whom the subject lives is willing to participate in family treatment sessions; 6. the potential patient and relative(s) participants are able and willing to give written informed assent/consent to participate in the study. Inclusion criteria for family clinicians: 1. works at one of the participating agencies (Harbor/UCLA, San Fernando Mental Health Center, Didi Hirsch Mental Health Services) 2. provides mental health care for youth or young adults with (or at risk for) bipolar or psychotic disorders 3. are licensed (medical, psychologist, clinical social work, marriage and family therapy) mental health provider or are eligible to be a licensed mental health provider (social work / psychology intern or extern, psychiatry resident, psychiatry child and adolescent psychiatry fellow) in the State of California working under the direct supervision of a licensed mental health professional.
Exclusion criteria
for patients: 1. a DSM-5 diagnosis of autism or pervasive developmental disorder, by history or medical records; 2. evidence of mental retardation by history or medical records (IQ \< 70); 3. diagnosable and active substance or alcohol abuse or dependence disorders in the 4 months prior to study recruitment, although a lifetime history of substance or alcohol disorders can be present if the patient has been abstinent for at least 4 months; 4. a life-threatening medical disorder that requires immediate hospitalization or other emergency treatment; 5. evidence of current sexual or physical abuse of the child, and/or current domestic abuse between the adult partners. These situations usually require notification of the Department of Child Services and forms of treatment other than family therapy.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Therapist Competency and Adherence Rating | One year | This is a measure of how well the clinician administered family-focused treatment (FFT) based on ratings of audiotapes of family intervention sessions. These ratings are made every third session in both training conditions. This is an overall rating that can vary from 1 (nonadherent) to 7 (excellent adherence) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Health Questionnaire, 9 | 1 year | Self-rating of depression and impairment, administered at baseline, 4 months, and 12 months |
| Young Mania Rating Scale | 1 year | Mania symptoms (based on observer report) at baseline, 4 months and 12 months |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed