Skip to content

Comparison of Intraabdominal Pressure

Comparison of Intraabdominal Pressure and Respiratory Parameter Changes According to Positional Apparatus in the Prone Position

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02094976
Acronym
IAP
Enrollment
138
Registered
2014-03-24
Start date
2013-09-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prone Position

Keywords

Prone position, Intra-abdominal pressure, Respiratory system compliance, Jackson table, Wilson frame, Chest roll

Brief summary

Increased intra-abdominal pressure(IAP) might influence on perioperative morbidity related to increased CVP, PVWP, SVR, PAP and decreased venous return and cardiac output. Prone position has been known to increase IAP. In clinical field, various apparatuses has developed to minimize IAP elevation during prone position operation. In this study, we would compare the changes of IAP and respiratory system compliance according to positional apparatus in prone position.

Detailed description

In clinical field, Wison frame, chest rolls and Jackson table have been widely used for prone position surgery. Among those apparatus, Jackson table has padded supports under the chest and pelvis, so that the abdomen can hang freely and prevent the abdominal compression. By reducing abdominal and thoracic pressure, Jackson table would reduce blood loss, and less effects on pulmonary mechanics. But few studies has known to compare IAP with other positioning apparatus such as Wilson frame or chest roll.

Interventions

DEVICEJackson surgical table

After standard total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and remifentanil continous infusion, patients were turned to the prone position on a Jackson table with two padded supports on each side. The supports were positioned under the lateral chest and at the iliac crest.

DEVICEWilson frame

After standard total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and remifentanil continous infusion, patients were turned to the prone position on a Wilson frame. The supports were positioned vertically from shoulder to iliac crest.

DEVICEChest roll

After standard total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and remifentanil continous infusion, patients were turned to the prone position on a chest roll. The supports were positioned vertically from shoulder to iliac crest.

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who are scheduled for prone positioned spinal surgery * ASA Physical Status Classification System class I or II

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who did not agree * BMI \> 30kg/m2 * Patients who did not insert urinary foley catheter * Patients who have COPD or emphysema * Patients who have severe spine deformities such as scoliosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
changes of Intraabdominal presure (IAP)5 minute after position changeCompare IAP changes from supine to prone according to the positional apparatus : Wilson frame, Chestrolls and Jackson table

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes of IAP and total respiratory system comliance (Crs) accoridng to PEEP change1min after PEEP changeCompare IAP and Crs according to PEEP changes in each group. PEEP applied 0,3,6 and 9 cm H2O and recoding was done at 1min after PEEP change. Total respiratory system compliance (Crs) = TV/(Pplat-PEEP)
changes of dead space ventilation after position change5 minute after prone positionAfter genearal anesthetic induction, arterial blood gas analyssis (ABGA)was done at supine position. And then the position was changed to prone. 5minutes after prone position change, ABGA repeated, and calculated the dead space ventilation at each point. Dead space ventilation (Vd/Vt) = \[PaCo2-PETCO2\]/PaCo2 Finally, we would compare changes of dead space ventilation after position change.
Hemodynamic change1min after PEEP changeCheck the hemodynamic changes according to PEEP change : 0,3,6 and 9 cmH2O

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Estimated blood loss (EBL)intraoperativelyCompare the EBL among the groups.

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactHee Pyung Park, MD Phd
hppark@snu.ac.kr82-2-2072-2466
Backup ContactEugene Kim, MD
tomomie@hanmail.net82-2-2072-3108

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026