Skip to content

A Safety and Efficacy Study of Brimonidine Intravitreal Implant in Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration

Safety and Efficacy of Brimonidine Posterior Segment Drug Delivery System in Patients With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02087085
Acronym
BEACON
Enrollment
310
Registered
2014-03-14
Start date
2014-05-09
Completion date
2018-03-30
Last updated
2019-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Geographic Atrophy, Macular Degeneration

Brief summary

This study will assess the safety and efficacy of the brimonidine intravitreal implant in participants with geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration.

Interventions

DRUG400 µg Brimonidine Implant

400 µg brimonidine implant in the study eye using Brimo DDS® applicator on Day 1, and every 3 months through Month 21.

OTHERSham

Sham treatment with needleless applicator (no implant) to the study eye on Day 1, and every 3 months through Month 21.

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration in the study eye * Visual acuity better than or equal to 20/125 Snellen equivalent in the study eye and 20/200 Snellen equivalent in the fellow eye.

Exclusion criteria

* Cataract surgery or Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) in the study eye in the last 3 months * Infections in either eye in the last 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Geographic Atrophy (GA) Lesion Area of the Study Eye as Assessed by Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) at Month 24Baseline (Day 1) to Month 24GA lesion area was measured in mm\^2 by FAF in the study eye and was quantified by the central reading center. The study eye was defined as the eye that met inclusion/exclusion criteria with the worst standard Best Correct Visual Acuity (BCVA). If the BCVA in both eyes was similar the right eye was selected as the study eye. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of GA lesion area (worsening; disease progression). Mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used for analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Standard Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score as Assessed by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Chart at Month 24Baseline (Day 1) to Month 24BCVA was measured using an eye chart (ETDRS) and was reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). The study eye was defined as the eye that met inclusion/exclusion criteria with the worst standard BCVA. If the BCVA in both eyes was similar the right eye was selected as the study eye. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening. MMRM was used for analysis.
Change From Baseline in Low Luminance BCVA Score as Assessed by ETDRS Chart at Month 24Baseline (Day 1) to Month 24Low Luminance BCVA was measured by placing a 2.0 log unit neutral density filter over the best correction for that eye and having the participant read the normally illuminated ETDRS chart and was reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). The study eye was defined as the eye that met inclusion/exclusion criteria with the worst standard BCVA. If the BCVA in both eyes was similar the right eye was selected as the study eye. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening. MMRM was used for analysis.

Other

MeasureTime frame
Change From Baseline in Retinal Sensitivity in the Study EyeBaseline (Day 1) to Month 24

Countries

Australia, France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
400 µg Brimonidine Implant
400 µg brimonidine implant in the study eye, administered by intravitreal injections using the Brimonidine Drug Delivery System (Brimo DDS®) applicator every 3 months from Baseline (Day 1) through Month 21.
154
Sham
Sham treatment (control) in the study eye, administered by intravitreal injections using a needleless DDS applicator every 3 months from Baseline (Day 1) through Month 21.
156
Total310

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event1014
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy43
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up64
Overall StudyOther Miscellaneous Reasons34
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor8780
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject911

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic400 µg Brimonidine ImplantShamTotal
Age, Continuous76.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.89
77.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.24
76.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.56
Geographic Atrophy (GA) Lesion Area by Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF)5.1611 millimeters squared (mm^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7016
5.4761 millimeters squared (mm^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5961
5.3212 millimeters squared (mm^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6457
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
153 Participants156 Participants309 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
101 Participants91 Participants192 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
53 Participants65 Participants118 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 1546 / 156
other
Total, other adverse events
79 / 15461 / 156
serious
Total, serious adverse events
48 / 15437 / 156

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Geographic Atrophy (GA) Lesion Area of the Study Eye as Assessed by Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) at Month 24

GA lesion area was measured in mm\^2 by FAF in the study eye and was quantified by the central reading center. The study eye was defined as the eye that met inclusion/exclusion criteria with the worst standard Best Correct Visual Acuity (BCVA). If the BCVA in both eyes was similar the right eye was selected as the study eye. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of GA lesion area (worsening; disease progression). Mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used for analysis.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Month 24

Population: Participants from the mITT population, all randomized and treated participants with baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment for GA lesion area by FAF, with data available for analysis at Month 24.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
400 µg Brimonidine ImplantChange From Baseline in Geographic Atrophy (GA) Lesion Area of the Study Eye as Assessed by Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) at Month 243.1455 mm^2Standard Error 0.1377
ShamChange From Baseline in Geographic Atrophy (GA) Lesion Area of the Study Eye as Assessed by Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) at Month 243.5044 mm^2Standard Error 0.1359
p-value: 0.04795% CI: [-0.7132, -0.0047]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Low Luminance BCVA Score as Assessed by ETDRS Chart at Month 24

Low Luminance BCVA was measured by placing a 2.0 log unit neutral density filter over the best correction for that eye and having the participant read the normally illuminated ETDRS chart and was reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). The study eye was defined as the eye that met inclusion/exclusion criteria with the worst standard BCVA. If the BCVA in both eyes was similar the right eye was selected as the study eye. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening. MMRM was used for analysis.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Month 24

Population: Participants from the mITT population, all randomized and treated participants with baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment for GA lesion area by FAF, with data available for analysis for this outcome measure at Month 24.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
400 µg Brimonidine ImplantChange From Baseline in Low Luminance BCVA Score as Assessed by ETDRS Chart at Month 24-8.1 letters read correctlyStandard Error 1
ShamChange From Baseline in Low Luminance BCVA Score as Assessed by ETDRS Chart at Month 24-6.7 letters read correctlyStandard Error 1
p-value: 0.30195% CI: [-4.2, 1.3]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Standard Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score as Assessed by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Chart at Month 24

BCVA was measured using an eye chart (ETDRS) and was reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). The study eye was defined as the eye that met inclusion/exclusion criteria with the worst standard BCVA. If the BCVA in both eyes was similar the right eye was selected as the study eye. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening. MMRM was used for analysis.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Month 24

Population: Participants from the mITT population, all randomized and treated participants with baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment for GA lesion area by FAF, with data available for analysis for this outcome measure at Month 24.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
400 µg Brimonidine ImplantChange From Baseline in Standard Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score as Assessed by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Chart at Month 24-10.9 letters read correctlyStandard Error 1
ShamChange From Baseline in Standard Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score as Assessed by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Chart at Month 24-9.7 letters read correctlyStandard Error 1
p-value: 0.3995% CI: [-3.9, 1.5]MMRM
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Retinal Sensitivity in the Study Eye

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Month 24

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026