Skip to content

Study Assessing the Potential for Reduced Rates of Implant Failure Using Multi-Beam Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Implant Reconstructions

Phase II Study Assessing the Potential for Reduced Rates of Implant Failure Using Multi-Beam Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Implant Reconstructions

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02086578
Enrollment
100
Registered
2014-03-13
Start date
2014-03-11
Completion date
2024-09-13
Last updated
2026-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

multi-beam Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), 14-028

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if a radiation treatment called "Multi-beam Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy"(IMRT) can reduce side effects related to your implant if they are a candidate for radiation therapy. Currently, the standard method of giving radiation is with "3D radiation", which only uses 2-5 beams of radiation. "Multi-beam" IMRT works by using 8-12 small radiation beams to give a more "tailored" or "customized" radiation dose to the implant, breast, chest wall and lymph nodes. At the same time, multi-beam IMRT may lower the radiation dose to the heart, lung and nearby tissues. The goal of the study is to reduce complications after irradiation to the implants. The study doctors have recently completed a trial using this technique and are now specifically looking at its impact on women with implant reconstructions who are undergoing post-mastectomy radiation therapy. By delivering a more "customized" dose of radiation to the implant, the intent is to reduce side effects of radiation on the implant.

Detailed description

Patients will undergo mastectomy and axillary dissection with immediate tissue expander placement. As is the current practice at MSKCC, patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy will undergo expansion during chemotherapy, with exchange for a permanent implant to be performed approximately one month after chemotherapy and radiation to begin approximately one month after exchange. Patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy will undergo "rapid expansion" of the expander and begin radiation at least 4 weeks following surgery, although it may be performed sooner if the patient has recovered from surgery and the treating physician deems it safe to proceed with treatment. In these patients, exchange for the permanent implant will occur at the discretion of the treating plastic surgeon (approximately 5-8 months after the end of radiation).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBreast-Q© questionnaire
RADIATIONMulti-Beam IMRT

The radiation dose (50-50.4 Gy/25-28 fractions in approximately 5-6 weeks), treatment-planning and delivery aspects are according to departmental guidelines for breast IMRT.

Sponsors

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Females who are age ≥ 18 years of age with a life expectancy estimated to be at least 2 years * Histologically-confirmed invasive breast cancer by MSKCC * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 * Status post mastectomy with surgical assessment of axillary nodes * Immediate reconstruction with tissue expander (Group 2) or permanent implant (Group 1) prior to RT performed at MSKCC * If PMRT is recommended, the treatment fields will include the axillary, supraclavicular, and internal mammary nodes.

Exclusion criteria

* Absence of a breast reconstruction prior to RT (placement of tissue expander is sufficient for group 2) * Pregnant or breastfeeding. * Psychiatric or addictive disorders that would preclude obtaining informed consent or filling out Breast-Q© questionnaires. * Prior radiation therapy to the ipsilateral breast/nodes or thorax. * The criterias outlined above apply to the patients enrolled to meet the primary objective of the study. Additional criteria for patients in the cardiac substudy portion of the protocol are outlined in the protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Implant Failure24 months post-IMRT for Group 1, and 30 months post-IMRT for Group 2The multi-beam IMRT would be considered efficacious if the incidence of implant failure is reduced by at least a relative 30% by the end of the study period (24 months post-IMRT for Group 1, and 30 months post-IMRT for Group 2).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Moderate to Severe Capsular Contracture24 months post-IMRT for Group 1, and 30 months post-IMRT for Group 2Will be examined using number of participants who developed Baker's grade \<2 and ≥2 capsular contracture, respectively, at 12 or 18 months and 24 or 30 months after IMRT was administered. Participants were assigned a Baker Classification score (a standardized 4-point scale, which integrates the texture and appearance of the breast) at baseline and each follow-up interval by the radiation oncologist or plastic surgeon (the higher of the 2 was used if the score was discordant). Significant capsular contracture is measured as Baker grade III or IV.
Rates of Minor Revisional Surgeries2 yearsIncidence of minor revisional surgeries by plastic surgeon will be evaluated by proportions too. Again, the rates (proportions) will be compared across the two groups.
Evaluate CosmesisBaseline, Follow-up 1 (Arm 1:12 months (± 2 mo); Arm 2:12-18 months (± 6 mo)), Follow-up 2 (Arm 1:12-18 months (± 6 mo); Arm 2:18 months (± 2 mo)), and Follow-up 3 (Arm 1:24 months (± 2 mo); Arm 2:30 months (± 2 mo))To evaluate cosmesis, the Breast-Q© will be utilized in these assessments and will be presented descriptively, giving summary statistics for changes in the Breast-Q© scores over time. With a focus on the post-operative period, the module will evaluate changes over time in four of the six subthemes identified by Breast-Q: (1) Psychosocial well-being; (2) Physical well-being; (3) Satisfaction with breasts; and (4) Satisfaction with outcome. Each subtheme will be evaluated using one or more scales. Each scale is independently scored into a value that ranges from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating greater satisfaction or better health-related quality of life.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDaphna Gelblum, MD

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous54 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
93 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
69 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
100 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
100 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 428 / 58
other
Total, other adverse events
32 / 4258 / 58
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 4215 / 58

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026