Skip to content

High Versus Low Level of Lumbar Traction in Acute Lumbar Sciatica Due to Disc Herniation

High Versus Low Level of Lumbar Traction in Acute Lumbar Sciatica Due to Disc Herniation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02091791
Enrollment
17
Registered
2014-03-19
Start date
2002-08-31
Completion date
2006-09-30
Last updated
2025-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Lumbar Sciatica Secondary to Disc Herniation

Keywords

acute lumbar sciatica, lumbar traction, traction force, radicular pain, lumbar functional parameters, disc herniation

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare two levels (high and low forces) of short term lumbar traction on pain and functional tests of the lower limbs in a specific population of patients presenting with acute lumbar sciatica secondary to disc herniation. The investigators hypothesize that, in this particular medical condition, high level of lumbar traction might be more effective than low level lumbar traction in decreasing the pain associated with acute sciatica.

Interventions

PROCEDURETraction sessions

Sponsors

University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* less than 6-week lumbar sciatica secondary to disc herniation, confirmed by pain radiating down the leg along the distribution of the sciatic nerve together with positive straight leg raising test (SLRT)

Exclusion criteria

* symptoms persisting for more than 6 weeks * signs of clinical neurological deficit * lumbar sciatica not caused by disc herniation * presence of lumbar tomodensitometry abnormalities * Subjects younger than 18 * pregnant women * patients on medical leave for more than 3 weeks at inclusion * patients with history of lumbar surgery * patients who already had lumbar traction therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in radicular pain graduated from 0 to 100 mmMeasurement of radicular pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS) At baseline (day 0 - D0) as well as at day 14 (D14) (end of treatment) and day 28 (D28) (after 2 weeks follow-up).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Global mobility of the lumbar-pelvic spine evaluated using the finger to toe test (FTT, in cm)At baseline (day 0 - D0) as well as at day 14 (D14) (end of treatment) and day 28 (D28) (after 2 weeks follow-up).
Lumbar spine mobility (in mm) assessed with the Schöber-Macrae's testAt baseline (day 0 - D0) as well as at day 14 (D14) (end of treatment) and day 28 (D28) (after 2 weeks follow-up).
Signs of nerve root compression evaluation assessed by the SLRT and EIFEL scoreAt baseline (day 0 - D0) as well as at day 14 (D14) (end of treatment) and day 28 (D28) (after 2 weeks follow-up).

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026