Skip to content

Needle-Free Injection of Lidocaine for Local Anesthesia Prior to Trigger Digit Injection

Needle-Free Injection of Lidocaine for Local Anesthesia Prior to Trigger Digit Injection

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02084706
Acronym
J-tip
Enrollment
60
Registered
2014-03-12
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2016-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Trigger Finger

Brief summary

Jet-injection (J-tip) is a rapid, minimally invasive delivery system that can be used for the subdermal injection of lidocaine solution for anesthetic purposes. The device has been found effective in pain reduction during IV catheterization in adults and children and lumbar puncture in children when compared to placebo saline-jet injection. \[1-4\]. We believe that administering local anesthetic via J-tip prior to triamcinolone(40 mg/ml) injection could mitigate pain that occurs during and immediately following injection while preserving the post-injection pain relief of anesthetic injection. Furthermore, pre-placement of the jet-injected local anesthetic may obviate the need for the inclusion of local anesthetic into the triamcinolone injection. This would decrease the amount of fluid injected, which could have positive pain modulation by decreased tissue disruption. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of needle free jet injection (J-tip) administration of 2% lidocaine in reduction of the pain experienced during trigger digit 40 mg/ml triamcinolone injection. Hypothesis: Needle free jet injection (J-tip) administration of 2% lidocaine will prove an equal or superior means of pain reduction when compared to 2% lidocaine injection in the setting of trigger digit triamcinolone injections.

Interventions

PROCEDURETriamcinolone (20 g) and 2% Lidocaine injection over the A1 pulley
PROCEDUREJ-tip lidocaine administration
PROCEDURETriamcinolone (20 g) Injection over the A1 pulley.

Sponsors

Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who present to the Hand Clinic at Brigham and Women's Hospital or Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, are 18 years of age or older and are indicated for a trigger digit steroid injection will be eligible for participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Visual-analog Score (VAS) for Anticipated Pain Prior to Injection and Actual Pain After InjectionOur outcome measure was collected within the 60 seconds before and following the steroid injection.Members of both study groups completed the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain assessment both prior for anticipated pain and after injection for actual pain; these recorded scores were the primary study endpoint and were later compared to determine the difference in anticipated pain versus actual pain experienced. The VAS ranges from 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst possible pain. The outcome measure is the mean anticipated pain minus the actual pain experienced.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Triamcinolone (20 g) and 2% Lidocaine Injection Over A1 Pulley
Group one subjects will receive an injection of 0.5mL (20 g) of Triamcinolone and 0.5 mL of 2% Lidocaine over the A1 pulley. Triamcinolone (20 g) and 2% Lidocaine injection over the A1 pulley 2% Lidocaine Triamcinolone (20 g)
29
J-tip Lidocaine Administration, Then Steroid Injection
Group two subjects will receive a needle free J-tip administration of 0.5mL of 2% lidocaine prior (2-10 minutes) to needle injection of 0.5mL of Triamcinolone (20 g) over the A1 pulley. 2% Lidocaine Triamcinolone (20 g) J-tip lidocaine administration Triamcinolone (20 g) Injection over the A1 pulley.
31
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicJ-tip Lidocaine Administration, Then Steroid InjectionTriamcinolone (20 g) and 2% Lidocaine Injection Over A1 PulleyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
16 Participants17 Participants33 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants12 Participants27 Participants
Age, Continuous65.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
Gender
Female
17 Participants17 Participants34 Participants
Gender
Male
14 Participants12 Participants26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
31 Participants29 Participants60 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 290 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Difference in Visual-analog Score (VAS) for Anticipated Pain Prior to Injection and Actual Pain After Injection

Members of both study groups completed the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain assessment both prior for anticipated pain and after injection for actual pain; these recorded scores were the primary study endpoint and were later compared to determine the difference in anticipated pain versus actual pain experienced. The VAS ranges from 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst possible pain. The outcome measure is the mean anticipated pain minus the actual pain experienced.

Time frame: Our outcome measure was collected within the 60 seconds before and following the steroid injection.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Triamcinolone (20 g) and 2% Lidocaine Injection Over A1 PulleyDifference in Visual-analog Score (VAS) for Anticipated Pain Prior to Injection and Actual Pain After Injection1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
J-tip Lidocaine Administration, Then Steroid InjectionDifference in Visual-analog Score (VAS) for Anticipated Pain Prior to Injection and Actual Pain After Injection2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026