Skip to content

Conditions of Diagnostic Panendoscopy of the Upper Airway Under Propofol Remifentanil General Anesthesia

Evaluation of the Impact of Adding Remifentanil to Propofol on the Conditions of the Diagnostic Panendoscopy of the Upper Airway Under General Anesthesia With Tubeless Spontaneous Ventilation.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02093143
Acronym
ENDOTANIL
Enrollment
256
Registered
2014-03-20
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2013-02-28
Last updated
2014-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tumor of Ear, Nose and Throat

Keywords

Diagnostic panendoscopy of the upper airway, Total intravenous general anesthesia, Remifentanil, Propofol, Target controlled infusion, Direct laryngoscopy, Tracheoscopy, Oesophagoscopy, Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) tumor, Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) cancer

Brief summary

The most important considerations for the general anesthesia in diagnostic panendoscopy of the upper airway is the maintenance of a patient's airway for optimal surgical exposure, adequate ventilation and sufficient depth of anesthesia. Tubeless anesthestic techniques with preserved spontaneous ventilation and total intravenous administration of anesthetic drugs are widely use. Due to its pharmacological profile, propofol anesthesia is often considered as the gold standard for the anesthesia in the diagnostic panendoscopy. Previous studies suggested that adding remifentanil to propofol could improve the conditions for laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of propofol remifentanil general anesthesia compared to propofol general anesthesia on the conditions of the diagnostic panendoscopy of the upper airway.

Interventions

DRUGRemifentanil

Target-controlled infusion of remifentanil 50 µg/ml using the pharmacologic model of Minto et al. to achieve a theorical brain concentration of 1.5 ng/ml.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Elective diagnostic panendoscopy of the upper airway * Age \> 18 and \< 80 years old * American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score equal to 1, 2, or 3 with a stable condition * Written inform consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Age \< 18 years old or inability to give informed consent * Known anaphylaxis to remifentanil or propofol * Long term opioid use, drug abuse * Predictive criterion of impossible mask ventilation or intubation * Chronic respiratory failure requiring oxygen therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients presenting clinically acceptable conditions for the diagnostic panendoscopy of the upper airwayDuring the diagnostic panendoscopy of the upper airwayThe assessment of the conditions for the diagnotic panendoscopy of the upper airway will be based on: (1) the conditions for the laryngoscopy (excellent=easy; good=fair; poor=difficult), (2) the position of the vocal cords (excellent=abducted; good=intermediate; poor=closed), (3) the movements of the vocal cords (excellent=none; good=moving; poor=closing), (4) the movement of the limbs (excellent=none; good=sight; poor=vigorous), (5) the cough (excellent=none; good=diaphragm; poor=sustained (\>10 s)). The conditions for the diagnostic panendoscopy will be considered as excellent when all variables will be excellent, as good when all variables will be either good or excellent and as poor when one or more variables will be graded as poor. Clinically acceptable conditions are defined as either good or excellent conditions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DeltaHRminDuring the diagnostic panendoscopyThe DeltaHRmin characterises the amplitude of the maximal decrease of the heart rate during the diagnostic panendoscopy of the upper airway. The DeltaHRmin is defined as following: deltaHRmin=((HRt0-HRmin)\*100)/HRt0). HRmin is the lowest value of the heart rate observed during the panendoscopy and HRt0 is the basal value of the heart rate.
DeltaMAPminDuring the diagnostic panendoscopyThe DeltaMAPmin characterises the amplitude of the maximal decrease of the heart rate during the diagnostic panendoscopy of the upper airway. The DeltaHRmin is defined as following: deltaHRmin=((HRt0-HRmin)\*100)/HRt0). HRmin is the lowest value of the heart rate observed during the panendoscopy and HRt0 is the basal value of the heart rate.
DeltaMAPmaxDuring the diagnostic pandoscopyThe DeltaMAPmax characterises the amplitude of the maximal increase of the mean arterial pressure (MAP) during the diagnostic panendoscopy of the upper airway. The DeltaMAPmax is defined as following: deltaMAPmax=((MAPmax-MAPt0)\*100)/MAPt0). MAPmax is the highest value of the mean arterial pressure (MAP) observed during the panendoscopy and MAPt0 is the basal value of the mean arterial pressure (MAP).
DeltaHRmaxDuring the diagnostic panendoscopyThe DeltaHRmax characterises the amplitude of the maximal increase of the heart rate during the diagnostic panendoscopy of the upper airway. The DeltaHRmax is defined as following: deltaHRmax=((HRmax-HRt0)\*100)/HRt0). HRmax is the highest value of the heart rate observed during the panendoscopy and HRt0 is the basal value of the heart rate.
Proportion of patients presenting at least one episode of severe hypoxemiaDuring the diagnostic panendoscopySevere hypoxemia is defined as a pulse oximetry value (SpO2) under 90% during the diagnostic panendoscopy of the upper airway.
Proportion of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilationDuring the diagnostic panendoscopyInvasive mechanical ventilation via an emergent surgical tracheotomy or an endotracheal intubation could be required in case of life-threatened hypoxemia during the diagnostic panendoscopy of the upper airway.
Proportion of patients presenting surgery complicationsDuring the panendoscopy of the upper airwaySurgical complications are defined as dental breakage, bleeding or mucosal injuries directly related to the diagnostic panendoscopy of the upper airway or to the biopsy.
Proportion of patients presenting at least one episode of moderate hypoxemiaDuring the diagnostic panendoscopyModerate hypoxemia is defined as a pulse oximetry value (SpO2) under 94% during the diagnostic panendoscopy of the upper airway.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026