Skip to content

A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Furoate (FF) 100 mcg Once Daily With Fluticasone Propionate (FP) 250 mcg Twice Daily (BD) and FP 100 mcg BD in Well-controlled Asthmatic Japanese Subjects

201135 : A Randomised, Double-blind, Multicenter, Parallel-group Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Furoate (FF) 100 mcg Once Daily With Fluticasone Propionate (FP) 250 mcg Twice Daily (BD) and FP 100 mcg BD in Well-controlled Asthmatic Subjects Stepped Down From a Maintenance Therapy With RELVAR® Inhaler (FF/VI) 100/25 mcg Once-daily in Japanese Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02094937
Enrollment
430
Registered
2014-03-24
Start date
2014-03-27
Completion date
2015-08-28
Last updated
2017-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

fluticasone propionate, step-down regimen, well-controlled subjects, adults, switching regimen, asthma, fluticasone furoate, fluticasone furoate/Vilanterol

Brief summary

The primary aim of this study is to clarify the position of FF and FF/Vilanterol (VI) 100/25 micrograms (mcg) compared with existing therapies by assessing FF dosage equivalent to low to middle-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). The study is divided into Run-in period, Period 1 (open-label treatment), Period 2 (double blind treatment) and Follow-up. Subjects with well controlled asthma after completing a run-in period of 4 weeks will be switched from middle-dose ICS/long acting beta 2 agonist (LABA) equivalent dose to once-daily FF/VI 100/25 mcg for an 8 weeks treatment period (Period 1). After this, subjects will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either FP 250 mcg twice daily, FP 100 mcg twice daily or FF 100 mcg once daily in a 12 week double blind treatment period (Period 2). There will be a 1 week Follow-up Period following completion of the double-blind treatment period, or early withdrawal from the study. Overall , the total duration of subject's participation in the study will be for 25 weeks. RELVAR is a registered trademark of the GSK group of companies.

Interventions

FF/VI 100mg/25 mcg is available as a dry white powder to be given once daily in the evening via dry powder inhaler

FF 100 mcg is available as a dry white powder to be given once daily in the evening via dry powder inhaler

FP 250 mcg is available as a dry white powder to be given twice daily (morning and evening) via dry powder inhaler

FP 100 mcg is available as a dry white powder to be given twice daily (morning and evening) via dry powder inhaler

DRUGFluticasone Furoate Placebo

Matching placebo of Fluticasone Furoate will be given once daily in the evening via dry powder inhaler

Matching placebo of Fluticasone Propionate will be given twice daily (morning and evening) via dry powder inhaler

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent: Subjects must give their signed and dated written informed consent to participate. * Type of Subject: Outpatients 18 years of age or older at Visit 1. Subjects must have a diagnosis of asthma as defined by the National Institutes of Health at least 1 year prior to Visit 1. * Gender: Male or Eligible Female, defined as non-childbearing potential or childbearing potential using an acceptable method of birth control consistently and correctly, as defined by the following: Male partner who is sterile prior to the female subject's entry into the study and is the sole sexual partner for that female subject; Oral contraceptive (either combined estrogen/progestin); Any intrauterine device (IUD) with a documented failure rate of less than 1% per year; Double barrier method - spermacide plus a mechanical barrier (e.g., spermacide plus a male condom or a spermacide and female diaphragm); Females of childbearing potential who are not sexually active must commit to complete abstinence from intercourse throughout the clinical trial and for a period after the trial to account for elimination of the drug (minimum of six days); Female subjects should not be enrolled if they are pregnant, lactating or plan to become pregnant during the time of study participation. A serum pregnancy test is required for females of childbearing potential at the initial screening visit (Visit 1) and Visit 11 or Early Withdrawal. In addition a urine pregnancy test will be performed on all females of childbearing potential at Visit 2, Visit 5 and Visit 12. * Severity of Disease: A best pre-bronchodilator FEV1 of \>=80% of the predicted normal value at the screening visit (Visit 1). Predicted values will be based upon National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III. As subjects are Asian, the Asian adjustment will be used. * Stable Asthma: Subjects must have stable asthma, as judged by the Investigator. This includes no change in asthma medication for at least 8 weeks prior to Visit 1 and an ACT score of \>=20 at Visit 1. * Current Anti-Asthma Therapy: All subjects must be using the middle-dose ICS/LABA which is equivalent to twice-daily combination of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol 250 mcg for at least 12 weeks prior to the registration visit. In addition, the prescription of the middle-dose ICS/LABA shouldn't be changed at least 8 weeks prior to Visit 1. * Short-Acting Beta2-Agonists (SABA): All subjects must be able to use salbutamol aerosol inhaler which will be provided as a rescue medication at Visit 1 during the study as needed. Subjects must be able to avoid using salbutamol for at least 6 hours prior to study visits. * 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG): Evidence of significant normality in the 12-lead ECG performed at Visit 1, as judged by the investigator Selected specific ECG findings that are not considered to be significant and will not exclude the subject from study participation include, but are not limited to, the following: T interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) \<450 milliseconds (msec) or QTc \<480 msec for patients with bundle branch block. The QTc is the QT interval corrected for heart rate according to Fridericia's formula (QTcF), machine overread. The QTc should be based on single or averaged QTc values of triplicate electrocardiograms (ECGs) obtained over a brief recording period. If there are any clinically significant abnormalities including but not limited to a T interval for heart rate (QT) prolonged, confirm with two additional ECGs taken. Other inclusion criteria at Visit 2 and Visit 5: * Subjects whose asthma meets the criterion of well-controlled (as defined in the protocol), and in the Investigators judgement it is acceptable for subject to switch (Visit 2) and step-down (Visit 5) in one week prior to Visit 2 or Visit 5. * Compliance rate of the middle-dose ICS/LABA which is equivalent to twice-daily combination of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol 250 mcg (Visit1- Visit 2) and FF/VI 100/25 mcg (Visit 2 - Visit5) should be achieved \>=80% * Compliance with completion of both morning and evening eDairy data fulfils \>=5days in one week prior to Visit 2 and Visit 5.

Exclusion criteria

* History of Life-threatening asthma: Defined for this protocol as an asthma episode that required intubation and/or was associated with hypercapnia, respiratory arrest or hypoxic seizures within the last 10 years. * Respiratory Infection: Culture-documented or suspected bacterial or viral infection of the upper or lower respiratory tract, sinus or middle ear that is not resolved within 8 weeks of Visit 1 and led to a change in asthma management or, in the opinion of the Investigator, is expected to affect the subject's asthma status or the subject's ability to participate in the study. * Asthma Exacerbation: Any asthma exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids or injection within 12 weeks of Visit 1 or that resulted in overnight hospitalization requiring additional treatment for asthma within 6 months prior to Visit 1. * Concurrent Respiratory Disease: A subject must not have current evidence of pneumonia, pneumothorax, atelectasis, pulmonary fibrotic disease, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or other respiratory abnormalities other than asthma. * Other Concurrent Diseases/Abnormalities: A subject must not have any clinically significant, uncontrolled condition or disease state that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the safety of the subject at risk through study participation or would confound the interpretation of the efficacy results if the condition/disease exacerbated during the study. The list of additional excluded conditions/diseases includes, but is not limited to the following: congestive heart failure, known aortic aneurysm, clinically significant coronary heart disease, clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia, stroke within 3 months of Visit 1, uncontrolled hypertension (two or more measurements with systolic BP \>160 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), or diastolic BP \>100mmHg), recent or poorly controlled peptic ulcer, haematologic, hepatic, or renal disease, immunologic compromise, current malignancy (history of malignancy is acceptable only if subject has been in remission for one year prior to Visit 1 (remission = no current evidence of malignancy and no treatment for the malignancy in the 12 months prior to Visit 1)), tuberculosis (current or untreated) \[Subjects with a history of tuberculosis infection who have completed an appropriate course of antituberculous treatment may be suitable for study entry provided that there is no clinical suspicion of active or recurrent disease\], Cushing's disease, Addison's disease, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled thyroid disorder, recent history of drug or alcohol abuse * Oropharyngeal Examination: A subject will not be eligible for the run-in if he/she has clinical visual evidence of candidiasis at Visit 1. * Investigational Medications: A subject must not have used any investigational drug within 30 days prior to Visit 1 or within five half-lives (t1/2) of the prior investigational study (whichever is longer of the two). * Allergies: Drug Allergy: Any adverse reaction including immediate or delayed hypersensitivity to any beta2-agonist, sympathomimetic drug, or any intranasal, inhaled, or systemic corticosteroid therapy. Known or suspected sensitivity to the constituents of the investigational product (i.e., lactose or magnesium stearate); Milk Protein Allergy: History of severe milk protein allergy. * Concomitant Medication: Administration of prescription or over the counter medication that would significantly affect the course of asthma, or interact with study drug, such as: anticonvulsants (barbiturates, hydantoins, carbamazepine); polycyclic antidepressants; beta-adrenergic blocking agents; phenothiazines and monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors; Immunosuppressive Medications: A subject must not be using or require use of immunosuppressive medications during the study. Note: Immunotherapy for the treatment of allergies is allowed during the study provided it was initiated at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 and subjects remain in the maintenance phase for the duration of the study; Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors: Subjects who have received a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor within 4 weeks of Visit 1 (e.g.,Clarithromycin, atazanavir, indinavir, itraconazole, ketoconazole, nefazadone, nelfinavir; ritonavir; saquinavir; telithromycin, troleandomycin, voriconazole, mibefradil, cyclosporine, etc). * Compliance: A subject will not be eligible if he/she or his/her parent or legal guardian has any infirmity, disability, disease, or geographical location which seems likely (in the opinion of the Investigator) to impair compliance with any aspect of this study protocol, including visit schedule and completion of eDiaries and a paper medical conditions diary. * Tobacco Use: Current smoker or a smoking history of 10 pack years (e.g., 20 cigarettes/day for 10 years). A subject may not have used inhaled tobacco products within the past 3 months (i.e., cigarettes, cigars or pipe tobacco). * Affiliation with Investigator's Site: A subject will not be eligible for this study if he/she is an immediate family member of the participating Investigator, sub-Investigator, study coordinator, or employee of the participating Investigator. Other

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants (Par) Withdrawn From the Study Due to Poorly-controlled Asthma During Period 2From Week 9 to Week 20Asthma symptom scores (SS) were recorded by par using ratings 0 (no symptoms) to 5-symptoms so severe that par could not perform normal activity \[morning\] or to 4-symptoms so severe that par could not sleep at all \[nightly\]. Withdrawal due to poorly-controlled(WPC) (required step-up therapy) asthma was defined as asthma worsening/exacerbation or ≧3 per week of : day symptoms on ≧ 2 days, rescue use on ≧2 days, morning PEF \<80 % of best effort on ≧ 1 day, night symptoms on ≧1 or more day, a best pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) \< 80% at clinic . Percentage of par WPC asthma at visit 6, 7, 9 and 11 (Week 10, 12, 16 and 20 respectively) were reported. Cox Proportional Hazards Model was used with covariates of Baseline FEV1, gender, age and treatment group. Analysis was descriptive only, no p -values calculated, treatment differences and associated 95% CI were produced.
Percentage of Participants With 'Well-controlled Asthma' at the End of Period 2Week 20Asthma symptom scores(SS) were recorded by par using ratings 0 (no symptoms) to 5-symptoms so severe that par could not perform normal activity\[morning\] or to 4-symptoms so severe that par could not sleep at all\[nightly\]. Well-controlled asthma was defined as having no exacerbation/asthma worsening, no night-time symptoms, a best pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second ≥80% at clinic, and ≥2 per week of: daytime symptoms on ≤1 day, rescue use on ≤1 day, or morning peak expiratory flow ≥80% of the best effort value. Well-controlled asthma at the end of period 2 was assessed in the week prior to Visit 11 (Week 20). Percentage of participants were calculated as the number of participants with well-controlled asthma divided by total number participants excluding withdrawals prior to visit 11 (end of period 2) other than asthma worsening/exacerbation. A Logistic Regression Model was used with covariates of Baseline FEV1, gender, age and treatment group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Symptom Free 24 Hour Periods During Period 2From Week 9 to Week 20Participants who were symptom free for 24-hours were assessed with the help of a daily Dairy. It included the details on daily asthma symptom scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 5-symptoms so severe that participant could not perform normal activity \[morning\] or to 4-symptoms so severe that participants could not sleep at all \[nightly\]. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as percentage of symptom free 24 hours during Period 2 (Week 9 to Week 20) minus Baseline. The Baseline value was the mean of the daily values in one week prior to randomization (Visit 5: Week 8). Adjusted mean change from baseline is presented \[least square mean (LSM)\].
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue Free 24 Hour (hr) Periods During Period 2From Week 9 to Week 20The time during which the participants did not have to take any rescue medication (medication intended to relieve symptoms immediately) was considered as a rescue free period. Participants who did not require inhalation of salbutamol (rescue medication) for 24-hours were captured with the help of a daily dairy, all participants were required to record use of rescue medication daily for day and night time separately on e-diary. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as percentage of rescue free 24 hour period during Period 2 (Week 9 to Week 20) minus Baseline value. The Baseline value was the mean of the daily values in one week prior to randomization (Visit 5: Week 8). Adjusted mean change from baseline is presented \[least square mean (LSM)\].
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 at the End of Period 2Week 20FEV measures amount of air a person can exhale during a forced breath. The amount of air exhaled in one second of the forced breath is FEV1. Trough FEV1 was measured between 3pm and 11pm excluding Visit 1. Highest value from the three acceptable measurements were recorded. Change from Baseline was calculated as adjusted mean FEV1 value during Period 2 minus Baseline. The Baseline value was the predose value at the randomization (Visit 5: Week 8). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) Model was used with covariates of baseline FEV1, gender, age and treatment group. The adjusted mean from this model is presented \[least square mean (LSM)\].
Proportion of Subjects With ACT Score >= 20 at Visit 11 (Week 20)Week 20Asthma control test is a five item questionnaire with each response rating from 1 to 5 (1 is severe and 5 is no event) of asthma events over previous 4-weeks. The questions were designed to be self-completed by the participant. The percentage of participants with ACT score \>=20 at the end of the Period 2 were analyzed using a logistic regression model including covariates for baseline ACT score, gender, age and treatment group.
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score at the End of Period 2Week 20The total ACT score is the sum of the scores attributed to the five questions, ranging from 5 (poor control of asthma) to 25 (complete control of asthma), with higher scores reflecting greater asthma control. An ACT score \>=20 indicates well-controlled asthma. The questions were designed to be self-completed by the participant. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as ACT score at the end of Period 2 (Week 20) minus Baseline value. The Baseline value was the predose value at randomization (Visit 5: Week 8). Adjusted mean change from baseline is presented \[least square mean(LSM)\].
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) PEF Averaged During Period 2From Week 9 to Week 20Peak expiratory flow is a person's maximum speed of expiration, as measured with a peak flow meter which determines person's ability to breathe out air. PEF was measured each morning and evening prior to study medication or any rescue salbutamol inhalation aerosol use, using an electronic peak flow meter. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as PEF value averaged during Period 2 (Week 9 to Week 20) minus Baseline. Data is presented separately for morning(AM) and evening(PM) assessments. The Baseline value was the mean of the daily values in one week prior to randomization (Visit 5: Week 8) separately for morning and evening. Adjusted mean change from baseline is presented \[least square mean (LSM)\].

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 551 participants were screened, 490 entered into the run-in period, 430 entered into the open label treatment period 1(Period 1) and 371 were further randomized to treatment Period 2 (Period 2). Note that 1 subject was randomized incorrectly even though the subject failed at randomization.

Pre-assignment details

Eligible participants entered a 4 week run-in period followed by an 8 week open label treatment period. Participants whose asthma was well controlled at visit 5 (end of Period 1) were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to a double blind study period of 12 weeks. They were informed to avoid Salbutamol inhaler within 6 hours at each visit.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Period 1- FF/VI 100/25 mcg OD
Participants received FF/VI 100/25 microgram (mcg) once daily (OD) via a dry powder inhaler for 8 weeks in the open-label treatment period. Participants were allowed to use rescue medication during the study.
430
Total430

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
12 Weeks in Period 2Adverse Event0241
12 Weeks in Period 2Lack of Efficacy0100
12 Weeks in Period 2Protocol defined stopping criteria05611
12 Weeks in Period 2Randomized incorrectly0100
12 Weeks in Period 2Withdrawal by Subject0220
8 Weeks in Period 1Adverse Event9000
8 Weeks in Period 1Lack of Efficacy3000
8 Weeks in Period 1Physician Decision1000
8 Weeks in Period 1Protocol defined stopping criteria41000
8 Weeks in Period 1Protocol Violation2000
8 Weeks in Period 1Withdrawal by Subject4000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPeriod 1- FF/VI 100/25 mcg OD
Age, Continuous48.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.11
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian-Japanese Heritage
430 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
261 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
169 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
67 / 43022 / 12322 / 12428 / 124
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 4301 / 1230 / 1241 / 124

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants (Par) Withdrawn From the Study Due to Poorly-controlled Asthma During Period 2

Asthma symptom scores (SS) were recorded by par using ratings 0 (no symptoms) to 5-symptoms so severe that par could not perform normal activity \[morning\] or to 4-symptoms so severe that par could not sleep at all \[nightly\]. Withdrawal due to poorly-controlled(WPC) (required step-up therapy) asthma was defined as asthma worsening/exacerbation or ≧3 per week of : day symptoms on ≧ 2 days, rescue use on ≧2 days, morning PEF \<80 % of best effort on ≧ 1 day, night symptoms on ≧1 or more day, a best pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) \< 80% at clinic . Percentage of par WPC asthma at visit 6, 7, 9 and 11 (Week 10, 12, 16 and 20 respectively) were reported. Cox Proportional Hazards Model was used with covariates of Baseline FEV1, gender, age and treatment group. Analysis was descriptive only, no p -values calculated, treatment differences and associated 95% CI were produced.

Time frame: From Week 9 to Week 20

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants randomized to treatment and who received at least one dose of randomized study medication in Period 2.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FF 100 mcg ODPercentage of Participants (Par) Withdrawn From the Study Due to Poorly-controlled Asthma During Period 24.9 Percentage of Participants
FP 100 mcg BDPercentage of Participants (Par) Withdrawn From the Study Due to Poorly-controlled Asthma During Period 27.3 Percentage of Participants
FP 250 mcg BDPercentage of Participants (Par) Withdrawn From the Study Due to Poorly-controlled Asthma During Period 28.1 Percentage of Participants
95% CI: [0.31, 2.49]
95% CI: [0.28, 2.19]
Primary

Percentage of Participants With 'Well-controlled Asthma' at the End of Period 2

Asthma symptom scores(SS) were recorded by par using ratings 0 (no symptoms) to 5-symptoms so severe that par could not perform normal activity\[morning\] or to 4-symptoms so severe that par could not sleep at all\[nightly\]. Well-controlled asthma was defined as having no exacerbation/asthma worsening, no night-time symptoms, a best pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second ≥80% at clinic, and ≥2 per week of: daytime symptoms on ≤1 day, rescue use on ≤1 day, or morning peak expiratory flow ≥80% of the best effort value. Well-controlled asthma at the end of period 2 was assessed in the week prior to Visit 11 (Week 20). Percentage of participants were calculated as the number of participants with well-controlled asthma divided by total number participants excluding withdrawals prior to visit 11 (end of period 2) other than asthma worsening/exacerbation. A Logistic Regression Model was used with covariates of Baseline FEV1, gender, age and treatment group.

Time frame: Week 20

Population: ITT population. Participants who withdrew prior to Visit 11 for the reasons other than exacerbation were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FF 100 mcg ODPercentage of Participants With 'Well-controlled Asthma' at the End of Period 289.5 Percentage of Participants
FP 100 mcg BDPercentage of Participants With 'Well-controlled Asthma' at the End of Period 278.2 Percentage of Participants
FP 250 mcg BDPercentage of Participants With 'Well-controlled Asthma' at the End of Period 283.1 Percentage of Participants
95% CI: [0.9, 4.12]
95% CI: [0.66, 3.2]
Secondary

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score at the End of Period 2

The total ACT score is the sum of the scores attributed to the five questions, ranging from 5 (poor control of asthma) to 25 (complete control of asthma), with higher scores reflecting greater asthma control. An ACT score \>=20 indicates well-controlled asthma. The questions were designed to be self-completed by the participant. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as ACT score at the end of Period 2 (Week 20) minus Baseline value. The Baseline value was the predose value at randomization (Visit 5: Week 8). Adjusted mean change from baseline is presented \[least square mean(LSM)\].

Time frame: Week 20

Population: ITT population. Only those participants who completed the ACT score at the end of Period 2 (Visit 11) were evaluated.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FF 100 mcg ODLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score at the End of Period 2-0.3 Score on scaleStandard Error 0.225
FP 100 mcg BDLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score at the End of Period 2-0.6 Score on scaleStandard Error 0.224
FP 250 mcg BDLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score at the End of Period 2-0.8 Score on scaleStandard Error 0.223
Secondary

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 at the End of Period 2

FEV measures amount of air a person can exhale during a forced breath. The amount of air exhaled in one second of the forced breath is FEV1. Trough FEV1 was measured between 3pm and 11pm excluding Visit 1. Highest value from the three acceptable measurements were recorded. Change from Baseline was calculated as adjusted mean FEV1 value during Period 2 minus Baseline. The Baseline value was the predose value at the randomization (Visit 5: Week 8). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) Model was used with covariates of baseline FEV1, gender, age and treatment group. The adjusted mean from this model is presented \[least square mean (LSM)\].

Time frame: Week 20

Population: ITT population. Number of participants available for the last post-baseline value during Period 2 were used for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FF 100 mcg ODLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 at the End of Period 2-0.129 LiterStandard Error 0.0158
FP 100 mcg BDLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 at the End of Period 2-0.135 LiterStandard Error 0.0154
FP 250 mcg BDLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 at the End of Period 2-0.105 LiterStandard Error 0.0155
Secondary

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) PEF Averaged During Period 2

Peak expiratory flow is a person's maximum speed of expiration, as measured with a peak flow meter which determines person's ability to breathe out air. PEF was measured each morning and evening prior to study medication or any rescue salbutamol inhalation aerosol use, using an electronic peak flow meter. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as PEF value averaged during Period 2 (Week 9 to Week 20) minus Baseline. Data is presented separately for morning(AM) and evening(PM) assessments. The Baseline value was the mean of the daily values in one week prior to randomization (Visit 5: Week 8) separately for morning and evening. Adjusted mean change from baseline is presented \[least square mean (LSM)\].

Time frame: From Week 9 to Week 20

Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at specified timepoints were analyzed

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FF 100 mcg ODLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) PEF Averaged During Period 2PEF at AM, n=122, 124, 124-18.2 Liter per minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.09
FF 100 mcg ODLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) PEF Averaged During Period 2PEF at PM, n=122, 124, 124-19.2 Liter per minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.04
FP 100 mcg BDLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) PEF Averaged During Period 2PEF at AM, n=122, 124, 124-21.3 Liter per minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.06
FP 100 mcg BDLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) PEF Averaged During Period 2PEF at PM, n=122, 124, 124-19.3 Liter per minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.01
FP 250 mcg BDLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) PEF Averaged During Period 2PEF at AM, n=122, 124, 124-18.1 Liter per minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.06
FP 250 mcg BDLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) PEF Averaged During Period 2PEF at PM, n=122, 124, 124-18.7 Liter per minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.02
Secondary

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue Free 24 Hour (hr) Periods During Period 2

The time during which the participants did not have to take any rescue medication (medication intended to relieve symptoms immediately) was considered as a rescue free period. Participants who did not require inhalation of salbutamol (rescue medication) for 24-hours were captured with the help of a daily dairy, all participants were required to record use of rescue medication daily for day and night time separately on e-diary. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as percentage of rescue free 24 hour period during Period 2 (Week 9 to Week 20) minus Baseline value. The Baseline value was the mean of the daily values in one week prior to randomization (Visit 5: Week 8). Adjusted mean change from baseline is presented \[least square mean (LSM)\].

Time frame: From Week 9 to Week 20

Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at specified time point were analyzed

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FF 100 mcg ODLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue Free 24 Hour (hr) Periods During Period 2-0.9 Percentage of rescue-free 24-hr periodsStandard Error 0.554
FP 100 mcg BDLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue Free 24 Hour (hr) Periods During Period 2-2.1 Percentage of rescue-free 24-hr periodsStandard Error 0.553
FP 250 mcg BDLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue Free 24 Hour (hr) Periods During Period 2-1.2 Percentage of rescue-free 24-hr periodsStandard Error 0.552
Secondary

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Symptom Free 24 Hour Periods During Period 2

Participants who were symptom free for 24-hours were assessed with the help of a daily Dairy. It included the details on daily asthma symptom scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 5-symptoms so severe that participant could not perform normal activity \[morning\] or to 4-symptoms so severe that participants could not sleep at all \[nightly\]. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as percentage of symptom free 24 hours during Period 2 (Week 9 to Week 20) minus Baseline. The Baseline value was the mean of the daily values in one week prior to randomization (Visit 5: Week 8). Adjusted mean change from baseline is presented \[least square mean (LSM)\].

Time frame: From Week 9 to Week 20

Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at specified time point were analyzed

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FF 100 mcg ODLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Symptom Free 24 Hour Periods During Period 2-1.0 Percentage of symptom-free 24-h periodStandard Error 0.654
FP 100 mcg BDLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Symptom Free 24 Hour Periods During Period 2-1.3 Percentage of symptom-free 24-h periodStandard Error 0.653
FP 250 mcg BDLeast Squares Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Symptom Free 24 Hour Periods During Period 2-1.8 Percentage of symptom-free 24-h periodStandard Error 0.652
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With ACT Score >= 20 at Visit 11 (Week 20)

Asthma control test is a five item questionnaire with each response rating from 1 to 5 (1 is severe and 5 is no event) of asthma events over previous 4-weeks. The questions were designed to be self-completed by the participant. The percentage of participants with ACT score \>=20 at the end of the Period 2 were analyzed using a logistic regression model including covariates for baseline ACT score, gender, age and treatment group.

Time frame: Week 20

Population: ITT population. Only those participants who completed the ACT score at the end of Period 2 (Visit 11) were evaluated.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FF 100 mcg ODProportion of Subjects With ACT Score >= 20 at Visit 11 (Week 20)99.1 Percentage of participants
FP 100 mcg BDProportion of Subjects With ACT Score >= 20 at Visit 11 (Week 20)97.4 Percentage of participants
FP 250 mcg BDProportion of Subjects With ACT Score >= 20 at Visit 11 (Week 20)96.5 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026