Skip to content

A Prospective Study of Airless Tubing in an Inpatient Acute Hemodialysis Unit in Hospitalized Patients

A Prospective Study of Airless Tubing in an Inpatient Acute Hemodialysis Unit in Hospitalized Patients in a Large Medical Center

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02086682
Enrollment
338
Registered
2014-03-13
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2019-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blood Coagulation Disorders, Complication of Dialysis, End Stage Renal Failure on Dialysis

Keywords

hemodialysis, dialysis, renal dialysis, clotting, coagulation, blood lines

Brief summary

The introduction of unfractionated heparin (UFH), which prevents clotting of the extracorporal circuit, was one of the key advances that led to the rapid development and expansion of hemodialysis services. However, anticoagulation during hemodialysis of the patient at high risk for bleeding remains a frequently encountered problem in both inpatient and outpatient dialysis practice. Streamline bloodlines are designed to eliminate blood-air contact. This is thought to help reduce heparin use and decrease clotting rates. The goal of this study was to prospectively examine impact of the Streamline airless blood tubing set, in an inpatient setting, on dialysis circuit clotting rates, anticoagulation use, and dialysis efficiency.

Detailed description

The introduction of unfractionated heparin (UFH), which prevents clotting of the extracorporeal circuit, was one of the key advances that led to the rapid development and expansion of hemodialysis use, and remains the mainstay in hemodialysis practice today. However, anticoagulation during hemodialysis of the patient at high risk for bleeding remains a frequently encountered problem in the nephrology practice. The need for anticoagulation to prevent clotting of the extracorporeal blood circuit and the need to prevent anticoagulation related bleeding complications in the patient has led to the development of numerous strategies; the safest from a bleeding standpoint being anticoagulant-free hemodialysis. Streamline® bloodlines (Medisystems® Corporation, Lawrence, MA) are designed to eliminate blood-air contact. A pressure pod measures arterial and venous pressures without any blood-air contact. The venous chamber is run without an air gap. It is also designed so that blood flows in a circular vortex manner. This airless system is thought to provide several benefits: improved dialysis efficiency and blood flow rates, reduced heparin use and clotting rates. The goal of this study was to prospectively examine the Streamline® airless tubing system in an inpatient setting and its association with clotting rates, and dialysis efficiency.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

NxStage Medical
CollaboratorOTHER
Marie Hogan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All adult non-pregnant patients requiring inpatient hemodialysis at our center during the recruitment period until the target sample of dialysis sessions (n=1200) was reached.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant females * Children

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clotting of Extracorporeal Dialysis CircuitDuring the dialysis session, approximately 211 minutesEach dialysis session was prospectively observed for Clotting of Extracorporeal Dialysis Circuit. Events were defined as interruption of hemodialysis session, loss of the hemodialysis circuit, or inability to return blood to the patient upon rinse back.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

338 patients were enrolled at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota from January 2014 to May 2015.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
General Care Cohort
The group included adult hospitalized patients requiring hemodialysis at the inpatient dialysis unit. This was an observational study, with no interventions.
156
Critical Care Cohort
The group included adult hospitalized patients requiring hemodialysis at the intensive care unit. This was an observational study, with no interventions.
182
Total338

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGeneral Care CohortTotalCritical Care Cohort
Age, Continuous63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.5
62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants7 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
9 Participants16 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants7 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
9 Participants12 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
133 Participants296 Participants163 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
156 participants338 participants182 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
60 Participants127 Participants67 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
96 Participants211 Participants115 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
31 / 15640 / 182
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1560 / 182
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1560 / 182

Outcome results

Primary

Clotting of Extracorporeal Dialysis Circuit

Each dialysis session was prospectively observed for Clotting of Extracorporeal Dialysis Circuit. Events were defined as interruption of hemodialysis session, loss of the hemodialysis circuit, or inability to return blood to the patient upon rinse back.

Time frame: During the dialysis session, approximately 211 minutes

Population: Units in the study referred to a dialysis session. A patient could have received dialysis more than once. Hence the number of patients (338) is less than the number of dialysis sessions (1200).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
General Care CohortClotting of Extracorporeal Dialysis Circuit30 Clotting events
Critical Care CohortClotting of Extracorporeal Dialysis Circuit33 Clotting events
p-value: 0.79t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026