Skip to content

Vitamin D3 and the Stress-axis in MS

Regulation of the Stress-axis by Vitamin D3 in Subjects With Multiple Sclerosis; a Double-blinded, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02096133
Enrollment
54
Registered
2014-03-26
Start date
2014-10-13
Completion date
2016-11-07
Last updated
2017-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis, vitamin D, HPA-axis, cortisol

Brief summary

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have an increased risk of developing a major depression. The investigators observed a protective effect of high vitamin D levels on the risk of depression in MS. This might be driven by the effect of vitamin D on the stress-axis. Therefore, the main goal of the present study is to assess whether high dose vitamin D supplementation results in a suppression of the stress-axis, as measured by decreased levels of cortisol.

Detailed description

The lifetime incidence of a major depression in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is 50%. (Patten et al. Neurology 2003; 61(11):1524-7) Our group reported a negative correlation between vitamin D status and depression score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in a cross-sectional dataset of Dutch MS patients. (Knippenberg et al. Acta Neurol Scand 2011; 124(3):171-5) This suggests an interaction between vitamin D and biological mechanisms affecting susceptibility to depression. Currently, we have two main hypotheses: 1) Vitamin D regulates the hypothalamic stress axis in MS. Based on our findings that cortisol releasing hormone (CRH)-positive hypothalamic neurons in the brains of MS patients stained positive for the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and 1,25(OH)2D-24-hydroxylase (24-OHase). (smolders et al. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2013;72(2):91-105) 2) Vitamin D affects T cell cytokine profile and hereby the odds of developing depression. Also in non-MS depressed patients increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines are detected (Maes et al. Metab Brain Dis 2009; 24: 27-53). Vitamin D3 has shown to be a potent promotor of T cell regulation both in vitro and in vivo. (Smolders et al. J Neuroimmunol 2008;194:7-17 and Smolders et al. PLoS One 2010;5:e15235) The main goal of this study is to assess whether supplementation of high doses vitamin D3 results in a suppression of saliva cortisol day-curves in subjects with multiple sclerosis, and we will explore whether the pro-inflammatory cytokine profile of T lymphocytes is regulated.

Interventions

DRUGCholecalciferol

Vitamin D3 solution

OTHERPlacebo comparator

Placebo comparator

Sponsors

Academic MS Center Limburg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female * Relapsing Remitting MS * At start of study \> 6 weeks in clinical remission of disease * Age \> 18 years. * Premenopausal * Treated with either no immune-modulating treatment, or the currently registered MS modulating treatments: Interferon beta 1a (Rebif®), Interferon Beta 1b (Betaferon® or Avonex®), Glatiramer Acetate (Copaxone®), dimethylfumarate (Tecfidera®), teriflunomide (Aubagio®)) or fingolimod (Gilenya®).

Exclusion criteria

* Any contraindication to vitamin D according to Summary of Product Characteristics: Hypercalcaemia, hypervitaminosis D, nephrolithiasis, diseases or conditions resulting in hypercalcaemia and/or hypercalciuria (incl. primary hyperparathyroidism), severe renal impairment . * Use of dexamethasone or other systemic glucocorticosteroids \<2 months prior to first study visit * Supplementation of \>=1000 IU/d (25µg) vitamin D2 or D3 * Medical history of disturbed vitamin D/ calcium metabolism other than low intake * Present clinical (major)depression * Present treatment with anti-depressants, benzodiazepines, or neuroleptics. * Treatment with high-dose dexamethasone for MS exacerbation during study. * Pregnancy or the intention to become pregnant during the study period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The area under the curve (AUC) of the cortisol day curveAt baseline and after 16 weeks of supplementation.This number is constructed by combining the saliva cortisol levels at awakening, 11:00, 15:00, 20:00, and 22:00 hours (5 time-points).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The slope of the cortisol day-curveAt baseline and after 16 weeks of supplementationThe slope of the day-curve is the slope of the decrease of saliva cortisol measured throughout the cortisol day curve
The cortisol awakening responseAt baseline and after 16 weeks of supplementationThe awakening response is described by the rise in saliva cortisol from awakening to 60 minutes after awakening with respectively measurements at awakening, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes and 60 minutes (5 time-points).
Clinical outcomes on depressionAt baseline and after 16 weeks of supplementationThe clinical outcomes on depression will be measured by the depression sub-score of HADS and the FSSS fatigue score.
Efficacy of supplementationAt baseline and after 16 weeks of supplementation. Side effects will also be checked at 8 weeks of supplementation.To measure efficacy 25(OH)D levels will be measured.
Side effectsAt baseline, after 8 and after 16 weeksSide effects will be measured after 8 and 16 weeks of treatment. Serum levels of calcium, albumin and creatinine will be determined, as well as calcium and creatinine levels in urine.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026