Skip to content

Technology Intensified Diabetes Education Study in African Americans

Technology Intensified Diabetes Education Study in African Americans With Type 2 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02088658
Acronym
TIDES
Enrollment
200
Registered
2014-03-17
Start date
2013-05-01
Completion date
2026-01-01
Last updated
2026-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Adult-Onset, Diabetes Mellitus, Noninsulin Dependent, Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes Mellitus, Type II

Keywords

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes Mellitus, Adult-Onset, Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent, Diabetes Mellitus, Noninsulin Dependent, Diabetes Mellitus, Type II, African Americans, Blacks, non-Hispanic Blacks, Randomized Control Trial, Controlled Clinical Trial, Behavioral Research, Behavioral Medicine

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test the usefulness of an intervention that combines technology with diabetes education and skills training. This study has been designed specifically for African Americans with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

Detailed description

African Americans (AA) with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) have higher prevalence of diabetes, poorer metabolic control (i.e. poorer blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipid control), and greater risk for complications and death compared to White Americans. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is the primary marker for glycemic control and is a strong independent predictor of development of complications and increased mortality in T2DM. Key self-care behaviors that influence glycemic control (and HbA1c) include diet, physical activity, self-monitoring of blood glucose and medication adherence. Systematic review of multiple randomized clinical trials (RCTs) show that self-care interventions that include diabetes education and skills training are effective in improving metabolic control in diabetes. Recent findings indicate that patients with diabetes, especially ethnic minority patients, prefer telephone-delivered diabetes education to group visits or internet-based education. Multiple RCTs have documented the effectiveness of telephone-delivered self-care interventions in T2DM. Preliminary data from our group also suggest that a culturally-tailored telephone-delivered diabetes education and skills training intervention is an effective strategy to improve metabolic control in AA patients with T2DM. This study provides a unique opportunity to address gaps in the literature by testing the efficacy of a technology-intensified diabetes education/skills training (TIDES) intervention in AAs with poorly controlled T2DM. The long-term goal of the project is to identify effective strategies to improve metabolic control and hence reduce diabetes complications and mortality rates in AAs with T2DM.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTechnology Intensified

The intervention is based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB) model and provides information, motivation, and behavioral skills training (using motivational enhancement techniques). Patients will be assigned the FORA 2-in-1 Telehealth System and provided glucose test strips to allow testing at least once a day. They will be asked to perform glucose testing and blood pressure measurement using the FORA system once daily. They will be asked to upload the measurements daily as soon as possible after the test is performed. The nurse educators will have access to a secure server to which the uploaded measurements are stored in real time. The glucose and BP readings will be used to tailor and reinforce behavior change during weekly telephone-delivered diabetes education sessions.

Sponsors

State University of New York at Buffalo
Lead SponsorOTHER
Medical University of South Carolina
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥21 years * Clinical diagnosis of T2DM and HbA1c ≥8% at the screening visit * Self-identified as AA * Subject must be willing to use the FORA monitoring system for 12 months * Subjects must be able to communicate in English * Subjects must have access to a telephone (landline for data uploads) for the study period

Exclusion criteria

* Mental confusion on interview suggesting significant dementia * Participation in other diabetes clinical trials * Alcohol or drug abuse/dependency * Active psychosis or acute mental disorder * Life expectancy \<12 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hemoglobin A1c12 months post randomizationHemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): blood specimens collected at the 12-months follow-up visit

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLeonard E Egede, MD, MS

Medical College of Wisconsin

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
16 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
88 Participants
Age, Continuous56.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
Hemoglobin A1c10.3 mean percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic Black
200 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
95 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
73 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
35 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 950 / 105
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 950 / 105
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 950 / 105

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026