Skip to content

Mobile Transmission of Prehospital Vital Signs to the Emergency Department

Telemedical Solutions in Medical Emergencies, Advantages and Disadvantages for Patients, Healthcare Professionals, and the Healthcare System: Study 1: Mobile Transmission of Prehospital Vital Signs to the Emergency Department - Effect on Patient Outcomes, Treatment and Diagnosis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02090452
Enrollment
250
Registered
2014-03-18
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2014-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emergency Medical Service, Telemedicine, Triage

Keywords

Telemedicine, Mobile, Vital signs, Prehospital care, Emergency medicine

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to examine if real time transmission of vital signs, ECG and chat communication between the prehospital ambulances and the emergency department has an effect on patient mortality, ICU admission, hospitalization time, time to doctor, time to treatment and time to diagnostics

Interventions

DEVICEReal time transmission of patient related data. Device used: MobiMed 3.1, manufactured by Ortivus AB Sweden

Sponsors

Aarhus University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Central Denmark Region
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients transported with ambulance to the emergency department

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to physicianTime from arrival to first patient-physician contact, assessed up to 36 monthsTime from the patient arrival registered in the patients' logistics system (Cetrea) to registered first patient/physician contact registered in the same patients logistics system.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All cause mortality30 days, assessed up to 36 months
Time to treatmentTime from arrival to administration of first iv. antibiotics, assessed up to 36 monthsTime from the patient arrival registered in the patients' logistics system (Cetrea) to first administered iv antibiotics registered in the patient's hospital record
Time to x-rayTime form arrival at the emergency department to completion of x-ray requisition form, assessed up to 36 monthsTime from the patient arrival registered in the patients' logistics system (Cetrea) to completion of x-ray requisition form registered in the radiologic logistics system (Kodak RIS, 2010 edition)
Time to ICUTime from arrival to admission to the ICU, assessed up to 36 monthsTime from the patient arrival registered in the patients' logistics system (Cetrea) to time of admission to the ICU registered in the patient's hospital record. .
Number of ICU admissionsDuring present hospitalization, assessed up to 36 months

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Emergency department staff evaluation of usability of equipmentAt the time of using the equipment, assessed up to 36 monthsThe staff at the emergency department fill out a survey after the use of the equipment which provides ecg, vital signs, chat.
Ambulance staff evaluation of usability of equipmentAt the time of using the equipment, assessed up to 36 monthsThe ambulance staff fill out a survey after the use of the equipment which provides ecg, vital signs, chat.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026