Skip to content

A Phase 2 Randomized, Open-Label Study of RRx-001 vs Regorafenib in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

A Phase 2 Randomized, Open-Label Study of RRx-001 vs Regorafenib in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02096354
Acronym
ROCKET
Enrollment
62
Registered
2014-03-26
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2020-10-08
Last updated
2024-10-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Brief summary

This two-stage study is designed to compare the safety and activity between RRx-001 against regorafenib followed by irinotecan-based therapies in a parallel comparative study. Patients who are suffering from advanced or metastatic (meaning the disease has spread) colorectal cancer are invited to participate in this study. There will be two groups of patients (Randomized, open label study), one of these will receive RRx-001 and the other one will receive regorafenib. If patients qualify to participate in this study, they will be randomly assigned to the 'interventional arm' where patients will receive the experimental drug, RRx-001, or the 'control arm' where they will receive the current standard-of-care, Regorafenib. Patients have a 66% chance (2 out of 3) of receiving RRx-001 and a 33 % chance (1 out of 3) of receiving regorafenib. On progression in the first part of the study, provided ECOG performance status is adequate, and if clinically appropriate i.e. there are no absolute or relative contraindications in the opinion of the Investigator, all subjects will enter the second part of the study and receive irinotecan plus bevacizumab. Whether patients are given RRx-001 or regorafenib, they will also receive best supportive care, which includes treatments to help manage side effects and symptoms of cancer. This is an open label study, which means patients will know to which of these treatments, RRx-001 or regorafenib, they are assigned.

Detailed description

Purpose This two-stage study is designed to compare the safety and activity between RRx-001 against regorafenib followed by irinotecan-based therapies in a parallel comparative study. Patients who are suffering from advanced or metastatic (meaning the disease has spread) colorectal cancer are invited to participate in this study. There will be two groups of patients (Randomized, open label study), one of these will receive RRx-001 and the other one will receive regorafenib. Qualifying patients will be randomly assigned (like the flip of a coin) to the 'interventional arm' and receive the experimental drug, RRx-001, or the 'control arm' where they will receive the current standard-of-care, Regorafenib. Patients will have a 66% chance (2 out of 3) of receiving RRx-001 and a 33 % chance (1 out of 3) of receiving regorafenib. On progression in the first part of the study, provided ECOG performance status is adequate, and if clinically appropriate i.e. there are no absolute or relative contraindications in the opinion of the Investigator, all subjects will enter the second part of the study receive irinotecan plus bevacizumab. Whether patients are given RRx-001 or regorafenib, they will also receive best supportive care, which includes treatments to help manage side effects and symptoms of cancer. This is an open label study, which means patients will know to which of these treatments, RRx-001 or regorafenib, they are assigned. Background Oxygen is vital to life, we need it to breathe, for example, but at the same time it gives rise to byproducts that are toxic called free radicals. Free radicals are defined as oxidants. Similarly, substances that interact with and neutralize free radicals, thus preventing them from causing damage, are called antioxidants. Examples of recognizable antioxidants are Vitamin E, Vitamin C and beta-carotene. Antioxidants are also known as free radical scavengers. When free radicals are present in excess of antioxidants damage may occur. A free radical is an unstable molecule with an unpaired electron, an electrically charged particle, which seeks out another electron to return to a state of balance. An example of a free radical is hydrogen peroxide, recognizable as the household product that bubbles when it's poured on wounds. These bubbles come from oxygen free radicals, which are toxic to bacteria and all living cells, including cancer. The fact that these free radicals are toxic has to do with how reactive they are-imagine free radicals as high-speed ball bearings that smash into other molecules in order to steal back an electron and end their radical state, which sets off a chain reaction that transforms once stable compounds into a string of reactive radicals. As new free radicals are created in this chain reaction, they randomly slam into whatever molecules they are closest to and steal their electrons, corroding them, like a biological form of rust. This process is repeated over and over, picking up speed, until an antioxidant can neutralize the free radicals and put a stop to the snowball effect. In the same way that this free radical bombardment can damage not only bacteria but also healthy tissues in the body, it is also capable of destroying cancer cells. The current consensus is that compared to normal tissue tumor cells may accumulate elevated levels of free radicals, which contribute to the development of cancer. This is potentially a fatal weakness, a form of biological Kryptonite, which can be used to advantage since the addition of even a small amount of free radicals may push the tumor over the edge, past the tipping point, above tolerable thresholds, breaking the camel's back. Similar to the expression live by the sword, die by the sword, free radicals may lead to the development of cancer but they also are capable of harming it when present in excess. RRx-001 is a completely new type of drug that comes from the U.S. aerospace or rocket science industry. It is activated to deliver free radicals to tissues that have low levels of oxygen. Compared to normal tissues, which have higher levels of oxygen, most, if not all, tumors exist in a low-oxygen environment, perhaps to prevent oxidation. In this way the free radicals delivered by RRx-001 to cancer cells under low oxygen conditions are able, in theory, to cause their targeted destruction without harming normal cells. In general, colorectal tumors have low levels of antioxidants and, without this antioxidant protection, these tumors are more likely to be harmed by free radicals, so a treatment like RRx-001, which is able to increase the free radicals in the tumor, may benefit patients with colorectal cancer; this is a reason for studying RRx-001 in colorectal cancer. So far, in a Phase 1 study, 25 men and women with advanced, incurable cancer have received RRx-001 for different lengths of time and at doses that ranged from 10 mg/m2 to 83 mg/m2 once a week. Regorafenib is a drug approved by the FDA to treat colon cancer after previous chemotherapy is no longer effective. It belongs to a class of targeted drugs known as tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Tyrosine kinases, which play a key role in many cell functions including cell growth and division, are commonly mutated or changed in cancer cells, becoming super-active and producing cells that have uncontrolled growth, and, therefore, blocking them with drugs like regorafenib may keep the cancer cells from growing.

Interventions

DRUGRegorafenib
DRUGIrinotecan

To be dosed after RRx-001 or regorafenib

Sponsors

EpicentRx, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histological or cytological documentation of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum; * Subject must have received at least oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based regimens with bevacizumab and with, cetuximab or panitumumab if KRAS wildtype and are refractory to irinotecan; * Subject has measurable disease by radiographic techniques (computerized tomography \[CT\] or magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]); * Subjects with a history of brain metastasis are eligible for the study as long as they meet all the following criteria: their brain metastases have been treated, they have no evidence of progression or hemorrhage after treatment, have been off dexamethasone for 4 weeks prior to first study drug administration, and have no ongoing requirement for dexamethasone or anti-epileptic drugs; * Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks * Subject's Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status is 0 or 1; * Adequate organ function * Fertile subjects must use effective contraception during the course of the study and for 30 days following withdrawal from the study;

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically significant cardiovascular disease; * Unresolved toxicity higher attributed to any prior therapy/procedure excluding alopecia, hypothyroidism and oxaliplatin- induced neurotoxicity ≤ Grade 2 for at least 14 days; * Evidence or history of tendency or predisposition to active bleeding. Any hemorrhage or bleeding event of Grade 3 or higher within 4 weeks of start of study medication; * Symptoms or signs of active brain metastases; * History of an allergic reaction or intolerance to irinotecan * Hepatic encephalopathy * Cholangitis that required treatment or intervention within 4 weeks of study enrollment * Concurrent anticancer therapy or any cytotoxic therapy within 1 month prior to Day 1. Corticosteroid therapy is not allowed except on dosing days; * Subject has previously received regorafenib; * Clear contraindication for systemic corticosteroids (diabetes mellitus is not per se a clear contraindication); * Severe hypoalbuminemia (albumin \< 3.0 g/dL); * Subjects who are pregnant or lactating or who are planning to become pregnant during the course of the study are excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall SurvivalFrom date of enrollment until death or censorship.From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 47 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free SurvivalBaseline, every 6-8 weeks while on study.Progression-free survival (PFS) will be defined as the elapsed time from the from date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 77 months
Number of Adverse EventsBaseline through end of treatment (28 days after last dose of study drug). Approximately 24 weeks.Incidence of related Adverse Events (AEs). SAEs and all other non-serious AEs are located in the Reported Adverse Event Module. National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 is used to grade adverse events.
Objective Response RateUp to 2 yearsPercentage of participants with ORR based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target disease. PR applied only to participants with at least one measurable lesion. Greater than or equal to 30 % decrease under baseline of the sum of longest diameters of all target measurable lesions.
Clinical Benefit RateUp to 2 yearsThe period from study entry through Disease Control. Disease Control Rate (DCR) also correlates to Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), defined as the percentage of subjects with CR, PR or SD relative to the total number of treated subjects

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited based on physician referral at four academic medical centers between May 2014 and October 2019. The first participant first visit was May 22, 2014 and the last patient last visit was October 8, 2020.

Pre-assignment details

62 participants provided informed consent to participate in the study. Prior to arm assignment, 11 patients dropped out. Thus, 51 participants were eligible to be randomized to a study arm with all 51 receiving treatment on protocol. 34 participants were evaluable and included in the efficacy population within the mITT during the interim analysis. All 51 participants are included in the safety analysis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
RRx-001 Followed by Irinotecan
Once-weekly intravenous RRx-001 at a dose of 4 mg on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 4-week cycle. On progression and if eligible, patients will receive irinotecan (with or without bevacizumab)
38
Regorafenib Followed by Irinotecan
Regorafenib daily on Days 1- 21 of a 4-week cycle. On progression and if eligible, patients will receive irinotecan (with or without bevacizumab)
13
Not Randomized
Patients consented to the trial but dropped out prior due to ineligibility to proceed to randomization
11
Total62

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event740
Overall StudyIneligible0011
Overall StudyPhysician Decision450
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject310

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRegorafenib Followed by IrinotecanNot RandomizedRRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanTotal
Age, Continuous61.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.65
58.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.25
53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.41
56.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.33
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants11 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
11 Participants10 Participants21 Participants42 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants11 participants24 participants45 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants6 Participants21 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants5 Participants17 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 381 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 3810 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 387 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival

From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 47 months

Time frame: From date of enrollment until death or censorship.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanOverall Survival8.6 months
Regorafenib Followed by IrinotecanOverall Survival4.7 months
Secondary

Clinical Benefit Rate

The period from study entry through Disease Control. Disease Control Rate (DCR) also correlates to Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), defined as the percentage of subjects with CR, PR or SD relative to the total number of treated subjects

Time frame: Up to 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanClinical Benefit Rate17 Participants
Regorafenib Followed by IrinotecanClinical Benefit Rate4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Adverse Events

Incidence of related Adverse Events (AEs). SAEs and all other non-serious AEs are located in the Reported Adverse Event Module. National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 is used to grade adverse events.

Time frame: Baseline through end of treatment (28 days after last dose of study drug). Approximately 24 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanNumber of Adverse EventsCTCAE Grade 40 Number of total adverse events
RRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanNumber of Adverse EventsCTCAE Grade 1184 Number of total adverse events
RRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanNumber of Adverse EventsCTCAE Grade 276 Number of total adverse events
RRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanNumber of Adverse EventsCTCAE Grade 315 Number of total adverse events
RRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanNumber of Adverse EventsCTCAE Grade 50 Number of total adverse events
Regorafenib Followed by IrinotecanNumber of Adverse EventsCTCAE Grade 50 Number of total adverse events
Regorafenib Followed by IrinotecanNumber of Adverse EventsCTCAE Grade 315 Number of total adverse events
Regorafenib Followed by IrinotecanNumber of Adverse EventsCTCAE Grade 187 Number of total adverse events
Regorafenib Followed by IrinotecanNumber of Adverse EventsCTCAE Grade 40 Number of total adverse events
Regorafenib Followed by IrinotecanNumber of Adverse EventsCTCAE Grade 248 Number of total adverse events
Secondary

Objective Response Rate

Percentage of participants with ORR based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target disease. PR applied only to participants with at least one measurable lesion. Greater than or equal to 30 % decrease under baseline of the sum of longest diameters of all target measurable lesions.

Time frame: Up to 2 years

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanObjective Response RatePartial Response5 Participants
RRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanObjective Response RateStable Disease12 Participants
RRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanObjective Response RateProgressive Disease6 Participants
RRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanObjective Response RateNon-Evaluable1 Participants
Regorafenib Followed by IrinotecanObjective Response RateNon-Evaluable0 Participants
Regorafenib Followed by IrinotecanObjective Response RatePartial Response0 Participants
Regorafenib Followed by IrinotecanObjective Response RateProgressive Disease6 Participants
Regorafenib Followed by IrinotecanObjective Response RateStable Disease4 Participants
Secondary

Progression Free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) will be defined as the elapsed time from the from date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 77 months

Time frame: Baseline, every 6-8 weeks while on study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanProgression Free Survival6.1 months
Regorafenib Followed by IrinotecanProgression Free Survival1.7 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026