Skip to content

Subclavian Vein catheterization_Seldinger Vs Modified Seldinger

Comparison of Two Needle Insertion Techniques on Success Rate and Complications During Subclavian Venous Catheterization: Seldinger vs. Modified Seldinger Technique

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02090010
Acronym
MS
Enrollment
418
Registered
2014-03-18
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Neoplasm, Cerebrovascular Moyamoya Disease, Intracranial Aneurysm

Brief summary

Seldinger technique is a minimally invasive technique in which the practitioner accesses the target vessel with a small bore needle, then dilates to the size required for the catheter. Contrarily, modified Seldinger technique(guiding sheath-over-the-needle technique) use needle that is covered with guiding sheath. Both technique is widely used in central venous catheterization, however, few researches have been investigated to compare success rate or complications of both methods.

Detailed description

The major complications of central venous catheterization through subclavian vein, are unintended arterial puncture, pneumothorax, hemothorax, malposition of catheter etc,. We assume that using modified Seldinger technique (MST), guiding sheath is easily slid over the needle, providing stable route into the vessel lumen relatively. We aimed to compare the Seldinger technique and modified Seldinger technique(MST) on success rate and complications during subclavian central venous catheterization in this prospective, randomized , controlled trials.

Interventions

The aimed vessel(subclavian vein) is punctured with a sharp hollow needle, syringe is detached and guidewire is advanced through the lumen of the needle, and the needle is removed. After that catheter is passed over the guidewire into the vessel.

The aimed vessel is punctured with the needle that is covered with guiding sheath. After vessel is punctured, guiding sheath is instantly slid over the needle into the vessel. The needle is removed, guidewire is advanced through the sheath, central catheter is placed into the vessel.

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patient scheduled for surgery under genearl anesthesia and subclavian vein central catheterization

Exclusion criteria

* Patient who does not agree to the study * Inflammation or infection on catheterization site * Contralateral diaphragmatic dysfunction * Anatomic anomalies of subclavian artery or vein/clavicle * Previous lung surgical history * Patient who has ventriculoperitoneal shunt or chemoport on same side * Patient who has pneumo/hemothorax or lung parenchymal disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major complication rate of subclavian catheterizationintraoperativeCompare main complication rates of subclavian catheterization including pnumothorax, hemothorax, arterial puncture, malposition of cathter.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
primary success rate of subclavian catheterizationintraoperativeCheck the number of attempts of needling, guidewire advance, and catheterization in both groups.
Total insertion timeFrom skin puctuation until confim the successful catheterization anticipated within 3minCheck the total insertion time from skin puncture to confirm the successful catheterization via venous aspiration though catheter lumen.

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactHee Pyung Park, MD PhD
hppark@snu.ac.kr82-2-2072-2466
Backup ContactEugene Kim, MD
tomomie@hanmail.net82-2-2072-2469

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026