Skip to content

Evaluating a Shared Decision Making Program for Crohn's Disease

Evaluating a Prediction Tool and Decision Aid for Patients With Crohn's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02084290
Enrollment
204
Registered
2014-03-11
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2019-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn's Disease

Keywords

Crohn's disease, Shared Decision Making, Decision Aid

Brief summary

Specific Aim: Study the impact of the Crohn's Disease Shared Decision Making Program on patients' treatment choice, persistence with chosen therapy, decision quality, cost of care, and outcomes Hypothesis: The Crohn's Disease Shared Decision Making Program will help patients understand which treatments are right for them and will lead to a higher acceptance of appropriate therapy, improved persistence with chosen therapy, lower costs and improved clinical outcomes. To accomplish this aim, Investigators will perform a randomized controlled trial to: 1. Determine how the shared decision making program influences patients' choice of therapy 2. Evaluate how the shared decision making program affects persistence with chosen therapy 3. Determine how the shared decision making program affects decision quality 4. Determine how the shared decision making program influences cost of care and clinical outcomes Expected Outcome and Impact: Investigators expect that this program will influence patients' choice of therapy, persistence with their preferred therapy, and lead to improved clinical outcomes. Investigators believe that this product can be successfully operationalized in the clinic to establish a new paradigm of how providers can communicate personalized treatment options to patients across a broad range of diseases.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALShared Decision Making Program

This study is cluster randomized by study-site, Subjects enrolled at intervention sites will access an educational program and risk prediction tool. Their decisions about treatments will be compared to subjects that did not view the educational program or risk prediction tool.

Sponsors

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
CollaboratorFED
University of Pittsburgh
CollaboratorOTHER
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
CollaboratorOTHER
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Maryland
CollaboratorOTHER
Brigham and Women's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Thomas Jefferson University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Chicago
CollaboratorOTHER
Atlanta Gastroenterology Associates
CollaboratorOTHER
Long Island Clinical Research Associates
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Center for Digestive and Liver Diseases
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Charlotte Gastroenterology and Hepatology
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Minnesota Gastroenterology
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ohio Gi and Liver Institute
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Winthrop University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of Crohn's Disease based on standard clinical, radiographic, endoscopic, and histologic criteria * Age 18 or older * Fluent, English Speaking * A candidate to receive immunomodulators or anti-TNF therapy based on their providers recommendation * not currently taking immunomodulators (6-mercapropurine, azathioprine, methotrexate) or anti-TNF agents (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol)

Exclusion criteria

* Participant in a pilot study/focus group for development of Crohn's Shared Decision Making Program * Currently taking any medication that is contraindicated to take together with an immunomodulator or anti-TNF agent * Known intolerance to either immunomodulators or anti-TNF agents * Lack of accessibility to e-mail for follow-up surveys

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of patients choosing Combination therapyWeek 1

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Choice of therapyWeek 1, Week 2, week 26, week 52, week 78, week 110no therapy, immunomodulator monotherapy, anti-TNF monotherapy, Combination therapy
Persistence (adherence) with chosen therapyWeek 1, Week 2, week 26, week 52, week 78, week 110
Quality of DecisionWeek 1, Week 2, week 26, week 52, week 78, week 110i. Decisional conflict (validated scale) ii. Decision consistent with patient values (i.e., patient receiving the treatment that they want) iii. Trust in physician
Cost of Careweek 110Crohn's disease related costs at 2 years
Time to initiation of therapyWeek 1, Week 2, week 26, week 52, week 78, week 110
Patients on Steroids6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsProportion of patients taking steroids
Surgeries6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsProportion of patients requiring Crohn's disease related surgery
Crohn's disease related hospitalizations6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsNumber of hospitalizations
Remission6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsProportion of patients in clinical remission

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026