Skip to content

Controlled Randomized Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy Versus Resection (CoRaVNStiR)

Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy in the Patients With Medically Refractory Medial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy; Controlled Randomized Vagus Nerve Stimulation Versus Resection (CoRaVNStiR)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02089243
Acronym
CoRaVNStiR
Enrollment
40
Registered
2014-03-17
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2017-07-31
Last updated
2014-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epilepsy

Keywords

Epilepsy,Temporal Lobe, Brain Diseases

Brief summary

Background: There are a variety of treatment options for medically refractory medial temporal lobe epilepsy. Evidence from randomized trials indicates vagus nerve stimulation therapy can be used as a proven therapy for medically refractory medial temporal lobe epilepsy. Resective surgery is one of the most commonly used methods to treat medically refractory medial temporal lobe epilepsy. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of vagus nerve stimulation therapy and resective surgery in the treatment of the medically refractory medial temporal lobe epilepsy. Methods/Design: In this article, we report the design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial to treat medically refractory medial temporal lobe epilepsy with vagus nerve stimulation therapy or resective surgery. In total, 40 patients aged 12 to 60 years with medically refractory medial temporal lobe epilepsy will be assessed. There are two treatment groups. These patients are randomly assigned to be in one of the following two treatment groups, i.e. 1) undergo temporal lobe resection group, 2) receive vagus nerve stimulation therapy group. The primary outcome is to assess whether vagus nerve stimulation produces a reduction in mean monthly seizure frequency that is comparable to resection at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months of follow-up. The secondary outcomes include the neuropsychological, seizure severity, seizure type, quality of life, mood assessment, operative and postoperative complications and long-term side effects, compared to resection. Discussion: The result of this trial will assess the efficacy of using vagus nerve stimulation therapy or resective surgery to treat medically refractory medial temporal lobe epilepsy, and to determine a better therapy for treating medically refractory medial temporal lobe epilepsy.

Detailed description

Published data suggest that patients with temporal lobe epilepsy who continue to experience seizures after trials of two or three antiepileptic drugs are unlikely to become seizure-free with further attempts at resection. Such patients may experience poor quality of life and functional outcomes from continuing seizures and the adverse effects associated with further attempts at resection. Vagus nerve stimulation is a minimally invasive treatment for epilepsy with well-established effectiveness as an adjunctive treatment for partial seizures refractory to resection, but there are no vagus nerve stimulation is a minimally invasive treatment for epilepsy with well-established effectiveness as an adjunctive treatment for partial seizures refractory to resection, but there are no controlled randomized clinical trials comparing the effectiveness of Vagus Nerve Stimulation therapy with resection in such patients.

Interventions

The adjustments in device parameters were performed, individually, and solely at the discretion of the primary epileptologist with a formal protocol guiding changes.

The experienced neurosurgery are responsible for the selection of surgical techniques employed for medically refractory medial temporal lobe epilepsy that provide an effective treatment with significant preservation of neurological function and acceptable surgical risks.

Sponsors

Xijing Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presurgical candidates with pharmacoresistant partial seizures despite optimal medical treatment and history of medically refractory medial temporal lobe epilepsy * Age above 12 years, below 60 years * Average of 2 partial seizures per month during a baseline of 2 months * Recording of seizures must have been done in a prospective manner using standard seizure diaries * Video-EEG characteristics showing temporal lobe seizure onset (left-sided or right-sided seizure onset) in at least one recorded habitual seizure * Presence of a structural abnormality in the medial temporal lobe, suggestive of hippocampal sclerosis as evidenced by optimum MRI * Women of child-bearing age will be required to use a reliable method of contraception during the study duration, * Patient must be able to provide reliable seizure counts using seizure diaries and to complete the evaluations specified in the study procedures flow chart * Patient must provide written informed consent, or legal guardian must give written permission and the minor provide written assent.

Exclusion criteria

* Extratemporal epilepsy; multifocal epilepsy; evidence of bilateral medial medically refractory medial temporal lobe epilepsy * MRI evidence of potentially epileptogenic lesions outside the medial temporal lobe such as dysplasias, tumours or cavernomas * Prior resective intracranial surgery * Patients who are candidates for invasive video-EEG recording or have previously been investigated with invasive video-EEG recording * Patients who previously underwent any other type of neurostimulation for treating epilepsy * Patients who unable to fill in questionnaires and comply with protocol requirements * Progressive neurological or medical conditions * Medical or psychiatric conditions precluding surgery or compliance * Patients taking antidepressant medication * Pregnancy at study onset * Previous (within the last 3 months), ongoing or planned participation in other treatment study protocols for epilepsy * Contraindication for intracranial surgery * Contraindication for Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy * Patient has had a bilateral or left cervical vagotomy, currently uses, or is expected to use during the study, short-wave diathermy, microwave diathermy, or therapeutic ultrasound diathermy, * A VNS Therapy System implant would (in the investigator's judgment) pose an unacceptable surgical or medical risk for the patient * Patient is expected to require full body magnetic resonance imaging during the clinical study * Patient has had a previous VNS Therapy System implant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
seizure frequency3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
responder ratesduring 3 month intervals
mean seizure free intervalduring 3 month intervals
neuropsychological examination12 months
quality of life3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months
complicationsduring twelve months after inclusion.
seizure severityduring 3-month intervals

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactYanchun YC Deng, MD. PhD.
yanchund@fmmu.edu.cn+86 29 84773994

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026