Skip to content

Preoperative Dexmedetomidine & EC50 of Propofol

Preoperative Dexmedetomidine Reduces the EC50 of Propofol for Successful i-gelTM Insertion Without Muscle Relaxants

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02097407
Acronym
PreopDXM
Enrollment
37
Registered
2014-03-27
Start date
2012-05-31
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2014-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urologic Surgery

Brief summary

Dexmedetomidine is a useful anaesthetic adjuvant for general anaesthesia. In this prospective randomised study, we determined whether preoperative dexmedetomidine administration could reduce the half maximal effective concentration (EC50) of propofol for successful i-gelTM insertion without muscle relaxants.

Detailed description

Propofol is a useful induction agent for LMA insertion without muscle relaxants because it profoundly inhibits pharyngeal and laryngeal reactivity. A previous report showed that the effect-site concentration of propofol for successful classic LMA insertion in 50% of adults (EC50) without muscle relaxants in healthy male patients was 8.72 (0.55) µg ml-1. The EC50 of propofol may be dependent on the type of LMA used. A previous study comparing the EC50 of the propofol concentration between classic and proseal LMA insertions demonstrated that the EC50 of propofol needed for proseal LMA insertion was 35% greater than that needed for classic LMA insertion. Unfortunately, no investigation has been performed to determine the EC50 of the propofol concentration required for i-gel insertion without muscle relaxants. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a selective alpha-2 agonist, has sympatholytic, sedative, and analgesic properties. Such beneficial characteristics make DEX a useful anaesthetic adjuvant for general anaesthesia. Many reports have revealed the beneficial effects of DEX in terms of reducing intraoperative anaesthetic requirements, postoperative analgesic demand, and increased haemodynamic responses to noxious stimuli such as endotracheal intubation. A previous investigation showed that preoperative clonidine, an alpha-2 agonist, decreased the EC50 required for LMA insertion. We hypothesised that preoperative DEX administration can reduce the propofol concentration required for i-gel insertion. In this study, we compared the EC50 of propofol needed for successful i-gel insertion without muscle relaxants between DEX and placebo groups

Interventions

DRUGGroup C : Saline + propofol group

All patients were pre-oxygenated with 100% oxygen with spontaneous breathing for 3 min before the end of loading of normal saline. Anaesthesia was induced with predetermined effect-site propofol concentrations using a target-controlled infusion device (Orchestra; Fresenius-Vial, Brezins, France). The first patient in Group C received an effect-site propofol concentration of 3 and 5 µg mL-1, respectively, over 5 min. After equilibration of the plasma and effect-site propofol concentrations, i-gel (size 4 for patients weighing 50-90 kg, size 3 for patients weighing 30-50 kg) was inserted using the standard technique by a single anaesthesiologist staff member with expertise in i-gel insertion and who entered the operating room immediately before i-gel insertion to blind him to the group assignment

DRUGGroup D : Dexmedetomidine + propofol group

All patients were pre-oxygenated with 100% oxygen with spontaneous breathing for 3 min before the end of loading of dexmedetomidine. Anaesthesia was induced with predetermined effect-site propofol concentrations using a target-controlled infusion device (Orchestra; Fresenius-Vial, Brezins, France). The first patient in Group D received an effect-site propofol concentration of 3 and 5 µg mL-1, respectively, over 5 min. After equilibration of the plasma and effect-site propofol concentrations, i-gel (size 4 for patients weighing 50-90 kg, size 3 for patients weighing 30-50 kg) was inserted using the standard technique by a single anaesthesiologist staff member with expertise in i-gel insertion and who entered the operating room immediately before i-gel insertion to blind him to the group assignment.

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA physical status I-II patients who were 20-65 years old and scheduled for general anaesthesia for urologic surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with an allergy to alpha-2 adrenergic agonists or propofol * Patients who anticipated difficult airway (cervical spinal disease, Mallampati score of III or IV, a mouth opening of \<2.5 cm, and/or body mass index of \>30 kg m-2), unstable teeth * Patients with bradycardia of \<50 beats/min, heart block greater than first degree, severe cardiorespiratory dysfunction * Patients with symptoms of upper respiratory infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EC50 of propofol required for successful i-gel insertionDuring i-gel insertion anticipated up to 1 minThe EC50 of propofol for successful i-gel insertion was determined by a modification of Dixon's up-and-down method. The response of each patient determined the effect-site propofol concentration for the next patient. If the response was deemed 'successful', the next target concentration of propofol was decreased by 0.5 µg mL-1. If the response was deemed a 'failure', the target concentration was increased by the same dose. The process was repeated until the sixth crossover point (success/failure) was obtained.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the total dose of propofol infused before i-gel insertionDuring i-gel insertion time anticipated upto 1minThe total amount of propofol infused before i-gel insertion was noted. The insertion time, defined as the time from picking up the i-gel until the initiation of mechanical ventilation.
the presence/severity of airway trauma after i-gel insertionAt the time point of removing the i-gel from patient's mouthAfter removing the i-gel, airway trauma (defined as any blood staining on the device) was recorded.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026